- 35,255
- 26,908
- Joined
- Jul 13, 2005
I like Jennings off the bench. He can have that Isaiah Thomas role.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Crazy how much money Cliff lost, feel bad for him.
I'll be devastated. Unless the Sixers draft someone this year or next year who is a superstar, we are screwed. This "plan" was built around Embiid.if Embiid totally busts, I am gonna be so sad
I thought this awhile ago, but didn't want to sound dumb so I didn't ask
Can someone explain to me why Stanley Johnson is ranked lower than Justise Winslow? I don't understand it at all. I feel like Stanley has the higher upside and is a monster physically.
Latest DX Mock Draft: http://www.draftexpress.com/nba-mock-draft/2015/list/
I like Jennings off the bench. He can have that Isaiah Thomas role.
I'm okay with the Lakers grabbing porzingis , if you're gonna gamble he's got the toolset worth the risk
If they feel he can be better than Randle then you take him ...gotta pick for talent over needs/fit in the top 5-7I'm okay with the Lakers grabbing porzingis , if you're gonna gamble he's got the toolset worth the risk
Problem is you have to trade Randle then.
Would be an irresponsible use of assets.
If they feel he can be better than Randle then you take him ...gotta pick for talent over needs/fit in the top 5-7I'm okay with the Lakers grabbing porzingis , if you're gonna gamble he's got the toolset worth the risk
Problem is you have to trade Randle then.
Would be an irresponsible use of assets.
apparently low post offense is a thing of the 90s so who needs it right?You can't ask Zinger to bang down low at 220 though.
Like I was saying if you think he's the best player on the board and better than what you have then you take him...top 5 it's in your best interest to grab the BPA ....Randle hasn't played a whole game yet and is coming off a serious injury, he's not some untouchable player that should have his spot solidified yetIf they feel he can be better than Randle then you take him ...gotta pick for talent over needs/fit in the top 5-7I'm okay with the Lakers grabbing porzingis , if you're gonna gamble he's got the toolset worth the risk
Problem is you have to trade Randle then.
Would be an irresponsible use of assets.
You do that if the guy is absolutely better and in no possible way can that guy be a bust. Has to have 0 bust potential, and be far greater than the guy you just drafted.
And nobody can say that's the case. Definitively.
If you had Shaq, or Tim Duncan, or LeBron, or Anthony Davis.
A clear once in a generation player, then you take that guy because talent > needs there.
But when there are guys who on the board who AT THE VERY LEAST, and I'm being generous are as good as Porzingis, then you take need + talent.
It's an irresponsible use of assets.
And I've been seeing that alotta other magic fans want Winslow at #5 ...Ima need that NOT to happen
Yea kristaps is a cool pick with me or I guess BPA again ( which wouldn't be Winslow) since we have no lottery luck lately ...WCS would be so good for the squad on defense but then we would be playing 3 or 4 vs 5 on the other end with him and PeytonAnd I've been seeing that alotta other magic fans want Winslow at #5 ...Ima need that NOT to happen
This is where I think Porzingis should end up.
Need shooters, need somebody to spread the floor.
Not sure how much I like the defensive fit, if a team goes big, they will demolish the Magic. But if they play a traditional stretch 4 team where the other guy can shoot, but isn't too athletic, Porzingis should be fine.
Winslow brings so little offensively in the first couple of years that he'd just make the Magic worse, even for what he adds defensively on the perimeter.
WCS is the type of defensive player that the Magic need next to Vuc. But not sure if you can get away with Vuc at the 4, numbers from what I remember are not good when he is.