- Mar 17, 2014
- 12,961
- 10,430
Yes. Yes it is :/That Knicks roster is terrible though
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes. Yes it is :/That Knicks roster is terrible though
#SEERED
I got respect for that Cavs team, I hate them, but not as much as I hated Miami. Having said that, even some fellow Bulls "fans" are crowning Cleveland already. My team can win it all. Not guaranteeing anything, but I aint scared of the Cavaliers. Formidable opponent, but very beatable.
I got respect for that Cavs team, I hate them, but not as much as I hated Miami. Having said that, even some fellow Bulls "fans" are crowning Cleveland already. My team can win it all. Not guaranteeing anything, but I aint scared of the Cavaliers. Formidable opponent, but very beatable.
My dude!!
you already know. Aint no one conceding the East to the Cavs.
Lets see if they really about that hard work, grit, and grind.....they have to come thru MIAMI!!
son. that new lebron james nike commercial gave me chills, b. CHILLS.
Isn't Gatorade the official sponsor of the NBA? They can't serve nothing but Gatorade on the bench I'd presume.
So we're still back to a 40 million dollar difference. Dudes saying they would turn that money down and Carmelo will regret this. Like come on son. It's a five year deal and Phil has told him it's gonna take a couple years. Coaching staff has already said this new system will take 2-3 months to pickup.
This segment with Kevin Hart was painful
View media item 301543I don't know, the Lakers being irrelevant was a pretty good one.
At the end of the day...the Bulls wanted to have their cake and eat it too. They had more than one offer for him yet really tried to sell him on taking $64-70M over four years. They also offered the LeBron deal (two years w/ a "promise" of the max in 2016), but Melo had no interest in going through it again and taking that risk.The most they could offer was 4 years and ~ 80 million after trading Taj and filler to free up cap space for a max contract, which they were willing to do and apparently had trades lined up to do so. NY could give him the extra year because they owned his bird rights which is where the 20 million figure came in. It wasn't a matter of the Bulls FO being cheap, it was the fact that NY would be able to offer him more money regardless of what the Bulls did.No it wasn't.
Bulls weren't offering no damn $100M.
Anyone who says they would turn down the difference in money between Bulls/Knicks is a ******* liar. Blame Chicago for not making the gap close enough.
I guess next year is soon then.Knicks aint getting a star anytime soon especially a good one