Stephen A. Smith Wylin

This guy must be getting the funding that Trump cut from Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro.
Yeah, his turn was pretty quick. All of a sudden he’s throwing out ideas on topics he’s never had before. That foreign funding must have hit the account
 
I come in peace but don't MOST people not care about the Epstein list?

Hell, even in the thread on here some folks were saying only those that care about conspiracy theories give a damn about this.


How is Epstein list getting grouped in with conspiracy theories?

I’d get conspiracies becoming a thing off of it, cause that’s what some people always do

But the shh happened, 2 people went to jail and 1 died.. there are very public pics and vids and victims who have spoken out and died

Like with the sexual abuse of young boys by the those in the Catholic Church.. unfortunately it happened, but I’d expect there to be conspiracy theories that came from that but the thing itself is not a conspiracy theory.. that unfortunately happened
 
How is Epstein list getting grouped in with conspiracy theories?

I’d get conspiracies becoming a thing off of it, cause that’s what some people always do

But the shh happened, 2 people went to jail and 1 died.. there are very public pics and vids and victims who have spoken out and died

Like with the sexual abuse of young boys by the those in the Catholic Church.. unfortunately it happened, but I’d expect there to be conspiracy theories that came from that but the thing itself is not a conspiracy theory.. that unfortunately happened
The LIST meaning who is/isn't on the list is the conspiracy.

NOT that it did/didn't happen.

The convo was about the LIST dropping.

It's literally in the clip posted.

SAS said he didn't care about the LIST.
 
The LIST meaning who is/isn't on the list is the conspiracy.

NOT that it did/didn't happen.

The convo was about the LIST dropping.

It's literally in the clip posted.

SAS said he didn't care about the LIST.

I get there will be speculation about the people who attended/participated.. and conspiracies about the cover up, especially when the current president of America and a prince of England were as close as they were with the man

But I don’t understand being dismissive of it or attempting to belittle what took place in any manner, people have died.. people were abused

What does it benefit Stephen a smith to encourage for anything but the truth
 
Last edited:
But I don’t understand being dismissive of it or attempting to belittle what took place in an manner, people have died.. people were abused

What does it benefit Stephen a smith to encourage for anything but the truth

I'm sure he has orders to follow if he wants to be allowed into that space. It's that simple.

Just like he has speaking points he takes from ESPN, of COURSE he will have a script he must follow on a much bigger stage.
 
I'm sure he has orders to follow if he wants to be allowed into that space. It's that simple.

Just like he has speaking points he takes from ESPN, of COURSE he will have a script he much follow on a much bigger stage.

Who’s giving him orders?

And allowed in what “space”?


Those things aren’t very simple when talking about the abuse of children by powerful people
 
SAS is being "allowed" to even be entertained as a potential political personality. (Maybe even a career, who knows if it gets that far). This isn't just him on his little radio show where he can say any/everything he pleases.

It's clear the LIST won't be revealed so I would assume the speaking point is to convince people it's not that serious (It being the LIST; not the TOPIC) and people should move on with worrying about it. (It being the LIST; not the TOPIC)

As I mentioned in the Epstein thread, it's probably folks involved in this situation on ALL sides of the "battle" so maybe there was a collective agreement that the list will be placed under wraps.
 
which part is the conspiracy exactly?

As with the Catholic Church, anyone involved deserves to burn.. and that includes Stephen a smith if he feels the need to sell some story for whatever personal gain

Children were abused.. and it’s the people facing the consequences of their actions that’s in question.. even if it’s just public scorn and ostracization
 
which part is the conspiracy exactly?

As with the Catholic Church, anyone involved deserves to burn.. and that includes Stephen a smith if he feels the need to sell some story for whatever personal gain

Children were abused.. and it’s the people facing the consequences of their actions that’s in question.. even if it’s just public scorn and ostracization

1. Unless there is an official list that has been publicly released, the (speculation of) NAMES on the list that were involved in ANY of this operation would be the conspiracy.

2. Again, who (of the people that KNOW who is on the list) is going to go against marching orders and speak publicly against those people/agencies? Who is going to publicly scorn them? People fear for their lives/careers too much to hop out there like that.
 
If wherever you’re trying to go in life calls on you to assist to whatever degree in covering for child abuse or making it go away, seems pretty simple you need to reevaluate your life choices and whoever you’re getting orders from
 
Back
Top Bottom