- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,886
- 62,813
Last edited:
SPUMC Thread - RIP STAN LEE - ACROSS THE SPIDERVERSE out now
- Aug 6, 2012
- 58,009
- 61,941
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
"Marvel's" answer to Gotham City Sirens 
- Sep 1, 2008
- 15,242
- 4,618
Don't connect Marvels good name to that trash.
This is a Sony unit.
This is a Sony unit.
Last edited:
MarvelSux
formerly brucewayne
- Jul 19, 2012
- 2,237
- 1,304
Sony 
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,880
- 50,394
See, I thought they were making 2 separate films. One solo Black Cat movie and then one Silver Sable movie.
Combining them together I'm not sure about.
BC is a thief, sometimes villain, sometimes hero, a bit of an anti-hero in the cartoon. SS is a mercenary and freedom fighter for her country.
So unless Cat is about to rob SS's country and some other villain gets in the mix I don't see it.
Krqven and Spider-Woman being in it just makes me scratch my head
At least it seems like Sony does own some if not all of the Spider-Woman rights.
I even thought of an idea to get around Spidey's absence in these movies.
Combining them together I'm not sure about.
BC is a thief, sometimes villain, sometimes hero, a bit of an anti-hero in the cartoon. SS is a mercenary and freedom fighter for her country.
So unless Cat is about to rob SS's country and some other villain gets in the mix I don't see it.
Krqven and Spider-Woman being in it just makes me scratch my head
At least it seems like Sony does own some if not all of the Spider-Woman rights.
I even thought of an idea to get around Spidey's absence in these movies.
Sony's SCU > DCEUSony
Last edited:
- Mar 12, 2011
- 7,833
- 8,466
Kraven in this movie before a Spider-Man film [emoji]128532[/emoji]
Don't do this Sony
Don't do this Sony
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
I have full faith that Marvel will have their hands on the Sony villain films. If nothing else they HAVE to be involved in the designs of the costumes
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
sony just has to duplicate Fox's blueprint & they'll be good.
they should be in a better position cuz Spider is MCU.
they should be in a better position cuz Spider is MCU.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,357
- 202,849
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,880
- 50,394
This is leaning on fanfic. Just crammed with Spidey Easter eggs from allies to villains. It reminds me of the rumored idea for the Batman movie that was just filled with Batman villains and Deathstroke
Gotta see this to believe it.
- Aug 6, 2012
- 58,009
- 61,941
Gon be Sony's version of Suicide Squad
Last edited:
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
fox cuz Sony doesnt have da cadre of characters da MCU has.
they gotta work with whatever is directly connected to Spider-Man.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,880
- 50,394
@ Fox blueprintSony gonna need better than that. Underachieving like Fox is what originally made them make the deal with Marvel in the first place.
I figure if they actually intend to initially not include Spider in these spinoffs itsncuz they want to build up to his debutbafter the contract rubs out with those 3 MCU Spidey movies. So Venom is off doing his thing, Black Cat and Sable have their own adventures, S6 is building up, etc.
Plus that gives time for Peter to age and be a bit older when he does show up instead if these ppl interacting with a young teen. He can at least be in his early 20s.
- Apr 27, 2014
- 10,935
- 9,262
No faith in this verse
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
fox is making bread underachieving, Sony can't even be competent on that level.
X-men have LOADS of mutants to work with, Sony only has a SMALL pool of characters, like i said, their best bet is to wink wink nod to Spidey being in da movies as da bridge to things that happen in da MCU.
X-men have LOADS of mutants to work with, Sony only has a SMALL pool of characters, like i said, their best bet is to wink wink nod to Spidey being in da movies as da bridge to things that happen in da MCU.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,880
- 50,394
What are you talking about?
Sony was easily making bank with their underachieving Spider-Man movies.
When I say Fox is underachieving I'm talking about how much they are making compared to how much they should be making and they have all the mutants at their disposal. They don't have one movie that's even touched a billion or got close.
That **** is pathetic. We're talking about the X-Men. They got one great Wolverine movie and at best one good X-Men movie.
They just may have permanently hobbled their chances of ever seeing success the way the MCU have.
Sony still has a chance to do their thing in that regard. So no, they shouldn't be following any Fox blueprint if the end goal is to rake in billions. Why you think they did the deal with Marvel in the first place? They looking to get some of that MCU success to rub off on them.
Sony was easily making bank with their underachieving Spider-Man movies.
When I say Fox is underachieving I'm talking about how much they are making compared to how much they should be making and they have all the mutants at their disposal. They don't have one movie that's even touched a billion or got close.
That **** is pathetic. We're talking about the X-Men. They got one great Wolverine movie and at best one good X-Men movie.
They just may have permanently hobbled their chances of ever seeing success the way the MCU have.
Sony still has a chance to do their thing in that regard. So no, they shouldn't be following any Fox blueprint if the end goal is to rake in billions. Why you think they did the deal with Marvel in the first place? They looking to get some of that MCU success to rub off on them.
Last edited:
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
I wanna see Spider-man with the symbiote THE RIGHT WAY more than I want to see it on Eddie Brock again
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
because they're in da worst position outta all of da studios, Sony has mediocre movies AND a shallow character roster.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
they could mess around and have da timeline set waaaay after da events of da MCU and have a more grown Spider-Man introduce venom in their movies.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,880
- 50,394
Just cuz we getting a Venom movie first doesn't mean we won't see black suit Spider-Man at some point.
Some of yall are too hung up on the sequence events when we know the movies always tend to do things differently.
Some of yall are too hung up on the sequence events when we know the movies always tend to do things differently.
Last edited:
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
problem is venom's origins are inextricably linked to spiderman, da set up has to be perfect or else its gonna fail.
- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,755
- 106,472
What if the symbiote suit is in Homecoming after Tony takes the high tech suit away but they've been guarding that carefully?
Last edited:
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,880
- 50,394
Yeah, you talking out your ***.FoX-Men make the same mediocre movies and squander their character roster.
Sony currently is in a better position than Fox and DC just cuz they did the deal with the MCU.
The small roster is irrelevant when they have Spider-Man. Spider-Man movies make more than X-Men movies on average.
That's really only if you're still hung up on the comic origins.
Last edited:
- Sep 23, 2012
- 32,830
- 24,897
I'd rather them give it to us in infinity war. Go to space and get it. Have the collector have it in a case or have the Guardians bring it to earth after they discover the planet like the Bendis comics. The story is right in front of them. They'd literally have to go out their way to give the symbiote a different origin
Last edited:
