- 4,404
- 11
Uh-huh...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by Nako XL
i know i promised i'd ignore dude but this is getting absurd. son won't take my advice and just call it a night. he's already hit his post limit on one username but insists on spewing nonsense on the next one.
i don't even know anything about people jerking off babies but please tell me what that has to do with the op. YOU helped take this there, yet when sn00pee asks you a simple question, "do YOU consider an 18yo and a 16yo having sex, to be pedophilia" (and i'm going to add "as deviant as an 21 yo having sex with someone who's 11" a more obvious example of pedophilia) you sidestep the question and call it "stupid and irrelevant, hum hum hum." but then why did YOU harp on it so much arguing language and technicalities?
and i've told you, you're a smart guy. quit with the wikipedia and yahoo searches. i'm not the one with %!@$ blowing up in my face.
Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Dudes are resorting to personal attacks and rhetoric after failing to prove a point.
I tried to keep it civil and educated in here and have a real discussion, eventhough I know that doesn't usually work on NT.
Now Anton is coming in here to defend his friends parting shot with with Marvel vs Streetfighter videos....That would be cool if Nako actually made a point or refuted mine, which he clearly didn't.
He criticizes me for over-extending the conversation...then calls for me to dive further into unrelated conversations.
My posts speak for themselves and those with an an inclination for study and elightenment can can draw their own conclusions through research.
No need in arguing with every wave of NT posters that replies to this thread. I'm starting to repeat myself now.
*good looking out sn00pe
Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Dudes are resorting to personal attacks and rhetoric after failing to prove a point.
I tried to keep it civil and educated in here and have a real discussion, eventhough I know that doesn't usually work on NT.
Now Anton is coming in here to defend his friends parting shot with with Marvel vs Streetfighter videos....That would be cool if Nako actually made a point or refuted mine, which he clearly didn't.
He criticizes me for over-extending the conversation...then calls for me to dive further into unrelated conversations.
My posts speak for themselves and those with an an inclination for study and elightenment can can draw their own conclusions through research.
No need in arguing with every wave of NT posters that replies to this thread. I'm starting to repeat myself now.
*good looking out sn00pe
in other words, I make $%%+ up, but you can go look into it yourself and i mightttt be right.Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Dudes are resorting to personal attacks and rhetoric after failing to prove a point.
I tried to keep it civil and educated in here and have a real discussion, eventhough I know that doesn't usually work on NT.
Now Anton is coming in here to defend his friends parting shot with with Marvel vs Streetfighter videos....That would be cool if Nako actually made a point or refuted mine, which he clearly didn't.
He criticizes me for over-extending the conversation...then calls for me to dive further into unrelated conversations.
My posts speak for themselves and those with an an inclination for study and elightenment can can draw their own conclusions through research.
No need in arguing with every wave of NT posters that replies to this thread. I'm starting to repeat myself now.
*good looking out sn00pe
Originally Posted by GTEK
The appeal to rididcule is a very popular tactic on NT.
Thats why I just state my opinion and keep it moving.
Nako XL wrote:
Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Dudes are resorting to personal attacks and rhetoric after failing to prove a point.
I tried to keep it civil and educated in here and have a real discussion, eventhough I know that doesn't usually work on NT.
Now Anton is coming in here to defend his friends parting shot with with Marvel vs Streetfighter videos....That would be cool if Nako actually made a point or refuted mine, which he clearly didn't.
He criticizes me for over-extending the conversation...then calls for me to dive further into unrelated conversations.
My posts speak for themselves and those with an an inclination for study and elightenment can can draw their own conclusions through research.
No need in arguing with every wave of NT posters that replies to this thread. I'm starting to repeat myself now.
*good looking out sn00pe
you didn't say anything! anything at all!
36hypno and ninjahood said homosexuality was the same as incest, bestiality, and pedophilia. i told them they were stupid and gave them reasons why.
THEY seem to have understood.
then you came in here, itchin for an argument. i engaged you. you rambled, i explained why it was wrong. sn00pee asked you if even YOU truly believe the $%!$##** you're spouting. all of a sudden you're duck dodgers.
but you're right. you made a great point. you're realllly smart. i've said absolutely nothing in this thread... yet YOU still haven't answered sn00pee's question. if GTEK hadn't come to rub some salve in your wounds you wouldn't have even spoken another word in here.
hey Huey...
http://i41.tinypic.com/256z90k.png src="http://i41.tinypic.com/256z90k.png">
Perfect Example.
Guy has posted about 40+'s and's Since he been in here.
Originally Posted by Nako XL
answer what question? the incest angle is pure stupidity, and i've already said i thought so. twice.Originally Posted by ninjahood
aka answer da question.Originally Posted by Nako XL
Originally Posted by 36hypno
Originally Posted by Nako XL
Originally Posted by 36hypno
Originally Posted by GTEK
Originally Posted by ninjahood
da incest angle is a good one...you really can't accept homosexuality without kinda green lighting incest too.
Word. Might as well throw in beastiality while we at it.
Exactly. So where does it all end?
dude thinks he's an academic because he got cosigned.
Son all you have brought to the table is a "" and an attempt at a funny remark. You are an apologist who has no argument but "you are an idiot" and "wow this guy." Think for yourself
an apologist? yikes.
you're comparing homosexuality to forced sex and a sexual relationship that is illegal worldwide because it ALWAYS ultimately leads to genetic deformity.
I'm still waiting for this to be answered. I like how on the page this was posted, dude answered every reply to him but dodged this one.Didn't even come to me to bring this up earlier since it's wild gross.Originally Posted by ShoxBb433
How can you disqualify the incest arguement by saying it produces genetic deformities in children but the act of homosexual sex is not even a natural method for child reproduction? And while we are at it, that would mean that you condone homosexual incest because there are no risks for genetic deformity.Originally Posted by Nako XL
answer what question? the incest angle is pure stupidity, and i've already said i thought so. twice.Originally Posted by ninjahood
aka answer da question.Originally Posted by Nako XL
an apologist? yikes.Originally Posted by 36hypno
Son all you have brought to the table is a "Originally Posted by Nako XL
Originally Posted by 36hypno
Exactly. So where does it all endOriginally Posted by GTEK
Word. Might as well throw in beastiality while we at it.Originally Posted by ninjahood
da incest angle is a good one...you really can't accept homosexuality without kinda green lighting incest too.dude thinks he's an academic because he got cosigned." and an attempt at a funny remark. You are an apologist who has no argument but "you are an idiot" and "wow this guy." Think for yourself
you're comparing homosexuality to forced sex and a sexual relationship that is illegal worldwide because it ALWAYS ultimately leads to genetic deformity.
that is why the incest angle is not "a good one."
if you want to compare homosexuality to a deviant sexual act then compare it to oral sex (another word for sodomy), and any sexual position that isn't man on top missionary.
don't just come in here spouting off nonsense, listing a number of activities you think are weird and, in your own small mind, on par with gay sex.
My opinion is that homosexuality should not be forced onto young people in the media, especially at a teen choice award show. I also think that people are not born homosexual, but there is no way to prove this one way or the other.
Originally Posted by Master Zik
I don't know who lives in NYC and who doesn't but if you're 18 and sexing somebody that's 16 trust that it IS a crime and YOU WILL BE prosecuted.
I don't know where yall coming with it probably won't be prosecuted don't know shhh about anything. You know how many 18 year old dudes catching cases cuz the parents of a 16 year old chick wanted to press charges? The FACT that it IS a CRIME already ends the argument.
Not only is that a serious topic regarding law reform in NYC it's debated at length from colleges to universities when it comes to a sociology, psychology, and criminology class. I've talked to a grip of professors, cops, and ADAs and the best they can come up with is wait a year before you smash.
Wasn't there some college football player who smashed some 16y year old chick in the south and ended up losing his scholarship and had to register as a sex offender?
Originally Posted by HueyP in LouieV
Uh-huh...
I think we can all agree with that.Originally Posted by sn00pee
I know we're spinning way off topic with this discussion on incest/pedophilia.
But seriously, 18 vs 16, is 2 years there isnt a big difference, if any between the two ages.
Just because something is on the books as being illegal doesnt make it right.
I'm no advocate for Pedophilia, but an 18yo sleeping with an 16yo does not warrant the stigma of pedophilia.
Originally Posted by GTEK
shots fired at me, the innocent bystander.
I thought dude was supposed to leave 2 posts ago.
You know a argument has been put to waste after the guy leaves with an insult.
Why are y'all even arguing this ?Originally Posted by sn00pee
I know we're spinning way off topic with this discussion on incest/pedophilia.
But seriously, 18 vs 16, is 2 years there isnt a big difference, if any between the two ages.
Just because something is on the books as being illegal doesnt make it right.
I'm no advocate for Pedophilia, but an 18yo sleeping with an 16yo does not warrant the stigma of pedophilia.