- 274
- 10
You guys makin wan't to try some vomeros, but all I've ran in are some structure triax am93's and a90's. I don't recommend the 90's
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Originally Posted by andfattoo
Do both have more impact protection than Zoom RS's??Originally Posted by jeffgdula
Not sayin' they are "better," just better for running. They were made for runners. They are more flexible, responsive and cushioned. They fit better on your foot too.Originally Posted by andfattoo
I really gotta try those Vomero's... Jeff why are they better than AM 2009s again?
I've never even tried the RSs on but I can't imagine either has less.
I hated running in Moto 5s. Vomero 4s are better than 3s. You should check them out.Originally Posted by Dynamic X
I still don't understand why the heck you guys are obsessed with a $160 shoe. When you're running, you shouldn't be looking at your feet anyway, so the looks shouldn't matter to you. If you want to look good for other people, then I guess you could run on a treadmill, but people rarely care about you at the gym so, I don't understand.
Anyway, my favorites are:
-Air Zoom Vomero 3
-Air Zoom Spiridon 2003
-Air Max Moto 5
Well said. That's what I had picked in my previous post. I have a fairly flat foot and my left overpronates more than the right. I'dsacrifice cushion for protection.Originally Posted by Traveler9
Many people wearing the Vomero shouldn't even be wearing it for long runs. Statistics show more than 2/3 of all people overpronate to some degree. The Vomero looks great, but it's for a neutral foot. The Structure Triax is the Nike's stability option (counters overpronation) in that price range, and is, IMO, the best option for medium-weight, high-mileage runner, as long as the fit is right, last-wise. I've also run in the Air Equalon, which is the highest priced offering the in the stabilty category. I find the Equalon to be way too soft, almost mushy, while the Structure Triax is firmer and more responsive, yet still very well cushioned.
I have the asian foot, and I'm still confused as to what my foot enjoys the most. What I mean by "asian" foot is that I have anextremely high arch, yet a small but wide foot (Size 8 but 4E width). I apparently overpronate, as the insides of my Nimbuses have worn down extremely as wellas my Motos, yet I seem to like neutral or supinator shoes the best.Originally Posted by T21D
Well said. That's what I had picked in my previous post. I have a fairly flat foot and my left overpronates more than the right. I'd sacrifice cushion for protection.Originally Posted by Traveler9
Many people wearing the Vomero shouldn't even be wearing it for long runs. Statistics show more than 2/3 of all people overpronate to some degree. The Vomero looks great, but it's for a neutral foot. The Structure Triax is the Nike's stability option (counters overpronation) in that price range, and is, IMO, the best option for medium-weight, high-mileage runner, as long as the fit is right, last-wise. I've also run in the Air Equalon, which is the highest priced offering the in the stabilty category. I find the Equalon to be way too soft, almost mushy, while the Structure Triax is firmer and more responsive, yet still very well cushioned.
Originally Posted by Dynamic X
I have the asian foot, and I'm still confused as to what my foot enjoys the most. What I mean by "asian" foot is that I have an extremely high arch, yet a small but wide foot (Size 8 but 4E width). I apparently overpronate, as the insides of my Nimbuses have worn down extremely as well as my Motos, yet I seem to like neutral or supinator shoes the best.Originally Posted by T21D
Well said. That's what I had picked in my previous post. I have a fairly flat foot and my left overpronates more than the right. I'd sacrifice cushion for protection.Originally Posted by Traveler9
Many people wearing the Vomero shouldn't even be wearing it for long runs. Statistics show more than 2/3 of all people overpronate to some degree. The Vomero looks great, but it's for a neutral foot. The Structure Triax is the Nike's stability option (counters overpronation) in that price range, and is, IMO, the best option for medium-weight, high-mileage runner, as long as the fit is right, last-wise. I've also run in the Air Equalon, which is the highest priced offering the in the stabilty category. I find the Equalon to be way too soft, almost mushy, while the Structure Triax is firmer and more responsive, yet still very well cushioned.
I have ran in Asics 1120s, which were good, but then I switched to the Nike Air Triax 11s, and those hurt my feet after awhile, so I switched to Air Max Moto 5's, and those were alright. I may take pictures of how worn down the Nimbus insides are because I think it shows I'm an overpronator, but they don't pain my feet compared to the Triax 11, which felt like rocks to me. But I may have to run in them outside to give them a fair view as I ran in them on a treadmill.
SINcereOne03, I'm just curious if you know what causes a foot to need a neutral vs. a stability shoe. You're comparing neutral shoes(the Nikes) to a stability shoe (the Asics Kayano). And since the Kayano is your preference of the 3, then you should try Nikes from the stability category...Zoom Equalon, Zoom Structure Triax, Zoom Elite, Air Span, etc.Originally Posted by SINcereOne03
Vomero's and Spiradons are tied for me, but Asics Keyanos over both of them. Hate to say it, but Keyanos are the most consistent series out of all of them. There's a reason why Keyano's are up to XV's, they're like Jordans of running
7/1 is the release day for the white/beets and both showed up on ndc today, so that is my guess.Originally Posted by cbfpunch
does anyone know when those black vomero 4s will release?
Vomero's and Spiradons are tied for me, but Asics Keyanos over both of them. Hate to say it, but Keyanos are the most consistent series out of all of them. There's a reason why Keyano's are up to XV's, they're like Jordans of running
by this logic, i guess the pegasus takes the cake! isn't that shoe up to like number 25 or something?
Originally Posted by Jonas Dees
I'm a big fan of Vomeros but I haven't checked out the 4's yet.
One thing I do wish Nike would do with the Vomeros is make a Storm or GTX version during the colder months. The Structure Triaxs are too rigid for my liking and the Pegasus doesn't have enough cushioning.
I mean is it so much to ask for an all-weather version of your top of the line runner?
peace
Jonas
I hated running in Moto 5s. Vomero 4s are better than 3s. You should check them out.
I have the 3s which I love and have a couple questions for the 4 owners. What has improved on the 4's? Fit? I don't see any difference at all inpics. Also, after wearing 8.5 in the 1's, I need a size 8 for the 3's. Are the 4's sized the same as the 3's? Thanks
Originally Posted by rayban776
I hated running in Moto 5s. Vomero 4s are better than 3s. You should check them out.