Retro 11 "Bred" LC

[khalifa kush]

Took these over to footlocker they said they were legit, what do you think??? Let me know!View media item 848640View media item 848642View media item 848644View media item 848646View media item 848648View media item 848650View media item 848652View media item 848654

 

[timmybrixxx]

The guys that work at a random FTL are not credible IMHO. I think you have a GM pair here but would ask for more UNFILTERED pix to make an accurate determination..

23s look off.. laces look thin, choppy toe caps, paper in box LOOKS too dark but could just be the image if it's been filtered. Snap a few more pix outside for us.

 

[kbeats12]

I don't think these are legit. Check the right shoe. See how the points on the midsole and the outsole aren't lined up?

  Dead giveaway.

 

[joseph8764]

there is no way these are authentic. the 23 is way off and the cut around the PL looks off.

 

[Rumble Gang]

Idk I'm leaning legit. 23s are the only thing that look off to me. Can't tell if its factory flaw or not. This is rough. Everything else down to the box paper looks fine to me. Midsole and outsole not lining up fine is not a credible way to determine real vs fake. Plenty of legit pairs made with them being off

 

[from88til]

Definitely need a better shot of the 23's. Straight shot of the back to clear up any confusion.

 

[khalifa kush]

Sorry haven't been home was out of town right quick for spring break. From what I've been reading about the Breds the fake ones have the 23 all stretched, these don't and the ball lines up right. Here's the pic let me know the final verdict guys.View media item 852705

 

[from88til]

Leaning towards fake on these. The heel tab material looks too thin and the 23 looks like the one the GM bred 11's I had before. That paper is also dark..

 

[khalifa kush]

Papers not dark?

View media item 852748

 

[from88til]

Is that a different pair you originally posted?

 

[khalifa kush]

No it's just unfiltered, I didn't add no effects

 

[dino23]

These look legit to me.

 

[from88til]

Get a straight shot of the back of both shoes without flash.

 

[khalifa kush]

View media item 852924
Left

 

[khalifa kush]

View media item 852934
Right

 

[beh235]

They could be legit. The fact that the "points" on the heel in the midsole and outsole don't exactly match up doesn't mean anything, it's even slightly off on 2000 versions of XI's I have. Every other flaw being pointed out with the shoe could just be a casualty of decreasing quality in jordans overall.

 

[khalifa kush]

Damn you Jordan brand !!! Step your quality up !!!

 

[from88til]

Honestly not liking the look of these.. They look a lot like the GM bred 11's I had..

 

[jantos91]

hmmmm im uneasy about these breds. the 23s look stretched. can u try and get a photo of the heal cushions from an aerial view (looking down at the actual shoe?) if there is a lot of cushion you can almost bet these are GM. as of right now i would pass on these 

 

[khalifa kush]

View media item 854316

 

[from88til]

The only thing bothering me is the heel tab. The material should be thicker and come out more. These look flat like my late GM's.

 

[khalifa kush]

With flash.View media item 854365

 

[khalifa kush]

View media item 854369

 

[jantos91]

This is a tough one. the heal tabs are bothering me as well. hmm ive seen XIs that are authentic with similar issues on the heal tabs..if the price is right i say get em. bu if theyre outrageous then pass

 

[timmybrixxx]

23s are just wrong IMHO... I'm thinking someone swapped box's to help sell them.. the kicks look ok but theres only 1 reason that 23 would be that way..If they were GM.