Originally Posted by
epox12
Originally Posted by
23ska909red02
epox12:
To all the Lakers fans saying the refs gave the Heat that championship why aren't you saying the same thing about the 2002 Lakers?
#1. Because the Western Conference Finals is not the same as the Finals, where the championship is won. Being gifted in the WCF gets you... a trip to the Finals. Being gifted in the Finals gets you... the championship.
#2. Don't let a few biased observers sway your opinion. Things weren't nearly as lopsided as the hype machine since then has made things out to be. Bibby, Vlade, Webber, and Christie were KNOWN floppers that year, and they started off the series flopping like no one's business. It's hard for me to re-watch the very beginning minutes of that series, Game 1- first quarter, because the intentions of the Kings were so evident from the jump: flop early, flop late, get a few buckets in between. And their whining to the refs when their flopping didn't work has to be looked at as at least a little bit contributory to their series loss. When you flop and don't get the call and the Lakers are running the other way with the ball and 2 of your best players (Christie and Webber, for example) are jawwing at the refs, that's the Lakers fault?
That's the refs fixing the game? Really? Them standing there arguing instead of playing the damn game is a fix?
It's nothing like the 2006 robbery that was the NBA Finals.
#1 A Robbery is a robbery. Normally I would agree with your logic about the Finals but in this case I disagree because WCF was the Finals at that time because the eastern conference teams were so inferior. There was no way New Jersey was winning a game against either one of those teams.
#2 Getting 29 foul calls in the 4th qt. of game six is not arguing about nothing, I think they might have had a legit gripe. If its not the Lakers fault the Kings weren't getting calls why is it the Heat's fault the Mavs weren't getting calls?
Let's take a look at this "ROBBERY."
-Game 1: Lakers shot 16/22 FTs.Kings shot 16/17 FTs. Kings -5 in FT attempts
Foul differential? Lakers 20 Fouls, Kings 25. Kings -5 Foul
-Game 2: Lakers shot 15/25 FTs.Kings shot 23/38 FTs. Kings +13 in FT attempts
Foul differential? Lakers 31 Fouls, Kings 25. Kings +6 Foul
-Game 3: Lakers shot 8/15 FTs. Kings shot 21/35 FTs. Kings +20 in FT attempts
Foul differential? Lakers 19 Fouls, Kings 28. Kings +9 Foul
-Game 4: Lakers shot 18/27 FTs. Kings shot 18/26 FTs. Kings -1 in FT attempts
Foul differential? Lakers 23 Fouls, Kings 23. Kings +1 Foul
-Game 5: Lakers shot 17/23 FTs. Kings shot 22/33 FTs. Kings +10 in FT attempts
Foul differential? Lakers 27 Fouls, Kings 20. Kings -7 Foul
-Game 6: Lakers shot 18/25 FTs. Kings shot 34/40 FTs. Kings -15 in FT attempts
Foul differential? Lakers 31 Fouls, Kings 24. Kings -7 Foul
-Game 7: Lakers shot 27/33 FTs. Kings shot 16/30 FTs. Kings -3 in FT attempts.
Foul differential? Lakers 25 Fouls, Kings 30. Kings -5 Foul
For the series. Kings +19 FTs.
For the series. Kings -8 Fouls.
There were plenty of missed calls all around.
Kobe's elbow to Christie's face.
The non-call on Jackson's jersey pull on Kobe's game winning shot attempt in game 5.
Vlade's grab of and hold of Shaq that resulted in numerous Shaq fouls.
Game 4 total collapse by the Kings.
Kings missed 14 FTs in game 7 that was decided by 6 points in OT. Not to menton Peja went 0-6 from the arc including a few airballs down the stretch.
Robber? King's not getting their calls? Hardly.