whose job is it to collect evidence again?
what evidence were there to collect to prove that he had malicious intent from the beginning? That he didn't act in self defense ...
By no means am I saying that TM was a thug or the aggressor. He was a young boy that happen to fall to a tragic event that probably could of have been avoided.
but how many times have you heard this?
He was a model citizen!
He was an Angel!
He never hurt no one!
He was defending himself!
And time and time again these people being talked about were.
Serial Killers or Molesters
Drug dealer - mugger - murder
He was doing the attacking - initiated the conflict
and the evidence has proved it (cameras, records, forensics, arrest records, victimized kids, etc)?
Just saying we only have one story and whether we like it or not, that's all we can ever go by unfortunately!
