- Jul 6, 2008
- 12,422
- 2,916
if mistrial, zimmerman would still go free
rather a mistrial than the term he was found not guilty
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
if mistrial, zimmerman would still go free
Im still free! The ex *** tried her hardest, but the judge saw through it! Big Mike, reppin the Dverse security makin me look a million bucks, broke her down! Thanks to everyone for checkin up on me! Stay tuned for the A.T.F. charges......
2 felonies dropped to 1 misdemeanor!!!!!!!!!!! The man knows he was wrong but still got this hump, Thanks to everyone friends and fam, G baby you know your my rock!
I dont miss driving around scared to hit mexicans walkin on the side of the street, soft *** wanna be thugs messin with peoples cars when they aint around (what are you provin, that you can dent a car when no ones watchin) dont make you a man in my book. Workin 96 hours to get a decent pay check, gettin knifes pulled on you by every mexican you run into!”
ur a lil late bruh bruhhttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/05/02/zimmerman-myspace-page_n_1471818.html
From Zimmerman's myspace....
Im still free! The ex *** tried her hardest, but the judge saw through it! Big Mike, reppin the Dverse security makin me look a million bucks, broke her down! Thanks to everyone for checkin up on me! Stay tuned for the A.T.F. charges......
2 felonies dropped to 1 misdemeanor!!!!!!!!!!! The man knows he was wrong but still got this hump, Thanks to everyone friends and fam, G baby you know your my rock!
I dont miss driving around scared to hit mexicans walkin on the side of the street, soft *** wanna be thugs messin with peoples cars when they aint around (what are you provin, that you can dent a car when no ones watchin) dont make you a man in my book. Workin 96 hours to get a decent pay check, gettin knifes pulled on you by every mexican you run into!”
that's my point, b.
laws in fla and other states like it basically make it possible for this kind of thing to happen
terrible ruling, terrible justice system, terrible people who are gloating like this is some kind of moral victory for their side.
we all know who's being championed here and celebrating as if this is some free white hood giveaway (as a whole) and it's not george zimmerman. this idiot is just a pawn in their game. really hope he ain't thinking he got the backing of racist america because when **** hits the fan he too will be quickly placed on the opposing side
and the people on the jury are in no way my peers so let's stop referring to a selected jury as peers - they don't see things the way i do, they don't have the same friends as i do and they certainly don't represent me or people like me in any way, shape of form
hope this coward zimmerman eventually gets what's coming to him
I'm with you on the first 2 sentences- especially the messed up justice system and the fools gloating about it like it was a win, or the idiots "trayvoning". As for everything below that, how could you possibly know enough to make that call? You clearly picked your side, built up your own case with selected facts, and now you post this "jury of peers" like its a jury of your own damn friends there to decide your fate. Peers as in fellow Americans. There was nothing racial/racist/prejudice about the trial, or the jurors- the only potential racial aspect was the profiling (which, say what you will about that). You would've been in here gloating like it was a victory for you as well if he was found guilty (based on the way you're taking this), just like these dumb*** white fools going around doing the same right now. Everybody involved lost, including Zimmerman - so why play in to this side vs. side crap anyways.
"they don't see things the way I do" isn't a justification for a jury's decision. That's how a child would handle it. C'mon NT- we're better than this
How can YOU possibly know that?I'm with you on the first 2 sentences- especially the messed up justice system and the fools gloating about it like it was a win, or the idiots "trayvoning". As for everything below that, how could you possibly know enough to make that call? You clearly picked your side, built up your own case with selected facts, and now you post this "jury of peers" like its a jury of your own damn friends there to decide your fate. Peers as in fellow Americans. There was nothing racial/racist/prejudice about the trial, or the jurors- the only potential racial aspect was the profiling (which, say what you will about that). You would've been in here gloating like it was a victory for you as well if he was found guilty (based on the way you're taking this), just like these dumb*** white fools going around doing the same right now. Everybody involved lost, including Zimmerman - so why play in to this side vs. side crap anyways.
"they don't see things the way I do" isn't a justification for a jury's decision. That's how a child would handle it. C'mon NT- we're better than this
laws in fla and other states like it basically make it possible for this kind of thing to happen
terrible ruling, terrible justice system, terrible people who are gloating like this is some kind of moral victory for their side.
we all know who's being championed here and celebrating as if this is some free white hood giveaway (as a whole) and it's not george zimmerman. this idiot is just a pawn in their game. really hope he ain't thinking he got the backing of racist america because when **** hits the fan he too will be quickly placed on the opposing side
and the people on the jury are in no way my peers so let's stop referring to a selected jury as peers - they don't see things the way i do, they don't have the same friends as i do and they certainly don't represent me or people like me in any way, shape of form
hope this coward zimmerman eventually gets what's coming to him
I'm with you on the first 2 sentences- especially the messed up justice system and the fools gloating about it like it was a win, or the idiots "trayvoning". As for everything below that, how could you possibly know enough to make that call? You clearly picked your side, built up your own case with selected facts, and now you post this "jury of peers" like its a jury of your own damn friends there to decide your fate. Peers as in fellow Americans. There was nothing racial/racist/prejudice about the trial, or the jurors- the only potential racial aspect was the profiling (which, say what you will about that). You would've been in here gloating like it was a victory for you as well if he was found guilty (based on the way you're taking this), just like these dumb*** white fools going around doing the same right now. Everybody involved lost, including Zimmerman - so why play in to this side vs. side crap anyways.
"they don't see things the way I do" isn't a justification for a jury's decision. That's how a child would handle it. C'mon NT- we're better than this
B37's jury selection interview was utterly absurd...
anyone ever seen "Runaway Jury"?
she hates the media and only cares about her ******g birds yet had a book deal ready to go two days later? oh ok....
and you didn't know anything about the case but said, "I think they (protestors PRIOR to the case) were over the top...." and it was an "unfortunate incident"
this ***** was so full of ****.
Makes NO sense, does it? This was NOT a SYG case, as Zimmerman waived that "right" last year, I believe. They waived it because given the scenario, there's no way he would've won because he followed the kid. You can't stand your ground after you initiate a situation where someone dies. Crazy to think that this was the thought process of a juror, and possibly several."Verdict hinged on “Stand Your Ground” law, even though Zimmerman did not use it in his defense?
ANDERSON COOPER: Because of the two options you had, second degree murder or manslaughter, you felt neither applied?
B-37 JUROR: Right. Because of the heat of the moment and the Stand Your Ground. He had a right to defend himself. If he felt threatened that his life was going to be taken away from him or he was going to have bodily harm, he had a right."
so homegirl used a law in her decision that wasn't brought up by the defense nor mentioned in the jury instruction just her own interpretation, amazing.
A white man's.New Talking Point: Trayvon Was the Bigot, As He Thought Zimmerman Was Gay
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/poli...t-because-he-thought-zimmerman-was-gay/67235/
Jesus christ what world am I living in?
2 days after the verdict, how is Zimmerman still alive?
Surely someone in the entire state of Florida is about that life, go handle that dude ASAP.
Whoooooo"Verdict hinged on “Stand Your Ground” law, even though Zimmerman did not use it in his defense?
ANDERSON COOPER: Because of the two options you had, second degree murder or manslaughter, you felt neither applied?
B-37 JUROR: Right. Because of the heat of the moment and the Stand Your Ground. He had a right to defend himself. If he felt threatened that his life was going to be taken away from him or he was going to have bodily harm, he had a right."
so homegirl used a law in her decision that wasn't brought up by the defense nor mentioned in the jury instruction just her own interpretation, amazing.
Makes NO sense, does it? This was NOT a SYG case, as Zimmerman waived that "right" last year, I believe. They waived it because given the scenario, there's no way he would've won because he followed the kid. You can't stand your ground after you initiate a situation where someone dies. Crazy to think that this was the thought process of a juror, and possibly several.
'Murica.
New Talking Point: Trayvon Was the Bigot, As He Thought Zimmerman Was Gay
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/poli...t-because-he-thought-zimmerman-was-gay/67235/
Jesus christ what world am I living in?
white manz world.
New Talking Point: Trayvon Was the Bigot, As He Thought Zimmerman Was Gay
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/poli...t-because-he-thought-zimmerman-was-gay/67235/
Jesus christ what world am I living in?
What ya'll think about working towards changing the law so that a random adult cannot just follow a minor?
What ya'll think about working towards changing the law so that a random adult cannot just follow a minor?
can't make a law out of that. simply following someone should or could never be against the law. stalking, hunting - that sorta thing obviously, but following? nah
plus it's florida we're talking about - a state notorious for its backwardness and corruption, so getting a law changed that doesn't fulfill some other completely different agenda is nearly impossible
Yeah like all minors are angels ...What ya'll think about working towards changing the law so that a random adult cannot just follow a minor?