- Jun 16, 2008
- 15,990
- 5,971
Lets recap.
Ravens had better:
-Defense as a whole (by a lot)
-Running game (by a good amount too)
-Coaching (by a good amount)
Cowboys had better:
-Wide Receivers (by a good amount)
Cowboys and Ravens were similar in:
-Offensive line
But somehow, this doesn't mean that the Ravens have always had vastly superior teams. Comical.
Did I say that the Ravens haven't been the better team?
Please point out where.
This discussion is about QBs, which one we prefer.
It's devolved into a discussion about stats.
So since stats are SO heavily weighed in this discussion, QB aerial weaponry HAS to have greater weight than defense, coaching, running game, etc...