- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,804
- 30,199
I dont know if he counts, but Rich Gannon was a journeyman with mediocre production until the Raiders when he went off for a good stretch of seasons in his mid-30s.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Def. counts. Don’t see too many guys that late in their careers have a good stretch like thatI dont know if he counts, but Rich Gannon was a journeyman with mediocre production until the Raiders when he went off for a good stretch of seasons in his mid-30s.
Saints were better without Brees LAST YEAR, only reason Vikings won in the playoffs is because Brees was back there. I get why they stick with him, but just happy it aint my squad.My day yesterday......
I watched Sam Darnold and Ryan Fitzpatrick.
Then Taysom Hill and Denver "QB"
Then Brady-Mahomes
Finished with Trubisky and Rodgers.
Darnold, Fitz, Taysom, Denver, Trubisky.
Mahomes, Brady, Rodgers.
What a day.
Saints 7-0 without Brees, which.......I don't grasp.
Wentz doesn't get me @'d anymore, ever.
I have a Raider friend that nags me about Carr daily.......he musta been out yesterday.
Mahomes and that O is absurd. 24 was SICK all day long. Dude prolly never gonna play KC again.
Let's say, things continue.......Mahomes, HUGE year. MVP. Unanimous. (Or close to)
Ben goes 16-0, same conference, and wouldn't win MVP? Is that even possible?
Def. counts. Don’t see too many guys that late in their careers have a good stretch like that
Wanted to look up Pennington but he had more Fitzpatrick like jumps through the years
Tannehill in Tennessee is somethin like 17-8 with 53 TD's and 12 Int's, 111 QB rating and 7 rushing TD's. (Including playoffs)
I mean....... *shrugs*
I like what Josh Allen is doin in Buffalo. I didn't expect to, he still worries me, but I like watchin him.
felt like Payton was scared to lean on Taysom packages a little more when they were workingSaints were better without Brees LAST YEAR, only reason Vikings won in the playoffs is because Brees was back there. I get why they stick with him, but just happy it aint my squad.
I’m not saying Taysom should take over at all just saying specifically for how the Saints are built Sean shouldn’t be scared to use him more in balance with an old Brees. I’m talking about trying to win a playoff game and not who’s taking over the throne for the next decadeTaysom won't work vs real defenses. Atlanta twice is not a thing.
How he looked vs Denver is more realistic.
Saints can't use him, but I'm sure Sean will try. But, he's the new Great White Hype, so
Maybe 10-15 passes mixed in with some more option schemes (when needed) and if the defense isn't ready, Lean more on it. Just use "the toy" a little moreI completely rock with him "as a toy".
Couple runs.
Wildcat play or two.
Catch a pass or two.
Punt gunner + Punt Fake threat.
Backup kick returner.
All that.
QB, vs a playoff defense, reading a defense and making 20+ throws, no.
He is the media's wet dream and it is disgusting.
I listened to someone on radio, didn't catch who, he claimed FULLY, Taysom will be up there with Mahomes, Watson, Rodgers, Ben etc. He tripled up on it.
After 2 starts, and zero TD passes.
I hate all of it. It's ludicrous.
They won't win a playoff game this year either unless they do......just my 2 centsfelt like Payton was scared to lean on Taysom packages a little more when they were working
Maybe he will this time around
Carr is once again 7-6, if Vegas fails again, do they pull his plug too?
I wanna see Stafford in Denver under a Joe Brady or someone.