QB THREAD - 2x quarterbacky award winner: Lamar Jackson

it's not hurt over that sentence. it's comedy over the fact that one person bolded that sentence in an aim to prove some point about luck :lol

But all the comments are aggressive defensiveness over that one sentence...
 
Aggressive defensiveness?
laugh.gif
roll.gif
 
I like that. I kinda hope the Steelers D uses that phrase for this year.
 
Aggressive defensiveness, hurt......you're kind of a girl, aren't you 10027? Always crying, telling others they're emotional, stuff like that. Tryin to read or interpret feelings thru a keyboard. All feminine traits.
Cuz we don't praise your QB enough. :(
 
Aggressive defensiveness, hurt......you're kind of a girl, aren't you 10027? Always crying, telling others they're emotional, stuff like that. Tryin to read or interpret feelings thru a keyboard. All feminine traits.
Cuz we don't praise your QB enough. :(

Just commenting. You tend to catch feelings very easily. I think it's apparent.

I figure the number of ":lol" emoticons is usually the sign of how many tears you've cried over a particular issue.


edit: I thought SneakerPro's point with the bolding was that certain commentators in this forum wouldn't be able to handle one negative sentence about Luck even in a very positive paragraph that had him ranked as the #4 QB in the NFL... And he was proven right, obviously.

But maybe I missed it.
 
Last edited:
Aggressive defensiveness, hurt......you're kind of a girl, aren't you 10027? Always crying, telling others they're emotional, stuff like that. Tryin to read or interpret feelings thru a keyboard. All feminine traits.
Cuz we don't praise your QB enough. :(

Just commenting. You tend to catch feelings very easily. I think it's apparent.

I figure the number of ":lol" emoticons is usually the sign of how many tears you've cried over a particular issue.


edit: I thought SneakerPro's point with the bolding was that certain commentators in this forum wouldn't be able to handle one negative sentence about Luck even in a very positive paragraph that had him ranked as the #4 QB in the NFL... And he was proven right, obviously.

But maybe I missed it.

[COLOR=#red]Took one post though... :lol[/COLOR]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So much hurt over one sentence.... It's not even that negative.

it's not hurt over that sentence. it's comedy over the fact that one person bolded that sentence in an aim to prove some point about luck :lol

In this very thread I've said Andrew Luck is great but throws too many interceptions.

The Andrew Luck is infallible brigade came out the woodwork saying he doesn't.

An objective writer says he does and these same ****boys are now saying "why are you only highlighting one sentence"

Because a writer that thinks Andrew Luck is really good says he throws too many interceptions.
 
never really hear people say he doesnt throw a lot  interceptions. they just give what seem like valid reasons as to why he throws em. like no running game, no line, being forced to try to make plays etc etc. 
 
Last edited:
never really hear people say he doesnt throw a lot  interceptions. they just give what seem like valid reasons as to why he throws em. like no running game, no line, being forced to try to make plays etc etc. 

Then do that with every quarterback. And not just the ones people favor.
 
Back
Top Bottom