- Jul 30, 2011
- 25,831
- 15,061
Do you think Academy voters had problems with "the facts" Capt Phil was based on?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The pilot didn't actually do much for me, but I enjoyed the acting. So I gave the second episode a shot and it definitely picks up a little better from there.Currently on season 2.
yall ever catch The Killing on AMC?
IMO, this season has better twists and turns than season 1. Although season 1 develops the story and background to it all so I didn't expect crazy twists.
I really like this show. I'm glad Netflix picked up the final season to end the series.
Eh the stuff he was in this year just wasn't THAT good imo. While his strongest was Captain Philips I'm not surprised. The movie gets a nom though.at the Tom Hanks snub today. So much for his comeback year... going from potential double nominee to nothing at all. I was not expecting this ether because Hanks is pretty beloved by the Academy.
Christian Bale did good work on Hustle but there's no way he deserved a nomination over Hanks, Captain Philips was some of his best work ever.
I know I wasn't the only one that saw it. The main reason I want to smash.Margot Robbie is the new Jaime Pressly...
I thought she was great in American Hustle-Jennifer Lawrence better not win
I thought she was great in American Hustle
I thought Fassbender was the most impressive. I might be bias since he's my favorite actor right now but he killed that role.Honestly, looking back on it Lupita put on the best performance in 12 Years a Slave and only argument I can see against that was she wasn't in it for very very long but to me she was in it just enough for me to feel that way.
Eijifor did his thing no doubt, I felt Solomon's struggle through him but that master's favorite sex thang struggle is REAL.
Honestly, looking back on it Lupita put on the best performance in 12 Years a Slave and only argument I can see against that was she wasn't in it for very very long but to me she was in it just enough for me to feel that way.
Eijifor did his thing no doubt, I felt Solomon's struggle through him but that master's favorite sex thang struggle is REAL.
Revisited The Sting earlier tonight for the second time. Redford and Newman, great movie. For 1973, it had a much older feel to it than that. Well deserved of its Best Picture win that year.
I believe the purpose of that statement was how good Lupita was in 12 Years a Slave, not that Lawrence wasn't good in American Hustle.
Yeah I was the same way too. The show gets good as the season progresses.
The pilot didn't actually do much for me, but I enjoyed the acting. So I gave the second episode a shot and it definitely picks up a little better from there.
On episode 5 now, its getting good
Fassbender and Ejiofor were 100x better then Lupita
On that topic, what did you guys think about Cumerbatch's character?I wouldn't say that much better than Lupita, but I did think they were a touch better.Fassbender and Ejiofor were 100x better then Lupita
Also, I thought Cumberbatch was also phenomenal.
I love Fassbender but maybe I'm hard on him since I know and seen him do better performances. His portrayal was really good but not the best for me, especially amongst racist slave masters in cinematic history.Honestly, looking back on it Lupita put on the best performance in 12 Years a Slave and only argument I can see against that was she wasn't in it for very very long but to me she was in it just enough for me to feel that way.
Eijifor did his thing no doubt, I felt Solomon's struggle through him but that master's favorite sex thang struggle is REAL.
I thought Fassbender was the most impressive. I might be bias since he's my favorite actor right now but he killed that role.Honestly, looking back on it Lupita put on the best performance in 12 Years a Slave and only argument I can see against that was she wasn't in it for very very long but to me she was in it just enough for me to feel that way.
Eijifor did his thing no doubt, I felt Solomon's struggle through him but that master's favorite sex thang struggle is REAL.
Fassbender and Ejiofor were 100x better then Lupita
I didn't think much of Cumberbatch's performance or character. He could've done a lot better if he played a more vital role but he didn't. His character was simply a good man adapting to the times and living the way he had to get by but not enjoying the situation when it came to the more distasteful and abhorrent ways of that life. Him playing the slave master that tried to keep that family together but couldn't afford it and then struggling for a second when Solomon told him the truth of his situation but ultimately couldn't be bothered with it was just about right.Fassbender and Ejiofor were 100x better then Lupita
I wouldn't say that much better than Lupita, but I did think they were a touch better.
Also, I thought Cumberbatch was also phenomenal.
On that topic, what did you guys think about Cumerbatch's character?
In the movie, Solomon and the mother of the children who got separated by Cumerbatch's character purchasing her had this discussion outside their little cabin house. They were arguing and the mother criticized Solomon for being obedient. Solomon said Cumberbatch was an okay man and was only a slavemaster "under the circumstances."
And also, in the press conference, Alfre Woodard said she thought Cumberbatch's character was a good man, her reasoning being essentially the same as Solomons.