- 16,542
- 21,134
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“The intransigence of the commission is pushing us towards no deal,” Fox told the paper. “We have set out the basis in which a deal can happen but if the EU decides that the theological obsession of the unelected is to take priority over the economic wellbeing of the people of Europe then it’s a bureaucrats’ Brexit -- not a people’s Brexit,” and “there is only going to be one outcome.”
The U.K. government has ratcheted up pressure on the EU in recent weeks, urging the bloc to loosen its red lines and come to an accommodation over Brexit. Part of the U.K. strategy involves giving greater visibility for no-deal planning. May has said Britain will publish some 70 technical notes to lay out domestic plans for coping with a scenario without an accord, while Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt warned last week ahead of visits to Paris and Vienna that “we potentially face the prospect of a no-deal by accident.”
May’s office said in an emailed statement Sunday that the government is “confident” of securing a deal with the EU. “However it is the job of a responsible Government to prepare for all scenarios,” it said. “The technical notices we will publish in August and September will set out our plans for a range of exit scenarios in order to guide businesses and the public on how they can best prepare."
Stronger Hand
“It’s essential that ‘no deal’ looks credible to the EU,” Fox said. “If our message on ‘no deal’ is becoming more credible and resonating with those we are negotiating with in Europe, then our negotiating hand is getting stronger every day and we shouldn’t do anything to undermine that.”
Hunt warned that leaving without an agreement would lead to lost jobs in Europe, while Fox on Sunday said that EU leaders must decide whether they want to protect jobs, trade and profit, or “the purity of the EU’s ideology.”
Macron Wooed
May on Friday cut short her holiday in Italy for a meeting with French President Emmanuel Macron. After she finally devised a plan for the post-Brexit economic partnership with the EU last month, Europe’s lead negotiator, Michel Barnier, pushed back against its centerpiece -- a proposal for Britain to collect tariffs at EU rates at its borders in order to maintain a “frictionless” boundary with the bloc.
That’s left May with little room to maneuver because Brexiteers in her party already say the strategy offers too many concessions to the bloc. Former Brexit Minister David Jones used an article in the Sun on Sunday to condemn May’s plan, enshrined in a so-called White Paper, as “Brexit in Name Only,” or Brino.
The aim of the establishment is “to ensure we have such a soft Brexit that it will be as if we had never left,” Jones wrote. “The government’s own Brexit White Paper makes clear that that is the desired outcome.”
Patel, Farage
Another detractor of May’s strategy, former International Development Secretary Priti Patel, wrote in the Sunday Telegraph that the plan fails “by any reasonable standard” to reflect the result of the 2016 EU referendum or to “provide for our future economic prosperity.”
“Our negotiating advantages are meaningless without leadership brave enough for the task,” wrote Patel, often touted in the U.K. press as a potential contender in any future leadership contest to succeed May. The vote for change represented by the result “takes political courage, the kind of courage that appears to have been lacking over the past two years.”
Another Tory with ambitions to succeed May, former Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson, is debating either addressing a rally for Brexit or setting up an organization to promote his leadership credentials in September, the Sunday Times reported. Johnson’s popularity among the party grassroots has risen since he quit May’s cabinet last month because he rejected her Brexit White Paper.
No way. Is that real?
LOL ... this response is on par with the, "Ocasio doesn't have all of the facts, but she gets the gist so it's ok" hypocrites ... God bless ...Feinstein didn't get help from the chinese gov to win her seat nor did the chinese gov hack her opponents campaign.
None of Feinstein's staffers had any security clearance, and on top of that he was a driver. There is nothing to talk about
We've reached peak 2018.
God bless our savior Barack Obama, comrade.LOL ... this response is on par with the, "Ocasio doesn't have all of the facts, but she gets the gist so it's ok" hypocrites ... God bless ...
Look at all this fragile buffooneryLOL ... this response is on par with the, "Ocasio doesn't have all of the facts, but she gets the gist so it's ok" hypocrites ... God bless ...
Get out racist. Your fraud friend got exposed and you’re most likely nextLOL ... this response is on par with the, "Ocasio doesn't have all of the facts, but she gets the gist so it's ok" hypocrites ... God bless ...
What are you talking about?Get out racist. Your fraud friend got exposed and you’re most likely next
We've reached peak 2018.
You're right, comrade. Da libs are shaking in their boots after a lib leader correctly handled a situation related to foreign spies. Da libs need to learn that only Republicans can been seen with foreign spies.I dont see any discussion about Feinstein ... Wonder why ... LOL
LoL, **** outta hereWhat are you talking about?