***Official Political Discussion Thread***

NRA/trump when guns are blamed: "that's ridiculous. look at how many responsible gun owners there are. obviously the guns aren't at fault."

NRA/trump when video games are blamed: "of course. we should ban them all."
These irresponsible video game owners are giving us all bad names! 8bit lives matter! Don't tread on me! Make people present valid drivers licenses to buy games!
 
Looks like he followed through on his reversal to cooperate after all.
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-brief...erg-shows-up-for-mueller-grand-jury-testimony
Nunberg shows up for Mueller grand jury testimony
Former Trump campaign aide Sam Nunberg arrived at a federal court in Washington, D.C., on Friday to testify before a grand jury after threatening to ignore a subpoena from special counsel Robert Mueller.

Nunberg arrived at the courthouse early Friday morning and used the public main entrance to enter the building, according to multiple reports. Politico reports other witnesses, as well as Mueller’s investigators, have typically used nonpublic entrances to enter the courthouse.

When asked by reporters if he would speak following his testimony, Nunberg said “no,” according to Politico.



Nunberg’s testimony comes after a bizarre series of television interviews on Monday in which he revealed he had been subpoenaed by Mueller’s investigators, who demanded he turn over correspondences with Trump and several other top campaign and White House officials.

"When I got the subpoena it was ridiculous to me. Why should I hand them over every email I’ve had with Steve Bannon or Roger Stone since November. Since November of 2015?" Nunberg said during an interview on MSNBC.

The former Trump campaign aide also told The Washington Post that he was summoned to appear before the grand jury but planned to refuse.

“Let him arrest me,” Nunberg told the Post. “Mr. Mueller should understand I am not going in on Friday.”

During the interviews, he also predicted Mueller has evidence of criminal wrongdoing committed by Trump.

“I think he may have done something during the election,” Nunberg told NBC.

The White House denied those claims, calling them incorrect.

Nunberg abruptly reversed course in a Tuesday interview with the Associated Press, saying he would cooperate with Mueller after all.

"I’m going to end up cooperating with them," he said.

It was also reported on Tuesday that Nunberg told Fox Business Network's Charlie Gasparino that he intends to get treatment following the grand jury appearance.

When asked what specifically Nunberg would be treated for, Gasparino referred to a Monday report he provided on Fox Business.

"When I interviewed [Nunberg], and I interviewed him early, he admitted to me he was drinking," Gasparino reported.

"He’s also going to seek treatment for what ails him," he continued. "There’s something. Drinking I believe is a big part of it and that’s what happened yesterday."

Nunberg worked as an aide early in Trump's presidential campaign until he was fired for allegedly breaching a confidentiality agreement and for revelations of racially charged social media posts he wrote in August 2015.
 
My 401k and portfolio are loving it :smokin

Might be time to move into fixed income soon if this tariff starts popping off tho.

Mine as well B. Investing in MERICAN STEEL as we speak. Libs make me sick. Poverty is a mindset B.
 
The jobs report was good. I mean conservatives know nothing about economics and why things are good but this is reason to celebrate because a good economy is the only thing that might stop a blue massacre this fall.

But it is telling that the market didn't freak out because wage growth was not that high. It should be clear at this point how much Wall Street is against labor. And they snitch on themselves constantly
 
Last edited:
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/09/business/economy/jobs-report.html

Corporate executives have long complained about the difficulty of finding workers, particularly in sectors like construction and trucking. Economists have generally reacted with skepticism, arguing that if there were really a shortage of qualified workers, companies would be raising pay to compete for talent.

And after nine consecutive years of steady growth, workers outside of the professional-managerial class are getting two percent raises. American financial centric capitalism is oh so generous.

It's funny how the majority of the capitalist classes (especially the petite bourgeoisie) as well as the professional-managerial class love applying econ 1 concepts to complex situations, they especially hate minimum wage hikes and cite highly simplified, perfect market labor market models when doing so. But once they realize they might have to pay "unskilled" workers more money, suddenly econ goes out the window. They can't find PhD credentialed physicists to work in their factory for 10 bucks an hour, time to blame millennial culture for a lack of workers who will work for well below the market rate. Can't retain talent in a tightening job market? Blame a lack of grit on the part of younger workers.

Now that the labor market has really tightened (at least in parts of the country and the economy that the bourgeois center-left and center-right press actually care about), we see ridiculous articles like "18 Ways to attract workers: More bounce houses and bean bag chairs." Here is a radical idea, pay more money, quite a bit more money and you'll get workers. It's simple economics, the thing that the ruling class loves to trot out in every other discussion.

I would have most of the business owners and managers thrown out of a plane but sadly, people from the proletariat would soon take their place. We need a drastic social and political reorganization. When two to three percent raises are good news after decades of stagnation, when this is probably the best that the masses are gonna get (by design, capitalism produces downturns and we are due for a big one) then we need something completely new.
 
Back
Top Bottom