***Official Political Discussion Thread***

IMG_0974.jpeg


IMG_0976.jpeg
 
They took a picture of themselves taking another weirdo picture.
Brilliant.
 
Not sure this is a given:


1723299687810.png


While the graph highlights that young women have turned more liberal overtime, efforts still need to be made to make sure that more young men see how the Democratic party will benefit them.

There certainly is a sizable minority of Gen Z who are pissed off young men, particularly those on the wrong end of a growing cultural and economic education chasm.

Their sheer numbers aren’t that scary but their level of intensity for reactionary politics is very high. That is a major concern.

But I think they’ll be checked by their generation’s intensly left faction in conjunction with the fact that the median Gen Z voter will likely remain econ left and socially laissez-faire.

Obviously, they or any generation could become arch reactionaries given certain material conditions. But assuming that the next 10, 20 years are like the last 40, 50 years, they’ll be a powerful left leaning political force in electoral politics.

The home-equity-as-retirement pyramid scheme that started in the 1970’s, to offset stagnating wages and a decline of defined benefits pensions, is narrowing to the point that a majority of adults will won’t have access to it and something will have to give politically and economically.

I think we could see large scale construction of high quality public housing in major cities and a more robust social welfare state. It would unlock levels of material prosperity never before seen and it will be totally untethered to landownership.

Affordable housing will cause even more human capital flight from rural to urban areas and I could see the pissed of young men remaining in rural areas, bankrolled by a declining rural economic elite, forming terrorist cells to pressure the now firmly center-left Federal government to grant them economic concessions and/or autonomy or political independence.


So in short, there is indeed a violent minority of Gen z who need to be reckoned with, ideally by using the state to make life better in rural areas even as the market seems rural areas worth less than ever. If you can get some of those pissed off young men better economic prospects in the countryside, the call to violence will not be headed, at least not in an organized way.

However, the majority of Gen Z will likely only become more urban, well educated, and less invested in personal homeownership, which exists largely to keep large chunks of the workforce identifying with the very wealthy. So Gen Z will likely live in a mid 21st century in material conditions that tend to pull people leftward politically.
 
Back
Top Bottom