- Jan 3, 2004
- 29,014
- 4,130
Nothing to do with eye test doe.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
anyone think they sent Mav back up too quickly after Goose died?
anyone think they sent Mav back up too quickly after Goose died?
Sent him where?
anyone think they sent Mav back up too quickly after Goose died?
Sent him where?
I will reply to it. Yes, the 4 Superbowls is an amazing accomplishment. 2 Superbowl MVPs is also a great accomplishment. Great items to add to his resume.Nobody gonna quote this and explain the Terry paradox? Does everyone think he's top 5 and I'm assuming they don't?Terry Bradshaw is actually the perfect example of numbers and titles not telling the whole story. His numbers in respect to his era were all time great. He doesn't get top 5 consideration from anyone I know.
Are Paytons numbers greater then the 3 SBs? That's what I was getting at earlier. How do folks factor in SB and numbers. It seems done at random when it benefits their argument.
I mean 4 SBs with accomplishments. Retiring high in stats. Why wouldn't he be better then everyone but Brady in this pass happy, anti defense era?
I will reply to it. Yes, the 4 Superbowls is an amazing accomplishment. 2 Superbowl MVPs is also a great accomplishment. Great items to add to his resume.
However, the rest of his resume simply does not stack up to other greats. 1 MVP, 1 All Pro (same year as his MVP), and 3 Pro Bowls. Simply put, his accolades do not match up with others that are considered all time greats.
You say high in stats? Laughable claim. Obviously, his stats are nothing compared to modern stats, but I am not even talking about that. I am speaking in terms of his era. He finished 1st in TD passes in a season once, and the majority of the time the wasn't in the top 5 (or often times he wasnt even in the top 10). The majority of his career, he wasn't in the top 5 in passing yards (or often times he wasnt even in the top 10). Where are these stats you are speaking of?
I'm too young to have watched Bradshaw play, so the eye test is out of the equation.
So out of Superbowls, personal accomplishments, and statistics, the only thing that you can say was exceptional was his Superbowls. THAT is why he is often not included in peoples top 5 or 10 list.
Simply put, you just don't seem to understand that its not just ONE thing that we judge players on. Its a number of things. And Bradshaw only really excelled at one of those number of things.
But it is all about the eye test
And when TB retired he was a top 10 QB all time. Then many have passed since
But why are we debating QBs? You said Irvin was the best, had no factual evidence to prove it, had no members in agreement, but continue these straw man arguments to try to convince us in some weird way (which it hasn't)
But numbers did prove it. AR12 had superior numbers across the board besides SB wins. And clearly those weren't going to match at the point in his career
But why are we debating QBs? You said Irvin was the best, had no factual evidence to prove it, had no members in agreement, but continue these straw man arguments to try to convince us in some weird way (which it hasn't)
there is a difference between talent and what is accomplished
I firmly believe Mario Lemieux was the most talented hockey player to ever play but Wayne Gretzky is the GOAT
You didn't read what I said. At the time he won his first SB. All the years after prove it sure but I didn't have to see anymore to say he's better. His numbers and accolades to that point didn't surpass TB by much if at all. I'd have to look and see what Rodgers totals were up until his first SB win.
My last post wasn't to address Irvin vs Rice. It was to show how the same argument can look silly either way. Folks pick and choose when to use what type of metric.
Aaron Rodgers has one SB. In 2010, if he quit, people would have Bradshaw as the better career but seen AR12 as a better talent. His per game/year numbers showcases this along with the variables such as eye test, competitors opinions, etc
there is a difference between talent and what is accomplished
I firmly believe Mario Lemieux was the most talented hockey player to ever play but Wayne Gretzky is the GOAT
Injuries/cancer
He was though
So Tannehill admitted to talking greasy to the dudes on the practice squad.
Dude admitted it on the record.
Is my dude CP still gonna say it didn't happen?