- Jun 1, 2011
- 107,074
- 79,491
Pau for Amare?? That's damn near a lateral move
Straight dying from those last two pages
Straight dying from those last two pages
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Pau for Amare?? That'sdamn nearalateral movetremendous downgrade by LA.
Pau for Amare?? That'sdamn nearalateral movetremendous downgrade by LA.
Couldn't agree more.
i agree...pau for j smoove is stupid...i hate hearing that...Any move other than Pau for Aldridge or Love in some capacity is a downgrade.
I had a 30 minute argument about this today. Cant believe people honestly think that this is a good look for LA. In what world would putting D Howard next to D Howard point five be a good move......i agree...pau for j smoove is stupid...i hate hearing that...Any move other than Pau for Aldridge or Love in some capacity is a downgrade.
Pau for Amare is like trading one bad vagina for an equally loose vagina
Would fit better with Mike D than Amare or Pau.Not that I'm for or against the move, but Josh Smith is really good.
I had a 30 minute argument about this today. Cant believe people honestly think that this is a good look for LA. In what world would putting D Howard next to D Howard point five be a good move......i agree...pau for j smoove is stupid...i hate hearing that...Any move other than Pau for Aldridge or Love in some capacity is a downgrade.
when did this happen???I guess if you were looking at trying to make a faster offense, and more formidable defense..
But I think the lure of the trade is people thinking the Lakers will get multiple shooters with Smith... Which unless Smith says "I want to be traded because I'm not resigning." (He no longer holds this position... It's not happening for the Lakers. They turned down Teague + Smith for Pau this off-season..
when did this happen???I guess if you were looking at trying to make a faster offense, and more formidable defense..
But I think the lure of the trade is people thinking the Lakers will get multiple shooters with Smith... Which unless Smith says "I want to be traded because I'm not resigning." (He no longer holds this position... It's not happening for the Lakers. They turned down Teague + Smith for Pau this off-season..
thanks. never knew this happened.Between the NBA Draft and before Joe Johnson trade.
"The Hawks balked at a potential deal with the Lakers for Pau Gasol because L.A. wanted another major piece to go along with Smith. That would leave the Hawks with less than six players under contract, less talent, and no short-term cap relief because of the $38 million and two years remaining on Gasol’s contract.