- 31,964
- 1,056
??? if u can play, and have great usedr skills, u can win with any team
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
there are people at EA who are higher ups and programmers who frequent OS Forum, they frequently answer questions and post all the info we ask for
Originally Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
........ that used to be the case, until this year when a bum squad will play like a bum squad ... i mean they already said if your qb sucks in real life he will suck in the game and youll have to run ... that takes away half of the nfl right there ...
i won tournaments with houston last year, the way they are describing the ratings system that wont be possible ...
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
??? if u can play, and have great usedr skills, u can win with any team
I wouldn't say no more glitches or cheesing crap , people will always find way to cheat onlineOriginally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Originally Posted by Emmanuel Goldstein
........ that used to be the case, until this year when a bum squad will play like a bum squad ... i mean they already said if your qb sucks in real life he will suck in the game and youll have to run ... that takes away half of the nfl right there ...
i won tournaments with houston last year, the way they are describing the ratings system that wont be possible ...
Learn to play football. That will eliminate half your problems. No more Ortiz glitching cheesing crap.
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
Learn to play football. That will eliminate half your problems. No more Ortiz glitching cheesing crap.
Yup, that's how I can be above .500 online with the Raiders.
the raiders online with the running play scheme wasUNSTOPPABLE ... over .500? i dont think i lost with them bamas ...
^ I see what you're saying. Basically that if you are playing with someone who is around the same skill level as you, there is NO WAY you're beating them with the Raiders/Bengals if they are the Chargers/Steelers
this ... thanks
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
GOODBYE RUN AND CHUCKERS!!!
Originally Posted by YaBoyDiddy
Is it me or does 10 look like 2K?
It's about time they got on board with them 2K player models. I never cared for 2K but I respected their player models and loved their animations. The QBs finally look like they're 6'4'' standing tall in the pocket...the Lineman actually look like 6'6'' hulking lineman. They're losing that cartoony look. Now all they gotta do is fix that running animation
Why they still look like they jogging? ...what's that about?
Originally Posted by TheWindScar31
Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
GOODBYE RUN AND CHUCKERS!!!
Amen.
xcg11pinoYx wrote:
AIR Jourdane wrote:
Looks pretty good to me
OWWWWW! I'm excited now
I mean in the video the dudes that are playing aren't really trying to run outside the pocket.? Maybe they can't, but I would like to see them try.Just to see what happens. I'm optimistic this year about Madden. I'm just doing my research.
And how is the man coverage? There wasn't one CB in the league that could defend the slant on Madden last year. I know Corners get beat but damn.
Edit: I thought that was the vid that Jet posted. I just seen the one he posted and now I'm excited. Its good to see them putting work into this yearsMadde. But as good as that vid was, it doesn't answer my Man coverage questions.
not much of an accomplishment.Originally Posted by AG 47
Originally Posted by GUNNA GET IT
??? if u can play, and have great usedr skills, u can win with any team
Yup, that's how I can be above .500 online with the Raiders.
YESSSSSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Originally Posted by Jetpacunlimited
- Return of Defensive Assignments (Defensive Playmaker)
not much of an accomplishment.Originally Posted by Al3xis
Originally Posted by AG 47
GUNNA GET IT wrote:
??? if u can play, and have great usedr skills, u can win with any team
Yup, that's how I can be above .500 online with the Raiders.
[h1]Cleveland Browns[/h1]
Position Name OVR QB B. Quinn 71 QB . Anderson 70 QB B. Ratliff 51
RB J. Lewis 85 RB J. Harrison 71 RB J. Davis 68 RB N. Herron 67
FB L. Vickers 88
WR B. Edwards 86 WR B. Robiskie 73 WR M. Massaqoui 71 WR . Patten 69 WR J. Cribbs 63 WR P. Hubbard 43
TE S. Heiden 75 TE R. Royal 74 TE M. Rucker 70
OL J. Thomas 97 OL E. Steinbach 93 OL A. Mack 79 OL H. Fraley 79 OL R. Tucker 78 OL F. Womack 76 OL J. St. Clair 73 OL R. Hadnot 72 OL G. Foster 66 OL I. Sowells 65
DL S. Rogers 92 DL C. Williams 81 DL K. Coleman 79 DL R. Smith 77 DL S. Smith 74 DL . Veikune 68 DL A. Rubin 61 DL C. Mosley 59
LB . Jackson 86 LB E. Barton 79 LB K. Wimbley 78 LB L. Williams 71 LB . Veikune 68 LB . Bowens 67 LB A. Hall 61 LB K. Maiava 59 LB . Holloway 50
CB E. Wright 79 CB B. McDonald 71 CB C. Francies 69 CB C. Ivy 68 CB H. Poteat 65 CB . Carey 61
S B. Pool 77 S A. Elam 72 S M. Adams 65 S N. Sorensen 52
K P. Dawson 80
P . Zastudil 77
Braylon. 86 overall...
Daaaannnnngg.....
Originally Posted by outacontrol music
[h1]Cleveland Browns[/h1]
Position Name OVR QB B. Quinn 71 QB . Anderson70 QB B. Ratliff 51
RB J. Lewis 85 RB J. Harrison 71 RB J. Davis 68 RB N. Herron 67
FB L. Vickers 88
WR B. Edwards 86 WR B. Robiskie 73 WR M. Massaqoui 71 WR . Patten69 WR J. Cribbs 63 WR P. Hubbard 43
TE S. Heiden 75 TE R. Royal 74 TE M. Rucker 70
OL J. Thomas 97 OL E. Steinbach 93 OL A. Mack 79 OL H. Fraley 79 OL R. Tucker 78 OL F. Womack 76 OL J. St. Clair 73 OL R. Hadnot 72 OL G. Foster 66 OL I. Sowells 65
DL S. Rogers 92 DL C. Williams 81 DL K. Coleman 79 DL R. Smith 77 DL S. Smith 74 DL . Veikune68 DL A. Rubin 61 DL C. Mosley 59
LB . Jackson86 LB E. Barton 79 LB K. Wimbley 78 LB L. Williams 71 LB . Veikune68 LB . Bowens67 LB A. Hall 61 LB K. Maiava 59 LB . Holloway50
CB E. Wright 79 CB B. McDonald 71 CB C. Francies 69 CB C. Ivy 68 CB H. Poteat 65 CB . Carey61
S B. Pool 77 S A. Elam 72 S M. Adams 65 S N. Sorensen 52
K P. Dawson 80
P . Zastudil77
Return of last gen layout playbooks
Mix/Match Uniforms (jerseys, helmets, socks, etc.)
These two improvements please me.