- 7,004
- 291
TAAATE!!! g
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tate getting interviewed..
: did you push off?
tate: i dont know what you're talking. i don't know..i dont know what you're talking about.
The reason is because Seattle didn't win the game. That was a W for the Packers, anyone who believes otherwise doesn't know football. Not only do you miss an OPI (understandable in the situation), but the defender intercepted the ball, yet they call it a touchdown. The point is, it's deservedly so that people aren't talking about Seattle winning the game, because they really didn't. They played very well, I'll give them that, no question. But tonight we saw the integrity of the NFL get absolutely torn apart by incompetent, and possibly Vegas-betting refs.
I have 20 30 vision my dude. In the air, he only had 1 hand on it, but by the time they came to the ground (the deciding factor on whether a catch is made or not) he had two on it.
Simultaneous possession. Get it over it.
Doesn't matter. You can argue that Tate had two hands on it initially when Jennings had two hands also. But Tate's right hands comes off the ball. As soon as that happens, Jennings wins possession.
Doesn't matter. You can argue that Tate had two hands on it initially when Jennings had two hands also. But Tate's right hands comes off the ball. As soon as that happens, Jennings wins possession.
Doesn't matter. You can argue that Tate had two hands on it initially when Jennings had two hands also. But Tate's right hands comes off the ball. As soon as that happens, Jennings wins possession.
Doesn't matter. You can argue that Tate had two hands on it initially when Jennings had two hands also. But Tate's right hands comes off the ball. As soon as that happens, Jennings wins possession.
Doesn't matter. You can argue that Tate had two hands on it initially when Jennings had two hands also. But Tate's right hands comes off the ball. As soon as that happens, Jennings wins possession.
Doesn't matter. You can argue that Tate had two hands on it initially when Jennings had two hands also. But Tate's right hands comes off the ball. As soon as that happens, Jennings wins possession.
lmao...Stuart Scott just said Wilson threw a game winning INTERCEPTION
LOLI think the worst thing about the call is that it is going to completely take away from the fact that Seattle won the game.
Of course not, fool. But you calling the Seahawks players 'clowns,' 'cornballs,' 'turds,' and finishing off your post with the classic passive-aggressive "they arent going anywhere anyways; enjoy the fluke win" statement proves that YOU are salty. Most other people in here are being objective and voicing their opinion without the ridiculous hate.The salt in this post
word everyone who thinks its an INT is "salty" and must be a packer fan.
You really think players are going to skip out on paychecks?Russell Wilson with the most awkward SC post game interview.
How long til players and coaches start protesting and refusing to play?
I have 20 30 vision my dude. In the air, he only had 1 hand on it, but by the time they came to the ground (the deciding factor on whether a catch is made or not) he had two on it.It's not an interception unless you come down with it.
By the time he came down to the ground, both players had their hands on the rock.
Simultaneous possession goes to the offense.
Dude are you blind??? Seriously! Answer me!
How can you have possession with only one hand? Jennings had full possession of the ball
Get your eyes checked sir
Simultaneous possession. Get it over it.
Quote of the season
People and their selective memory...The Packers line survived by holding on every damn play..and of course that terrible call..Some of you guys are forgetting the horrible PI call that was called on Kam on the go ahead TD drive for the Packers. That dictated the game as well.
Come on guys I didn't mean it like that. I just meant the fact that the Seahawks played very well and dominated the Packers for the most part and that call is going to overshadow everything.
Originally Posted by CertifiedSW View Post
I think the worst thing about the call is that it is going to completely take away from the fact that Seattle won the game.
^ Again, no one is saying its not a PI. Name the last time a PI was called on a last second toss up.
This. Like I said, replacement refs are the only reason the packers were even in it.Some of you guys are forgetting the horrible PI call that was called on Kam on the go ahead TD drive for the Packers. That dictated the game as well.
People and their selective memory...The Packers line survived by holding on every damn play..and of course that terrible call..
Packers would have been put in a situation to attempt a FG