Beans
formerly beans718
- 10,705
- 10,232
Some of the charges were tied to their refusal to provide information thus obstructing an investigation (one of the few charges that stuck) so the onus was on them . Also this article below clearly says “Judgment rules that much of Uefa’s case was ‘time-barred’”.. so clearly those limitations impacted the ruling. Paint it however you want.. it’s fishy af that all of your larger sponsors happen to be owned by the same ppl that own your club.. cmon man people aren’t that naiveBecause there’s a legal way of doing things. The onus wasn’t on Man City’s owners to prove they were innocent at that time.
Cas releases its reasons for overturning Manchester City's Europe ban | Manchester City | The Guardian
The court of arbitration for sport’s judgment on the case involving Manchester City has been released
amp.theguardian.com