- 12,037
- 2,686
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2001
One of these people is bound to kill her.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by MrYoungMoney
That verdict was insane!
I don't know what that Jury was thinking!
Poor Caylee...
It was reported the longest she could face is 4 years...
Prosecutors ****ed it all up. This wasn't a murder one case. They should have gone for a lesser charge but they wanted to be heroes and famous.
did she probably have something to do with the death? Yes.
Was there enough evidence beyond common sense? No.
That's the U.S. brehs. Lucky we live here.
Originally Posted by cmoneymontana
Oh yeah, your 2 year old is missing for a month before you report it. That is ok, you are too busy getting tatted up, and clubbin.Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by Los Angeles Fresh
Vick went to jail for a gambling ring, not for killing a dog. When will people get this through their head? PETA just hopped on the case to make him look worse.
- people like this are just slow, they couldnt understand it if they tried.
....these are the same type of individuals that were saying Martha Stewart went to prison for insider trading when EVERYONE does it. when the truth is Martha Stewart went to prison for LYING about it.
Like Cedric Ceballos said, any non attractive white woman does this, it is a wrap for you, straight up.
Why is this surprising? She was acquitted of all the charges that carried longer prison sentences, and convicted of four charges that carried one year each max. So that adds up to 4 years. She's apparently gonna be credited 3.5 for the time she's been in jail since the arrest, so the MOST she could serve going forwards is like 6 months. And that's assuming she is sentenced to the max for each count, which isn't guaranteed.Originally Posted by moundraised23
wait.............whatOriginally Posted by MrYoungMoney
That verdict was insane!
I don't know what that Jury was thinking!
Poor Caylee...
It was reported the longest she could face is 4 years...
one1 1 1 wrote:
LOL at kim kardshain and her twitter
she is a air head
Kim K out here examining verdicts and $+%+
Can't believe this chick got off though
You really think a prosecutor in a case with this much media coverage and this sort of fact pattern could have headlined the case with anything but first degree murder? Might have led to more time for the defendant but that was never an option for the prosecutor.Originally Posted by Tunnel Vision
Prosecutors ****ed it all up. This wasn't a murder one case. They should have gone for a lesser charge but they wanted to be heroes and famous.
did she probably have something to do with the death? Yes.
Was there enough evidence beyond common sense? No.
That's the U.S. brehs. Lucky we live here.
Originally Posted by KatieJade4
If I DO resemble Casey Anthony in any way... I am keeping my %#$ in the house.
People want her dead
Originally Posted by Checks McGee
puzzled to why people care so much about this, !$$% like this happens every day........
Originally Posted by YoUNg bR3aD
excuse my ignorance...
But where is the childs father?
Is he not in the picture??
Originally Posted by Ghenges
Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican
Originally Posted by Ghenges
Because it's on t.v.
Fool I am asking why is this one getting the media attention that it is. Of course it is on TV, that is why I am even asking the question.
Because people are interested in it.
Originally Posted by rashi
All of you want to convict her. Based on what? The government had all the advantages to wrap this up, unlimited resources, and yet couldn't prove anything. There's isn't a murder weapon, their motive was weak. The Judge was clearly prosecution leaning, every single media outlet was hammering and hammering on the defense (in which I was critical on his approach) for the past month and still couldn't convict her based on the evidence presented.
It's not about what you know, or what you think, it's about what you can prove. Clearly, today showed the government couldn't prove a damn thing.
I think George Anthony was the most disappointed after hearing the verdict.
Originally Posted by seasoned vet
Originally Posted by rashi
All of you want to convict her. Based on what? The government had all the advantages to wrap this up, unlimited resources, and yet couldn't prove anything. There's isn't a murder weapon, their motive was weak. The Judge was clearly prosecution leaning, every single media outlet was hammering and hammering on the defense (in which I was critical on his approach) for the past month and still couldn't convict her based on the evidence presented.
It's not about what you know, or what you think, it's about what you can prove. Clearly, today showed the government couldn't prove a damn thing.
I think George Anthony was the most disappointed after hearing the verdict.
You really think a prosecutor in a case with this much media coverage and this sort of fact pattern could have headlined the case with anything but first degree murder? Might have led to more time for the defendant but that was never an option for the prosecutor.Originally Posted by PersiaFly
Originally Posted by Tunnel Vision
Prosecutors ****ed it all up. This wasn't a murder one case. They should have gone for a lesser charge but they wanted to be heroes and famous.
did she probably have something to do with the death? Yes.
Was there enough evidence beyond common sense? No.
That's the U.S. brehs. Lucky we live here.
agreed,Originally Posted by Jada2001Retro
No one knows who the father is, as you've heard in the case, she is a BIG %#$##.Originally Posted by YoUNg bR3aD
excuse my ignorance...
But where is the childs father?
Is he not in the picture??