- 1,129
- 41
the best packs to me were the 6/17, 7/16 and 11/12
the best individuals were the 3s and 4s
the best individuals were the 3s and 4s
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THAT AS WELL...Originally Posted by 1Airjordan 23K
Anyone buy all the pack??
If so, someone post picture of shoes lined up 1-22 !!
Originally Posted by hjdunks26
I only purchased the 11/12 pack mainly because I never had any Jordan XIIs, but from seeing all the packs in person I can definitely say that the quality sucked. Any of the CDPs had nothing on JB 1999-2001 retros. It was also frustrating...and I know it was part of JB's marketing scheme to package the shoes so that there would usually be one hot shoe that everyone wanted and typically another shoe that leaned towards being not-so-popular with consumers and Jordan fans alike. This fact alone prevented me from buying all packs except the 11/12, which I don't really regret because it saved me a lot of money in 2008.
But I think the general feeling is that JB could have executed the releases better and brought quality back to retros for one last fling. But with that being said, why would they do that? Many people (including myself) were willing to purchase one/or many CDPs of sub-par and low quality shoes for $310 each. And at the end of day, JB and Nike are for-profit companies who will try to make money by increasing their profit margin by increasing sales and lowering costs by reducing the quality and cost to produce each shoe.
From another perspective, it was good to have some retros release for the first time like the Carmines, and some other retros re-release to give younger Jordan fans a chance to cop shoes they may have missed out on years before like the Cement IVs.
Sorry for the long post, just my opinion and what I see.