- Apr 4, 2016
- 18,833
- 10,997
This morning 10AM Eastern on FTL
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro Low OG Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by quise2024,
- Start date
- Aug 9, 2014
- 12,841
- 27,945
Interesting shoeSuch a unique low. Glad I picked this one up, don’t have anything like it. Also love that it came with 3 pairs of laces.
This is the first time I’ve noticed you post an actual picture lol. Def don’t recall seeing an on-foot before though
- Jan 18, 2004
- 2,038
- 3,387
Those ghost greens look better every time I see them.
- Feb 19, 2018
- 58
- 130
Why, why, why does Jordan Brand always have to pull **** like this. If the swoosh was big like the '15's they would be just fine.
- Sep 16, 2012
- 1,201
- 2,299
- Feb 6, 2011
- 40,141
- 11,080
For a euro only drop they lingered in my sz at least ... I bought 2 without trying that hard & could've had more... folks ain’t care about the OG lows when they dropped.They were so difficult to get
- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,629
- 27,195
- Jul 3, 2013
- 3,597
- 8,059
DA5551-400
2
225159
Guest
Hard no look passDA5551-400
- Nov 12, 2005
- 1,664
- 4,347
These already dropped. Women's exclusive.DA5551-400
- Jul 18, 2016
- 91
- 119
Picked up the ghost green lows and Japan metallic 1s today for $350 packaged deal. Little drive but worth it to have the ghost greens finally!
- Feb 6, 2011
- 40,141
- 11,080
You gave him $15 on top per pair... huge W
- Feb 10, 2014
- 4,037
- 9,704
Anyone notice these bastards have 7 lace holes compared to the OG 8????? Awwwwwww
I am knitpicking at this point
- Nov 16, 2018
- 31,417
- 65,440
- Feb 21, 2019
- 2,342
- 3,155
I'm usually not the biggest stickler but those swooshes might be a no go on NGs for me. Thinking it's a pass.
- Nov 16, 2018
- 31,417
- 65,440
When I buy those ng lows I'm gonna be waisting money. I'm pretty sure I spelt that wrong, but I can't remember the correct way atm.
- Jan 21, 2016
- 652
- 1,414
Wasting, brother. English is a stupid language.
- Aug 22, 2012
- 432
- 1,126
Lol so these new “OG” lows just have a different tounge with Nike air and cost $40 more than the non OG right?. Oh and I guess better quality 
- Jan 21, 2016
- 652
- 1,414
I find them to have a roomier toe box and a softer, shorter tongue. I love my OG lows and are rather ‘meh’ about the few pairs of phats I have in the collection.Lol so these new “OG” lows just have a different tounge with Nike air and cost $40 more than the non OG right?. Oh and I guess better quality
- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,629
- 27,195
Yea I’m just gonna sit them out. I love this shoe but they did some lazy ****. I’m annoyed 
- Apr 25, 2005
- 33,427
- 39,199
Same here. I was going to cop but the changes they made really annoy me now. I copped the Centre Court today instead.Yea I’m just gonna sit them out. I love this shoe but they did some lazy ****. I’m annoyed
- Apr 4, 2016
- 18,833
- 10,997
Send a cpl pics of those to my first coach and the in hand pics looks much better than stock photo.
- Sep 6, 2000
- 10,778
- 18,322
Lol so these new “OG” lows just have a different tounge with Nike air and cost $40 more than the non OG right?. Oh and I guess better quality
No, the whole cut is different. The non OG/phat or whatever are cut a little higher at the ankle, extra leather, no heel tab, wings stitched into the heel, etc. Here's the UNC Koston OG vs the phat UNC...
- Aug 22, 2012
- 432
- 1,126
No, the whole cut is different. The non OG/phat or whatever are cut a little higher at the ankle, extra leather, no heel tab, wings stitched into the heel, etc. Here's the UNC Koston OG vs the phat UNC...
Thanks. Hopefully I can get an upcoming pair for retail. Really wanted the orange but it’a not looking like “shattered backboard” orange
