- 20,062
- 10,946
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2009
Where's the comparison pics?i came to compare lm to fragments
Six posts up. By comparison he meant that he came in here to say he preferred the Lance Mountains to the Fragments.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Where's the comparison pics?i came to compare lm to fragments
Yep. Not sure which I like moreFragments immediately made me think of these
He posts fakes all the time and a week late GM sellers have the exact same shoes for sale. Just like the white jordan shines, he posted them right before other GM sellers had "samples" for sale.
He posted the columbia IV "remastered" same time as every GM seller put them up for sale
just by doing my research and timelines, im assuming they are high quality fakes.
Is there sample pairs out there that are legit? most likely since they would be used to make these fakes.
i think most of the crap dude posts is high quality fakes and he just posts them first for everyone to see.
how are the first pics we see of the shoe of fakes tho?
why would they make fakes before they even know if people like that shoe
Fragment
Repped. Good eye. Definitely glad to see how true to OG this is. If this really is legit, bravo JB/Nike.anyone else notice the tongue at all?
looks they have really gone back to the OG where the lace loop was cut into the nylon tongue rather than what the 2013's had it stitched on.
looks nicely padded too.
small detail but a good thing to see.
Why u keep doin disfakes have it cut into the nylon
SRS
Height, collars, toebox shape, heel tab, size of the swoosh, side panels. Many differencesI don't understand the difference between the mold. Besides quality obviously what is a big difference between say the 13 breds vs og 85 pair with just the mold?
i get all releases..all arent fake just from Guadong and Putian!Do your homework