- Nov 26, 2015
- 24,441
- 22,120
Someone actually paid $300 for the 2013 version while they could have saved for the 2015 version
Consumers cut corners just as much as the brand does.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone actually paid $300 for the 2013 version while they could have saved for the 2015 version
They look great fam god bless have a great nightNot bad. About the eighth time I wore them.
Just sold my 2013 Chicago's for $300 on ebay, Spidermans here I come
I'm glad theres no hype/demand for Spiderman 1s. Should he a easy grab
I think people are out for them
let's hope not tho
Great move. Spider-Man quality blows 2013’s out of the water. Trust me.
Spider-Man has always been wack anyway.
I’m serious. He’s too kid-like.
Doesn’t matter to me, not into comics as an adult.
Me neither... but you’re still coppin?
Sail works too..Black laces for the pines nothing more to say
personally I still wouldn't, even if the 2013 quality is trash. Because judging by the value he sold it at, it's roughly the same as the spidey 1's value (so far). So if you're not looking at value aside, I'd much rather have the chicago in its true form than a translucent, 3M dotted spideys
Never too old to enjoy comics.
personally I still wouldn't, even if the 2013 quality is trash. Because judging by the value he sold it at, it's roughly the same as the spidey 1's value (so far). So if you're not looking at value aside, I'd much rather have the chicago in its true form than a translucent, 3M dotted spideys