- 2,872
- 938
- Joined
- May 8, 2004
my bad didnt know there was a separate thread for them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
I take it good condition is used don't pay over retail.Sold a pair of shoes so now i have some house money to play with. Thinking about pulling the trigger on another pair but need help deciding between the two.
Banned or Black Lance Mountains?
Difference between the two is $10 and both in very good condition.
I'm guessing you mean 2016 black/red, not 2011 banned? If so, it's still your preference. I haven't been paying attention to 2016 black/red prices, but Lance Mountains have been going for much cheaper as far as I've seen. You shouldn't be paying over $275 for worn IMO. Just trying to help you gauge what would be a better deal.Sold a pair of shoes so now i have some house money to play with. Thinking about pulling the trigger on another pair but need help deciding between the two.
Banned or Black Lance Mountains?
Difference between the two is $10 and both in very good condition.
Sold a pair of shoes so now i have some house money to play with. Thinking about pulling the trigger on another pair but need help deciding between the two.
Banned or Black Lance Mountains?
Difference between the two is $10 and both in very good condition.
i would think the LM 1's would become scarce faster than banned'sWhichever one you like more.
If it's a tie, maybe flip a coin?
I think it'll be a few years before we get another black red 1 retro but who knows if we ever get more lance mountains. Not sure if that'll help make a choice.
Don't pay over $275 for worn shoes? You're joking right!?!?I'm guessing you mean 2016 black/red, not 2011 banned? If so, it's still your preference. I haven't been paying attention to 2016 black/red prices, but Lance Mountains have been going for much cheaper as far as I've seen. You shouldn't be paying over $275 for worn IMO. Just trying to help you gauge what would be a better deal.
I am not going to get into a discussion with you about production costs, retail price, resale value, and personal value. I'm sure you can find enough information about that in the thousands of pages in this thread already. I gave the person who asked a question about a pair of Lance Mountain 1s, a pair that I own, an opinion based on my experience of shopping for that shoe and paying an after-market resale price. Thank you for reading and I hope you can understand the variables that influence shoe prices.Don't pay over $275 for worn shoes? You're joking right!?!?
for a minute I thought they were doing another release like th 1.5s. wonder if the customizer knows about these-
someone customized the 1.5's on a dunk sole
Whichever one you like more.
If it's a tie, maybe flip a coin?
I think it'll be a few years before we get another black red 1 retro but who knows if we ever get more lance mountains. Not sure if that'll help make a choice.
for a minute I thought they were doing another release like th 1.5s. wonder if the customizer knows about these-
I think the Flyknit Jordan 1s are a metaphor for all of Nike/JBs creative problems right now... Instead of innovating and taking risks like Adidas is doing, they just throw a bunch of crap that is already popular (Flyknit, AJ 1, Bred cw) together and call it a day lol
what risks are adidas taking? they are just releasing 100 colorways of NMDs and another 100 of UBs each quarter.
Risk and adidas dont belong in the same sentence.
take a step back from the keyboard and take a breath pa. You looking too deeply into thisI think the Flyknit Jordan 1s are a metaphor for all of Nike/JBs creative problems right now... Instead of innovating and taking risks like Adidas is doing, they just throw a bunch of crap that is already popular (Flyknit, AJ 1, Bred cw) together and call it a day lol.
take a step back from the keyboard and take a breath pa. You looking too deeply into this
who hurt you b? I was just messing with you because of the whole metaphor thing in the post which is why I quoted it and said you looking too deep, sheesh. If anyone here is a snowflake it's definitely youSorry, for offending you, Snowflake-it honestly wasn't meant to be a personal critique of anyone's tastes.
who hurt you b? I was just messing with you because of the whole metaphor thing in the post which is why I quoted it and said you looking too deep, sheesh. If anyone here is a snowflake it's definitely you
Risk would mean a gamble which would mean losing revenue. Nike didnt even lose anything with the vlone incident."Risks" as in collabs and new models (including the R2 and new UB silhouettes), plus the fact that Nike/JB has been using some combination of Air/Zoom and Lunar for how many years now? At least they are trying to push React now but what tech are they pushing to compete with Boost, or can we just expect more Zoom for another 20 years? I'm honestly surprised I have to explain this to you guys-I guess I shouldn't overestimate the average NT poster. It's also ironic you mention that Adidas puts out too many cws when there are retros that are literally rotting on shelves because JB flooded the market so much.
But, anyways, the AJ 1 Off-White is a creative risk for Nike/JB and, although I don't like it, it is a step in the right direction.
Risk would mean a gamble which would mean losing revenue. Nike didnt even lose anything with the vlone incident.
I take it good condition is used don't pay over retail.
I'm guessing you mean 2016 black/red, not 2011 banned? If so, it's still your preference. I haven't been paying attention to 2016 black/red prices, but Lance Mountains have been going for much cheaper as far as I've seen. You shouldn't be paying over $275 for worn IMO. Just trying to help you gauge what would be a better deal.