D
Official Air Jordan 1 Retro High Thread Vol: Best Model/Thread
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Oct 19, 2013
- 2,447
- 3,465
- Apr 22, 2012
- 85,111
- 113,889
I'm goodJust cop DSM's
Last edited:
- Nov 12, 2005
- 1,664
- 4,347
My top 5 mids would be the first 4 pairs on the right of this pic and then the 08' olympics. Next up would be the 01' neutral grey/met. silver joints.
I agree as well. I had the Chicago and black/gold and wouldn't mind a high cut Chicago with DSM quality pantent leather.03 patent leather collection. All three are amazing
- Jan 10, 2016
- 17,922
- 21,209
Nice. But you haven't seen these yet at any local stores?!
I only expect to see them discounted now when I see them on the shelf.
JPS
formerly instagram
- May 4, 2015
- 30,844
- 36,283
Eli the Best AJI of qbs
The rest of them just rare air pairs w Nike air on da back
The rest of them just rare air pairs w Nike air on da back
- May 12, 2013
- 2,157
- 527
got the jordan 1 heiress in hand today and they are pretty sick , i wish i didnt wear size 13 so they fit me but damn it
- Dec 2, 2011
- 9,407
- 8,127
- Dec 26, 2013
- 2,143
- 1,759
AJ1 noob, what is regarded as better, the 2013 or 2015 Chicagos? Feel free to blast me for asking
JPS
formerly instagram
- May 4, 2015
- 30,844
- 36,283
God level. Makes tom Brady look like Romo
- Dec 2, 2011
- 9,407
- 8,127
Which do you prefer on pics alone?
- Oct 24, 2016
- 236
- 90
- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,629
- 27,195
The complaint with 13 Chi's was that quality was very poor, below all of the other 13 releases. Also the tongue was made with a stiff "leather" so they were very uncomfortable. If you don't care about that stuff go for it.
Last edited:
JPS
formerly instagram
- May 4, 2015
- 30,844
- 36,283
Yea 15>>>13
All the 13 releases were awful. Got rid of all of them
All the 13 releases were awful. Got rid of all of them
- Jun 1, 2006
- 23,629
- 27,195
Royals weren't bad. I've also heard Knicks were good
- Jul 20, 2002
- 5,722
- 2,235
Knicks and shadows had the best leather of the 13 Is by far. The knicks pair was the only pair of 1s I kept as the 1 is too narrow for my fat feet. I wear them 2 or 3 times a year when I go to msg for a game. Knicks 1 and KP jersey is a good look haha.
rbk93
Supporter
- Jun 29, 2016
- 14,194
- 13,480
Probably a bad thing, don't really don't do too much in store shopping.
- Oct 24, 2016
- 236
- 90
lol, Those are all things I do care about. Thanks for the info. I will pass on these and keep an eye open for the 15s.
- Oct 2, 2013
- 1,962
- 2,858
babyjs23
Staff member
- May 3, 2009
- 19,955
- 26,571
- Jul 21, 2012
- 11,959
- 6,203
- Dec 26, 2013
- 2,143
- 1,759
2013 but if the quality isn't great I'll definitely go with 2015s
- Dec 26, 2013
- 2,143
- 1,759
*Googles where the nearest Marshalls is*
- Feb 3, 2012
- 7,240
- 14,944
I'll put it this way: Chicago 1s are my all time favorite 1s. When I went to the store on the morning of the release day in 2013 I decided to get the Knicks 1s instead even though the Knicks were I believe $30 more. Maybe part of it was the NA on the tongue, the high cut, and the non-leather tongue but the materials also played a part. 2013 high OG 1s are shunned now because the leather quality on the 2015 pairs is that much better. And the leather on 2013 high OG 1s was that much better than what was used on the 2013 Chicagos. Do not buy the 2013 Chicagos. One pair of 2015 Chis are worth an infinite amount of pairs of 2013 Chis.
- Jul 2, 2015
- 421
- 181
Man, I don't know. SBB's too? Possible, but feel like we're getting trolled at this point.
BTW, on a larger note, if anyone was curious about those Frags making it to Marshalls, Found this yesterday. I was definitely wondering how it was possible.
http://www.complex.com/sneakers/2017/01/how-sneakers-end-up-at-marshalls
Last edited:
