- May 30, 2018
- 9,327
- 30,187
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
you f&f?

630033-116 not that i can tell
624040-111 not that i can tell
if not, then what? lol
not that it necessarily matters...
lil help...
are you wondering which one this is based on? Why wouldn't it be 630033? the back stitching? 624040 was also used for '01 B pairs. Other one i can think of is 630117 but not sure that came out in all white.
The ice bottom
Think mish mash then. 624040 B pairs and 630117 fit the front/back stitching but no white. My guess would actually be 630117 as those also had the satin linerYes, and yes the stitching.
Also, 630033-116 was already out in the '90's already.
2001 624040-111 was LE. I had a pair. No dubrae - no swoosh on the toe.
Exact match or conflation?
Does the COTM have better quality leather?Comparison: COTM at top, 01 at bottom. Need 2 more pairs of 01 on discount. And a little variety.
![]()
![]()
![]()
Comparison: COTM at top, 01 at bottom. Need 2 more pairs of 01 on discount. And a little variety.
![]()
![]()
![]()
You need some John Elliotts belovedComparison: COTM at top, 01 at bottom. Need 2 more pairs of 01 on discount. And a little variety.
![]()
![]()
![]()
01 have same good quality ad COTM.Does the COTM have better quality leather?