- Jan 4, 2011
- 1,922
- 147
Originally Posted by robxdrew
Originally Posted by BIP Roberts
I feel you, Mr. Voo. Honestly, I was kind of tempted on these. I really disliked leather midsoles in general though. Luckily I got drunk last night and forgot about the release in the morning so I didn't even really have to make a decision. I kind of wanted them - but I also had a feeling I'd have buyer's remorse had I done that. So, save that cash, and it's more money to hunt vintage pairs.Originally Posted by vood99
BIP, if you look at this shoe it doesn't really have much in common with an AF-1. It's overpriced, has a leather midsole, some fancy cloth type materials and those terrible waxed laces. Don't get me wrong, I have a few 'Supremes' in my collection but I got them for 1/4th to 1/5th of their asking price.
I not a fan of the tiers (Basic, Premium, Supreme) as it's Nike's way of getting us to pay for leather/materials that should be standard and I feel that these just don't warrant the $200 price tag either.
I do however agree with you that paying $180+ for garbage JB retros and $200+ for low quality Foam reproductions is insane as well.
The shoe flopped (or didn't do as well as Nike projected it would).
The 200 dollar price tag killed it.
-Drew
Basically.