- Jun 21, 2015
- 13,963
- 17,878
I went half size down from my TTS for the Dame 3s.
I went TTS for the Crazy Explosive Low PKs.
No way I'd be comfortable going full size down for either shoe.
Last edited:
Official Adidas Dame Thread - Dame 4 in stores now.
- Thread in 'Other Brands' Thread starter Started by ramzs8906,
- Start date
I went TTS for the Crazy Explosive Low PKs.
No way I'd be comfortable going full size down for either shoe.
- Feb 18, 2017
- 131
- 145
Same, I went a half size down in my Dame 3 and Harden 1 and TTS in the D Rose 7 and Crazy Explosive (not the lows)
For reference:
Dame 3: Size 9
Harden Vol. 1: Size 9
D Rose 7: Size 9.5
Crazy Explosive (not the low tops): Size 9.5
Bonus reference:
Curry 2: Size 9.5
Curry 3: Size 9
Something about this year's models ran long for me I suppose, or I'm shrinking as I get old
For reference:
Dame 3: Size 9
Harden Vol. 1: Size 9
D Rose 7: Size 9.5
Crazy Explosive (not the low tops): Size 9.5
Bonus reference:
Curry 2: Size 9.5
Curry 3: Size 9
Something about this year's models ran long for me I suppose, or I'm shrinking as I get old
- Aug 7, 2010
- 2,616
- 1,580
I went full size down in Hardens. That toe box is so roomy and I hate lots of dead space in front of my toes. 1/4 size of dead space in front is preferred.
Wesley Pipes
formerly gusgus57
- Apr 19, 2014
- 533
- 232
I read all the awesome reviews on the lillard 2s but my feet were just not comfortable in them. Not trying to bash on the shoe, but its just not for me.
- Feb 9, 2015
- 458
- 111
How did you go size-wise?
Wesley Pipes
formerly gusgus57
- Apr 19, 2014
- 533
- 232
Half a size down
- Feb 9, 2015
- 458
- 111
Just got the CLB 2016 in, went a full size down and fits perfect. I went a full size down in the Lillard 2's as well. Haven't tried the Dame's but it's possible they could have the same sizing issue.
- Jan 19, 2007
- 20,439
- 18,654
Full size down on the Dame 3 and Harden V1. I have narrow feet and I hate dead space. Adidas sizing is so whacky.
- Jun 2, 2015
- 2,439
- 1,490
that just means your feet are one size smaller for adidas?
i find it the other way, since i have somewhat wide feet...up till Rose 6 and crazylight boost 2015, i find them narrow for my size, then in 2016, all their shoes gotten wider, like crazylight boost 2016, harden vol 1, dame 3, and crazy explosives...now at least i can hoop in them in my size.
i find it the other way, since i have somewhat wide feet...up till Rose 6 and crazylight boost 2015, i find them narrow for my size, then in 2016, all their shoes gotten wider, like crazylight boost 2016, harden vol 1, dame 3, and crazy explosives...now at least i can hoop in them in my size.
- Dec 29, 2012
- 2,333
- 220
i like the harden fit at half size down.. Is the dame 3 wide as well? I tried to go down half size in the lillard 2 and they were too tight width wise once I started moving around
Last edited:
- Aug 10, 2012
- 4,088
- 6,249
Whatever you wore in the 2 is what I would suggest in the 3. Width is about the same.
- Dec 14, 2004
- 60,034
- 50,948
DTLR.com has the all black for $70 and the all cream for $80
- Jan 21, 2015
- 2,607
- 2,787
I can, the dame are are a al around more comfortable feel
Weird, do they know the blazers haven't got swept yet? I am happy pacers got swept tho since according to your logic the pg1 should go on sale today
- Jun 2, 2015
- 2,439
- 1,490
the harden is tied for the widest with crazy explosives which i do wear my size along with lillard 2s, and i find 2 just wide enough at my size so you might not want to go 1/2 size down on the lillard 2s nor dame 3s.
- Dec 14, 2004
- 60,034
- 50,948
Hahahahahahahaha
I said when a team gets bounced or after the Finals. Let's not act like it's gonna be the day after either.
- Jun 2, 2015
- 2,439
- 1,490
gatorade should at least take PG off of their commercial cos after they got swept, it's just funny watching him telling us "no overtime".
- Feb 9, 2015
- 458
- 111
On sizing:
- Aug 10, 2012
- 4,088
- 6,249
^^^ HELL NO!!!!! No idea what size they wear in the first place.
Wesley Pipes
formerly gusgus57
- Apr 19, 2014
- 533
- 232
"This traction is bad I had to wipe every play. I'll give it a 9 out of 10" LMAO
That's why I don't trust their videos
That's why I don't trust their videos
Last edited:
- Jun 21, 2015
- 13,963
- 17,878
clowns lol
- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,857
- 62,742
the dude on the right wears a size 7 or something
- Sep 29, 2008
- 11,120
- 3,734
I think a lot people dont know that US sizing is different for Nike and adidas. At least from what i noticed on my ultraboosts and flyknit racers
Adidas 9uk = 9.5US
Nike 9uk = 10US
I'm usually a 10 on nike and 9.5 in adidas. I wear sz 9 on Hardens and Dames
Adidas 9uk = 9.5US
Nike 9uk = 10US
I'm usually a 10 on nike and 9.5 in adidas. I wear sz 9 on Hardens and Dames
- Jun 2, 2015
- 2,439
- 1,490
worst reviews are from these two.
- Feb 9, 2015
- 458
- 111
They actually had a good point about their ratings. They said the tech has advanced to the point where even the "bad" features are only bad subjectively speaking. So even a "bad" cushion or traction today is still "good" objectively speaking.
The hate is real. I actually think kickgenius has the worst reviews. They soldout and clearly have a bias for some brands.
Either way I don't think determining whether your foot fits in a shoe or not is something that has a lot of room for error.
Last edited:
- Dec 13, 2004
- 74,857
- 62,742
nah, no defending that
you can't say you wipe every single chance then give it a 9 out of 10 grade because bad today is good objectively?
nah that's some bs ranking, the whole review is inconsistent and these guys always get the techs wrong or just has no clue, I mean you're doing a review on a shoe, read up on what the shoe consist of first
KG didn't exactly sellout, it's just that one half of the team stopped playing ball and it's the one that knew most of the tech, watch their old reviews and you'll see tre trying to explain the science on the tech
and people get mad at KG for being late on the PG1 review while SB takes a night of playing on an empty gym to test the shoes and looks like they test multiple shoes at a time at that, those dudes are at the gym at like midnight when the courts are empty
but hey if any of us were asked by Eastbay to be on their cover and get paid, who would say no?
this is like getting mad because their underground band became mainstream then starts saying they soldout like they have some sense of entitlement to the whole band and just want to keep them from being successful 
I am not really mad at these reviewers, if they are getting money and followers, all the power to them despite my criticisms but I also just pick and choose who to believe or not
you can't say you wipe every single chance then give it a 9 out of 10 grade because bad today is good objectively?
nah that's some bs ranking, the whole review is inconsistent and these guys always get the techs wrong or just has no clue, I mean you're doing a review on a shoe, read up on what the shoe consist of first
KG didn't exactly sellout, it's just that one half of the team stopped playing ball and it's the one that knew most of the tech, watch their old reviews and you'll see tre trying to explain the science on the tech
and people get mad at KG for being late on the PG1 review while SB takes a night of playing on an empty gym to test the shoes and looks like they test multiple shoes at a time at that, those dudes are at the gym at like midnight when the courts are empty
but hey if any of us were asked by Eastbay to be on their cover and get paid, who would say no?
this is like getting mad because their underground band became mainstream then starts saying they soldout like they have some sense of entitlement to the whole band and just want to keep them from being successful I am not really mad at these reviewers, if they are getting money and followers, all the power to them despite my criticisms but I also just pick and choose who to believe or not
Last edited:
