- Nov 18, 2007
- 28,107
- 9,249
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We had a Greatest Home Run hitter of all time and they never really put a great overall team around him!
I think they have been fair. I wouldn't say they have done everything in their power to put the best players on the field though.Since 2010 have we really thought they've been anything but fair w/ their payroll??
I think they have been fair. I wouldn't say they have done everything in their power to put the best players on the field though.
Take late last offseason for example. We had a glaring hole in left field, and there were still good free agents available. I believe the exact quote from management was that we were "tapped out" and wouldn't be making any more moves in free agency. Well, IMO, that is a load of BS. How after two WS titles in the last 3 years (and all the money that was flooding in due to that), were we tapped out? Thats why we ended up with Andres Torres. To me, that was a perfect example of our ownership being cheap.
But overall, I am with you Lazy. They have been fair. In fact, they have often times been far more than fair when it comes to spending money (Pagan, Scutaro, Huff, Affeldt, etc.)
I dont disagree with any of this. I think you are absolutely spot on with how management is willing to spend their money ( A- rewarding players who were already on our team and B- hesitant to make big(ger) signings in free agency because or Rowand and Zito).All the players that were given bad contracts were already on our team, and they all played like they needed the money in their contract years. Of course the last few years is a small sample size but from what it looks like it seems upper management is only willing to spend money on players that prove themselves while they're with us. They might be hesitant after how badly Rowand and Zito flamed out.
I don't get the fascination with B. Pill