**OFFICIAL 2019 NBA OFFSEASON THREAD**

Which team will win the 2018-2019 NBA Championship?


  • Total voters
    180
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
That's almost 50% of the games with a W and not costing 30m. If you still can't understand, yikes.

:lol: The point of that comment was to point out the extremely low sample size in games played as the main guy compared to Devin Booker.

If you can't understand that....it wouldn't be the first time you couldn't understand something in here :lol:
 
I couldn't possibly care any less about these barbershop buzzwords you *****s keep throwing out. What the **** is "special"...how do you quantify that?

My only argument...is that DEVIN BOOKER IS NOT THE CENTRAL REASON FOR THE PHOENIX SUNS BEING TRASH. Ya'll have yet to provide ANY actuall basketball critique...it's purely narrative driven. "Because he makes 30 million"...is not actual basketball critique.
Here's a critique, Booker had not being able to make his team a 25 win team yet. We are on year 5?

Whether he was making 1 dollar or 30m, if a dude is elite, he could push for a few more victories. So although dude has put up monster numbers what does it really means?

Look at those games .....
 
AGAIN NOBODY is blaming Booker for the Suns woes, we're just saying that for a player who's supposed to be that good... he hasn't had much of an impact on his team winning at all. so people have doubts on just how good he really is & that's valid.

This all comes down to the level you think Booker is currently at, if your looking at him like he's gonna be great in the Future... sure his record over these years make sense, most young players don't have that big of an effect (although i will say by year four guys elite guys atleast improve their team by 5-10 wins)

However if you think Booker is an ELITE or top 30 player in the NBA, then i think it's fare to expect more than the lower 20's in win total by now with a relatively healthy team.
 
Last edited:
I couldn't possibly care any less about these barbershop buzzwords you *****s keep throwing out. What the **** is "special"...how do you quantify that?

My only argument...is that DEVIN BOOKER IS NOT THE CENTRAL REASON FOR THE PHOENIX SUNS BEING TRASH. Ya'll have yet to provide ANY actuall basketball critique...it's purely narrative driven. "Because he makes 30 million"...is not actual basketball critique.
But he also isnt the central reason for them being relatively successful now either. That's where my initial comment of him not being IT came from. Can he improve to be IT, of course but right now HE AINT IT. I see him as Cleveland Kyrie, he getting buckets and such but that's about it
 
I couldn't possibly care any less about these barbershop buzzwords you *****s keep throwing out. What the **** is "special"...how do you quantify that?

My only argument...is that DEVIN BOOKER IS NOT THE CENTRAL REASON FOR THE PHOENIX SUNS BEING TRASH. Ya'll have yet to provide ANY actuall basketball critique...it's purely narrative driven. "Because he makes 30 million"...is not actual basketball critique.
I'm not the one that initially threw out the word special. Someone else did. To me, special basketball players aren't losing this many games every year regardless of who's on the court.

Can I quantify it? Maybe not. But you can probably tell it when you see it.

I'd agree he's not the central reason they suck. But I don't think he's a guy that's going to raise the level of anyone around him and put a franchise on his back or ever be the best player on a really good basketball team. The empty stats thing was kinda a joke initially, but I don't think he does anything exceptionally well aside from score the basketball.
 
Kings should've just drafted Luka and they'd probably be in the playoffs.
 
:lol: The point of that comment was to point out the extremely low sample size in games played as the main guy compared to Devin Booker.

If you can't understand that....it wouldn't be the first time you couldn't understand something in here :lol:
Extremly low sample size and he won more games than Booker. What kind of dumb argument are you proposing, look at the Knicks with out him. Almost the same record as the Booker lead team. Yet 10 games worst ... so he actually had an impact on the wins. Show me Booker, please!!!

You need to rethink your argument...

SMH ... you really thought you killed it too.
 
The whole Suns franchise is in shambles.

Booker signed his extension so naturally you can put some blame on him but dude has been through multiple coaches and tons of teammates. Plus he what the market said he was worth, so his salary is a moot point imo.

Asking Booker to carry the load is one thing, asking him to overcome the shear amount of incompetence thrown at him by his franchise is another.
 
There were plenty of great pure scorers/shooters (Ray, Redd, Reggie, list goes on) who led their teams to much more than Devin Booker.

He can put the ball in the hole, no question. But the praise he gets after his pointless 60 point games in losses is laughable at this point. Same **** just a different year.
 
The whole Suns franchise is in shambles.

Booker signed his extension so naturally you can put some blame on him but dude has been through multiple coaches and tons of teammates. Plus he what the market said he was worth, so his salary is a moot point imo.

Asking Booker to carry the load is one thing, asking him to overcome the shear amount of incompetence thrown at him by his franchise is another.

I don't this asking a minimum for at least minimal progress is unfair, there's no reason for them to be getting worse while he's getting better individually with more high end talent around him.
 
Boogie is another example of a guy who was getting some of that same energy of him being overated/Numbers first guy when he was in Sac.

still is. does he really effect w/l to gs? even when he was out, NO played well without him
i am a warriors fan, he's a liability on defense. his offense isn't really needed. it's nice to have, but W's would still be where they are at without him
 
Devin Booker’s salary will put him in the same range as Beal, Wiggins, Jrue, Mccolum, Otto Porter...I think he fits right in

In reality, only 2 players on that list deserve that salary. Jrue and Beal.

Everyone else was a FA at the right time for a desperate team.
 
still is. does he really effect w/l to gs? even when he was out NO played well without him
i am a warriors fan, he's a liability on defense. his offense isn't really needed. nice to have, but W's would still be where they are at without him

The Warriors are the Warriors & he's coming off that Injury.
 
No people dont know the meaning of spacial. LoL

I love how they play dumb at their convenience.
 
In reality, only 2 players on that list deserve that salary. Jrue and Beal.

Everyone else was a FA at the right time for a desperate team.

Those two guys each have 44 losses. Why would you pay them that much if they can’t even have a winning record?
 
Has anyone else noticed that keko jones comes in here every single day calling people's posts stupid... and a few weeks ago when I called one of his posts stupid he threatened to hop in his car and drive hundreds of miles? :lol
 
Those two guys each have 44 losses. Why would you pay them that much if they can’t even have a winning record?

In the NBA, you get paid based on what you've done. At least the smart teams operate that way.

Those guys are veterans at this point.
 
Has anyone else noticed that keko jones comes in here every single day calling people's posts stupid... and a few weeks ago when I called one of his posts stupid he threatened to hop in his car and drive hundreds of miles? :lol:

Honestly...I don't really take anything he says in this thread serious and only know him as the guy who makes weird obsessive Lebron posts. I typically skip anything he posts but I had time today :lol:
 
Honestly...I don't really take anything he says in this thread serious and only know him as the guy who makes weird obsessive Lebron posts. I typically skip anything he posts but I had time today :lol:
Had time today for????
LoL

You acting like im the only one not agreeing with you.

Then you made an argument about small sample size which had KP winning as many games as Booker on the suns best season as to diminish the accomplishment. LoL

Come on ... I guess I should be politically correct and just call your argument flawed.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom