**OFFICIAL 2019 NBA OFFSEASON THREAD**

Which team will win the 2018-2019 NBA Championship?


  • Total voters
    180
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
KP won more than 25 games every year he was a Knick. Trash *** rosters too.

Bookers teams keep regressing. Stop making excuses for him.

He played a whopping 48 games in a Knicks uni as the undisputed team leader, and they won 23 of them :lol:

You wanna act like 25 games is a benchmark for being some sort of franchise player or some ****...go right ahead :lol:
 
VARNELL HILL VARNELL HILL

Crazy thing is he won 23 win games as the leader. Probably would've finished that season at 35 wins max?

Booker cant win more than 35 games in 2 seasons combined :lol:

We're comparing 2 **** franchises here. One player is clearly better than the other though.
 
I hate that New York traded KP...because it would have been REALLY interesting to see if you kept that same energy.
KP Had a team with 22 wins at the All-Star break in Year 3 before he blew his ACL and his second best player was ****in Tim Hardaway Jr.

Try again.
 
We arent arguing about the fact dudes talent or scoring abilities. All we saying, if people are slandering him, it is justifiable.
 
KP Had a team with 22 wins at the All-Star break before he blew his ACL and his second best player was ****in Tim Hardaway Jr.

Try again.

Try what again? You ain't telling me ****.

You're literally hanging your hat on the number 22 being more than 17 :lol: Even the Knicks fan just admitted...they were two **** franchises. You really wanna die on a hill of one being less trash than the other and that somehow placing one guy above the other?

Like I said...I wish they would have kept him...to watch how that energy would changed when the Unicorn who got gassed by February every year wasn't "winning on his own".
 
Sorry I cant justify 4 consecutive regressing seasons of less than 25 wins. Idc what conference you're in. He's getting too much credit for empty boxscore stats.

Why are KPs stats less empty if he’s playing on a 31 win team in an inferior conference?

Again, I’m just wanting a definition of what empty stats are.
 
KAT is another example. Dude has had terrible rosters sans Jimmy in the West and at the very least has been able to improve or maintain every season (29 wins rookie year, 31 sophomore, 31 this season).
 
KP won more than 25 games every year he was a Knick. Trash *** rosters too.

Bookers teams keep regressing. Stop making excuses for him.
Dude doesnt get that 30m and not even topping 25 wins and just 17 this far this year is grounds for slandering.

You dont pay that kind of money to someone that cant improve your team somewhat.

BTW, KP when a propose trade was presented was better than Booker. Probably still is.
 
Combine KAT and Booker and that team still wont win more than a KP led team.

Dallas is gonna be nice af :smh::smh:
 
He played a whopping 48 games in a Knicks uni as the undisputed team leader, and they won 23 of them :lol:

You wanna act like 25 games is a benchmark for being some sort of franchise player or some ****...go right ahead :lol:
That's almost 50% of the games with a W and not costing 30m. If you still can't understand, yikes.
 
25 games is an awfully low barometer and Devin Booker still can't clear it. :lol:

Again - run down the list of really special players that have this many terribly unsuccessful seasons on the resume.

I couldn't possibly care any less about these barbershop buzzwords you ****** keep throwing out. What the **** is "special"...how do you quantify that?

My only argument...is that DEVIN BOOKER IS NOT THE CENTRAL REASON FOR THE PHOENIX SUNS BEING TRASH. Ya'll have yet to provide ANY actuall basketball critique...it's purely narrative driven. "Because he makes 30 million"...is not actual basketball critique.
 
Boogie is another example of a guy who was getting some of that same energy of him being overated/Numbers first guy when he was in Sac.
 
Again, I’m just wanting a definition of what empty stats are.

No straight definition I dont care about stats in todays NBA. Everyone gets buckets, numbers are crazy inflated with new style/rules.

I'll give any player 3-5 seasons to prove themselves as #1 or #2 option on at least a regular playoff team. How many more excuses will you keep giving players like KAT and Booker? These are MAX guys. I'll give KAT way more credit, but Booker? Na man. Not with no 17-25 game win seasons every year.

In the end of the day, the type of credit he's getting, you'd think he's leading his team somewhere.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom