- Jun 1, 2008
- 38,406
- 7,519
Anybody think the Warriors going to flirt with 70 wins again this year?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Anybody think the Warriors going to flirt with 70 wins again this year?
feels good
interested to see how this stretch of games goes, considering our strength of schedule is almost dead last in league to start the season..lot of tough games coming up
Anybody think the Warriors going to flirt with 70 wins again this year?
Henson left hook on the block...moneyNot even tripping now that Kidd figured out Henson is the best center on the team.
Giannis and Bari continue to get better, not only that but they both show up for the biggest games and seem to love the stage.
I vividly remember you saying how the Knicks aren't going to be laughed at anymore after you guys signed Noah and traded for Rose. Maybe JD or somebody can find it, but we had a brief discussion about it before the season started. I'm just too lazy to find it
Why are you trying to show me the Grizz roster and say they're bad based on your analysis? Nothing I've said over the last few weeks have been screaming we are about to win a championship. As soon as I mention us having the defense and physicality to beat a team like the Warriors, you go up in flames about how the team "supposedly" sucks when you've watched maybe 1 game of them (against your team) this season....
It's just annoying to ALWAYS hear you mention the Grizzles. Especially when saying they have a shot at beating the Warriors. It's just downright hilarious. Bless your fandom though. Sports need more naive fans like you.
Henson left hook on the block...money
Hol up, Timeout
I know bhz loves his gizzels but he really said they have a shot at GSW??
My stance doesn't chance -- you will need an elite defense to beat the Warriors in a playoff series and at least 2 guys capable of playing at a high level.
Cavs showed that
OKC showed it
Grizz showed it to an extent, but they were hurt
All of these teams were elite defensively when they played the Warriors in the playoffs. Two of Three came up short -- one team had their 2nd best player hurt and other blew a 3-1 lead surprisingly.
IF Utah gets the shot, they'll probably end up giving GSW a lot of trouble as well, along with the Clippers. Just not sure if I put "physical" and Clippers in the same category.
maybe if you take off your stock market goggles and watch them enough, you'll form an opinion outside of the norm casual fan laugh.gif going off your opinion of the team, we would be in the bottom 3rd of the west right now.
i'm not saying the grizz are going to knock off the warriors in the playoffs. i'm sure most will say no one in the west will knock them out in a series. that's common knowledge for someone who watches basketball enough.
i do think they have a better shot than over half of the other playoff teams, though. they are one of the teams along with clippers, spurs and utah with elite defenses and physical enough squads to do so.
Hol up, Timeout
I know bhz loves his gizzels but he really said they have a shot at GSW??
No.
This is how it all started -
My stance doesn't chance -- you will need an elite defense to beat the Warriors in a playoff series and at least 2 guys capable of playing at a high level.
Cavs showed that
OKC showed it
Grizz showed it to an extent, but they were hurt
All of these teams were elite defensively when they played the Warriors in the playoffs. Two of Three came up short -- one team had their 2nd best player hurt and other blew a 3-1 lead surprisingly.
IF Utah gets the shot, they'll probably end up giving GSW a lot of trouble as well, along with the Clippers. Just not sure if I put "physical" and Clippers in the same category.
then good ol' scorpio came through saying all i talk about is the grizz
maybe if you take off your stock market goggles and watch them enough, you'll form an opinion outside of the norm casual fan laugh.gif going off your opinion of the team, we would be in the bottom 3rd of the west right now.
i'm not saying the grizz are going to knock off the warriors in the playoffs. i'm sure most will say no one in the west will knock them out in a series. that's common knowledge for someone who watches basketball enough.
i do think they have a better shot than over half of the other playoff teams, though. they are one of the teams along with clippers, spurs and utah with elite defenses and physical enough squads to do so.
yeah but he wasnt nearly the player, kidd didn't unleash him put the ball in his hands til late last season
Ya'll do know Greek Freak has been in the playoffs before with the Bucks as a 6 seed right?
shouldve swung on charles insteadI know I'm probably late as hell but who is this lil kid that slid shaq in his jaw? Lmaoooo
Right.
After the championship...you still have to face the reality that you live in Ohio and your parents are probably cousins.
I'll help you out even though I don't really want to be in the middle of this feud.I vividly remember you saying how the Knicks aren't going to be laughed at anymore after you guys signed Noah and traded for Rose. Maybe JD or somebody can find it, but we had a brief discussion about it before the season started. I'm just too lazy to find it
Originally Posted by bhzmafia14
I can't wait to see the Knicks use that $40M on non all-star players, yet alone a superstar
Non-All Star Noah signed for 4 years/$72 mil a few days later. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯Originally Posted by Hank Scorpio
When have the Knicks recently signed a BAD contract under Phil Jackson? Questionable trades have been done, but there hasn't been one bad signing.
This rhetoric of the Knicks signing non-all stars for big money is over done and frankly played out. You need to find a new bag of jokes, because 2011 called and they're asking for their jokes back
I'll help you out even though I don't really want to be in the middle of this feud.
Non-All Star Noah signed for 4 years/$72 mil a few days later. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯