- 780
- 10
- Joined
- May 7, 2009
Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by finnns2003
I'm disappointed that we aren't matching Howard's cheap shots.
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess KG has retired
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Originally Posted by got shoes
Originally Posted by finnns2003
I'm disappointed that we aren't matching Howard's cheap shots.
WHAT!!!!!!!!!!!! I guess KG has retired
Originally Posted by hellomarco
Monstars stole Davis' skills
Okay buddy, looking at a replay at any moment during the game is definitely a technical...Originally Posted by Durden7
You obviously also fail to see the difference between a reactionary moment and a thought out moment.Originally Posted by petozham
Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Vince Carter got a T in this series for the exact same thing except he was actually off the floor by the score table with his back to the refs when they T'ed him up.
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his....He was by the scorers table looking at the replay not even saying a word under his breath like Perkins was and he got a T....
Both those technical fouls were BS, AND Howard's assigned flagrant on Boston's punkass acting was also BS....
FYI Celtics fans, while you guys are screaming blasphemy and moaning, Boston has 9 more freethrow's.
I didnt say it was a premeditated technical and I never claimed it was a court of law SON. Theres a very big difference between reacting and have time to cool off, then react.Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
Homer?Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Vince Carter got a T in this series for the exact same thing except he was actually off the floor by the score table with his back to the refs when they T'ed him up.
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his.
Can you explain why? He did the EXACT same thing, except he wasn't even on the court.. Break it down for me, though... It's not like your opinion is bias, Celtics homer...
Its not the exact same thing when one player is reacting on the court and the other decides to go over to the scorers table to watch a replay THEN freak out on the bench. Perkins reacted. Vince had time to cool down, decided to take a second look and freaked out after that.
One is reactionary, the other is thought out.
What the hell are you talking about? He thought it out? No such thing as a premeditated Technical. This aint the court of law, it's basketball son... You can swing it anyway you want, but Vince's actions were almost exactly the same except he wasn't even on the court. I'm done though. No sense in arguing with a Celtics fan, I guess.
Big Baby wobblin like Glass Joe from Mike Tyson's Punchout.
Okay buddy, looking at a replay at any moment during the game is definitely a technical...Originally Posted by Durden7
You obviously also fail to see the difference between a reactionary moment and a thought out moment.Originally Posted by petozham
Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Vince Carter got a T in this series for the exact same thing except he was actually off the floor by the score table with his back to the refs when they T'ed him up.
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his....He was by the scorers table looking at the replay not even saying a word under his breath like Perkins was and he got a T....
Both those technical fouls were BS, AND Howard's assigned flagrant on Boston's punkass acting was also BS....
FYI Celtics fans, while you guys are screaming blasphemy and moaning, Boston has 9 more freethrow's.
Are you kidding me? THE GAME IS ALREADY OVER!Originally Posted by Big J 33
If the game was fixed, why not give Pierce a flagrant for that BLATANT push, it was right in front of Crawford?
Then the next play Rashard gets a foul called away from the ball.
Props on the avyOriginally Posted by LIVE BOY D
if i was a celtic fan i would be very worried about the rest of this series....
Originally Posted by finnns2003
Are you kidding me? THE GAME IS ALREADY OVER!Originally Posted by Big J 33
If the game was fixed, why not give Pierce a flagrant for that BLATANT push, it was right in front of Crawford?
Then the next play Rashard gets a foul called away from the ball.
Perkins is not only out for this game, he's done for game 6. This has been a disgusting display of officiating and they deserve every accusation of corruption.
I didnt say it was a premeditated technical and I never claimed it was a court of law SON. Theres a very big difference between reacting and have time to cool off, then react.Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
Homer?Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Vince Carter got a T in this series for the exact same thing except he was actually off the floor by the score table with his back to the refs when they T'ed him up.
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his.
Can you explain why? He did the EXACT same thing, except he wasn't even on the court.. Break it down for me, though... It's not like your opinion is bias, Celtics homer...
Its not the exact same thing when one player is reacting on the court and the other decides to go over to the scorers table to watch a replay THEN freak out on the bench. Perkins reacted. Vince had time to cool down, decided to take a second look and freaked out after that.
One is reactionary, the other is thought out.
What the hell are you talking about? He thought it out? No such thing as a premeditated Technical. This aint the court of law, it's basketball son... You can swing it anyway you want, but Vince's actions were almost exactly the same except he wasn't even on the court. I'm done though. No sense in arguing with a Celtics fan, I guess.
Big Baby wobblin like Glass Joe from Mike Tyson's Punchout.
Okay buddy, looking at a replay at any moment during the game is definitely a technical...Originally Posted by Durden7
You obviously also fail to see the difference between a reactionary moment and a thought out moment.Originally Posted by petozham
Originally Posted by Durden7
Originally Posted by ryaneff23
Vince Carter got a T in this series for the exact same thing except he was actually off the floor by the score table with his back to the refs when they T'ed him up.
That wasnt the same thing.
These two situations are VERY different.
Carter deserved his....He was by the scorers table looking at the replay not even saying a word under his breath like Perkins was and he got a T....
Both those technical fouls were BS, AND Howard's assigned flagrant on Boston's punkass acting was also BS....
FYI Celtics fans, while you guys are screaming blasphemy and moaning, Boston has 9 more freethrow's.
Told u finnns, 1 game at a time. Now ya'll might be without both perkins and davis for game 6. Not a good lookOriginally Posted by finnns2003
Are you kidding me? THE GAME IS ALREADY OVER!Originally Posted by Big J 33
If the game was fixed, why not give Pierce a flagrant for that BLATANT push, it was right in front of Crawford?
Then the next play Rashard gets a foul called away from the ball.
Perkins is not only out for this game, he's done for game 6. This has been a disgusting display of officiating and they deserve every accusation of corruption.