- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,954
- 30,401
^Appreciate it.
I'm waffling with them....Essentially over-thinking things. The early bowl games had the under hitting at a phenomenal rate and just when I tried to get on that bandwagon the overs started flooding in. The books swirling my brain.
I'm trying to strip away all this "the books adjusting and I'm seeing this" crap and go back to actually capping the teams. With Clemson/OSU it's so hard to get to envision because I can see both teams having sustained drives that melt the clock, but also see quick scores. Clemson should open it up and OSU can keep pace if they want to. Plus, always the chance for OT, but playing the over means teams would have to score 10 TD's with a FG. That's a lot.
I'm waffling with them....Essentially over-thinking things. The early bowl games had the under hitting at a phenomenal rate and just when I tried to get on that bandwagon the overs started flooding in. The books swirling my brain.
I'm trying to strip away all this "the books adjusting and I'm seeing this" crap and go back to actually capping the teams. With Clemson/OSU it's so hard to get to envision because I can see both teams having sustained drives that melt the clock, but also see quick scores. Clemson should open it up and OSU can keep pace if they want to. Plus, always the chance for OT, but playing the over means teams would have to score 10 TD's with a FG. That's a lot.
Last edited: