- 746
- 609
it looks nicer, in MY opinion. It had a certain richness to it in look and feel and it is more malleable meaning the creases weren't as harsh. But you do you. Go on with your peach fuzzbuck...
Nike Air Jordan Retro Metallic V - 7/23/16
- Thread in 'Jordan Brand' Thread starter Started by ozuna23,
- Start date
- 7,138
- 6,238
I also agree with you. The OG was plush to the touch. It reminds of how bed sheets have a thread count. The OG was a high 800 thread count while this new age stuff is a 100 thread count.... Although some releases are nice to the touch... they are not even close to the OG.
- 1,804
- 500
- 11,459
- 15,619
its because the metallics came out 2 years before. Idk why anyone actually thought they would drop twice in 2 yearsYeah, the Oreo 5's are just ok at best. I appreciate the fact that Nike made so many of them and at least they had a different material than others like the Fire Reds and Grapes (Like good Lord the 2013 Jordan 5's were a bad time all around) , but that does nothing to save them as far as colorways go. Not saying that they're the worst Jordan 5 i've ever seen, but they're nothing to write home about either. I remember that numerous people were angry that we got the Oreo V's for Black Friday instead of the Black Metallics and I think it's perfectly understandable why, because the former simply isn't as nice as the latter.
Chill with the false info
The white and black 9s came out in 2008 and 2010. At the end of the day business is business
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
thats not false info buddy. And the CDP were double pack releases so of course they would come out again with the next wave of 9s as a stand alone general release. Nice try though. Besides the Chicagos or even Bred 1s, JB has yet to do a single(1 pair of shoes) general release in two years time.Chill with the false info
The white and black 9s came out in 2008 and 2010. At the end of the day business is business
Last edited:
- 11,459
- 15,619
Okay Gentry.
2008 Black and Red 1 "Strap"
2009 Black and Red 1 "DMP"
2011 Black and Red 1 "Banned"
2013 Black and Red 1 "OG"
2016 Black and Red 1 "Remastered"
2008 Black and Red 1 "Strap"
2009 Black and Red 1 "DMP"
2011 Black and Red 1 "Banned"
2013 Black and Red 1 "OG"
2016 Black and Red 1 "Remastered"
- 6,050
- 15,100
Okay Gentry.
2008 Black and Red 1 "Strap"
2009 Black and Red 1 "DMP"
2011 Black and Red 1 "Banned"
2013 Black and Red 1 "OG"
2016 Black and Red 1 "Remastered"
Dam g, thats a lot of bred 1.
Last edited:
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
which is why i threw The breds in my comment. You're comment is redundantOkay Gentry.
2008 Black and Red 1 "Strap"
2009 Black and Red 1 "DMP"
2011 Black and Red 1 "Banned"
2013 Black and Red 1 "OG"
2016 Black and Red 1 "Remastered"
- 2,715
- 9,057
Damn, lookin' at that list... Makes me realize that if anyone misses out this September, you might as well wait until the next release. Repped @617collector, for not using the term "Bred".Okay Gentry.
2008 Black and Red 1 "Strap"
2009 Black and Red 1 "DMP"
2011 Black and Red 1 "Banned"
2013 Black and Red 1 "OG"
2016 Black and Red 1 "Remastered"
- 11,459
- 15,619
which is why i threw The breds in my comment. You're comment is redundantOkay Gentry.
2008 Black and Red 1 "Strap"
2009 Black and Red 1 "DMP"
2011 Black and Red 1 "Banned"
2013 Black and Red 1 "OG"
2016 Black and Red 1 "Remastered"
2011 White and Cement 3 "Retro"
2013 White and Cement 3 "Nike Air"
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
gr and special edition limited release. Damn bro, you're really trying hard
As i said, JB has not made it a habit to do a general release for the same shoe in a 2 year window. This doesn't count packs our limited/outlet/special occasion shoes, which is why it wouldn't have made sense for Jb to release the metallics in 2013, unless it had any of the attributes i just mentioned.
I'm done wasting thread space over a comment you clearly don't get.
Last edited:
- 11,459
- 15,619
gr and special edition limited release. Damn bro, you're really trying hard
As i said, JB has not made it a habit to do a general release for the same shoe in a 2 year window. This doesn't count packs our limited/outlet/special occasion shoes, which is why it wouldn't have made sense for Jb to release the metallics in 2013, unless it had any of the attributes i just mentioned.
I'm done wasting thread space over a comment you clearly don't get.
Go take a nap AirSak
- 2,715
- 9,057
Hopefully the 3M is at least like this...
As for the Durabuck, I wish we could get that smooth OG Durabuck. But, if we get the material used on the Black Supreme 5's, I'll be satisfied.
As for the Durabuck, I wish we could get that smooth OG Durabuck. But, if we get the material used on the Black Supreme 5's, I'll be satisfied.
- 2,715
- 9,057
CLAWD!!!
God that ashy-ness is atrocious!!!
Man I'm glad I struck out on these 3 years ago... They look like ashy grapes at the grocery store, in the produce section.
JB is straight up wrong with for that ish, for real. Durabuck on them would've made them perfect.
Repped @AirSakuragi, I didn't know they were that damn ashy...
Jesus!!!
Last edited:
- 2,227
- 2,157
I hope the Durabuck is decent quality, but the ashiness problem never bothered me as much as various model's shape problems.
I am pretty interested to see if JB will include the leather heel among the remaster features of certain V's and VI's
I am pretty interested to see if JB will include the leather heel among the remaster features of certain V's and VI's
- 2,715
- 9,057
^This.
There's no reason to call them "OG" anything, if they don't at least make that change. They didn't fix the superior butchering of my favorite model, the IV's. So I don't think we should hold our breath @Zephyr1983.
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
I agree
M
marztharealist
. These early pairs are making me nervous.
I'm holding out hope for the infrareds remaster. They at least tried back in 2000 and in 2006(dmp) to get the og look.
I'm holding out hope for the infrareds remaster. They at least tried back in 2000 and in 2006(dmp) to get the og look.
Last edited:
Aquamanjay_
formerly jaylaw15
- 8,180
- 9,262
View media item 2026983
2000 pair
2000 pair
- 1,804
- 500
I need these in my life..
- 23,509
- 38,076
Christ these are dope. 2 pairs if I can swing em.
- 486
- 85
What's wrong with the new IV's?
- 2,715
- 9,057
I agree also @jaylaw15, the 1999/2000 Retro was a thing of beauty. I'd be satisfied if we got an exact replica of that version. Hopefully they fix the tongue also, & make it bigger, with more padding... It was thin, & god awful on the 2013 retro.
x-alt
Banned
- 1,216
- 236
2000 was thinner padding than most retros actually. Still dunks on the OGs and 2006 by a longshot.
Last edited:
- 13,529
- 9,454
Yeah, tongues on the 00's were thinner than the 06+ for sure. Part of that may be because the tongues on the 00 were more pliable. 00s used a flexible reflective coated textile, whereas the 06 and up models use a much stiffer reflective reflective material that acts almost like a shell.
As for the upper material... If they look anything like the CC Sports pictures posted above, I'll be satisfied.
As for the upper material... If they look anything like the CC Sports pictures posted above, I'll be satisfied.
- 1,320
- 1,663
Passing on Everything except maybe White/Red Low XI's to get at least 3 pairs, maybe 4. My Top 5 Jordan's are 4>3>5>13>11 Don't really care for anything else
