Nike Air Jordan 1 "Chicago" - May 30, 2015. (LEGIT CHECK IN 1st POST)

How many pairs will you be copping?

  • "1" is all I need.

    Votes: 3 17.6%
  • 2. One to rock, One to stock.

    Votes: 8 47.1%
  • 3+. I need to hoard for no valid reason.

    Votes: 5 29.4%
  • 0. No OG Box? PASS.

    Votes: 1 5.9%

  • Total voters
    17
That's not bad... would def do it. Still can't find an authentic ds 11 ...no social media. Any assists would be greatly appreciated please PM me.
 
I'm waiting for someone to post an on-foot pic with medium-high socks lol
 
The leather on the chicagos and shattered backboards makes the last couple royal releases look like doo doo. They need the remastered treatment.
I wouldn't go that far.  Royal leather is just fine.  Natural creases and not stiff at all.  It's like all of a sudden, the 2013 run of 1's is DMP leather or something to y'all.
 
The leather on the chicagos and shattered backboards makes the last couple royal releases look like doo doo. They need the remastered treatment.
I wouldn't go that far.  Royal leather is just fine.  Natural creases and not stiff at all.  It's like all of a sudden, the 2013 run of 1's is DMP leather or something to y'all.
You get better leather in honda accords than these sneakers. I don't know why people are so impressed :lol
 
You get better leather in honda accords than these sneakers. I don't know why people are so impressed :lol

You also pay over $1000 for a set of 4 car seats, so how is that relevant to anything?
The quality is relevant when people are saying "this is good leather" and "this is bad leather" when they're both subpar. The price you're bringing up isn't.
 
The quality is relevant when people are saying "this is good leather" and "this is bad leather" when they're both subpar. The price you're bringing up isn't.

How? Quality is relative, and relative to other similiar shoes at similiar price points released in the past this is better leather, that is quantifiable. It has been discussed by others.

You bringing up the seats of a car that cost significantly more than these shoes and no one has compared the leather to is the only irrelevant thing here. It has only been discussed by you...

That is literally the definition of irrelevance.
 
Last edited:
How? Quality is relative, and relative to other similiar shoes at similiar price points released in the past this is better leather, that is quantifiable. It has been discussed by others.

You bringing up the seats of a car that cost significantly more than these shoes and no one has compared the leather to is the only irrelevant thing here. It has only been discussed by you...

That is literally the definition of irrelevance.

Its that NT logic. "I'm gonna compare shoes to a car......."

:rollin
 
The leather on the 2013 Jordan 1's just looks really stiff in comparison to these, almost plasticy. I'd just really like to see a pair of royals that are similar to banneds or chicagos. It is definitely funny with every release people are saying it's so much better than the last. Not sure if it's just resellers building hype, but I've read a few people already talking about how the shattered backboards are so much better than the chicagos hahaha. Like those are old news now haha.
 
Last edited:
Someone please throw me an oop...have some sympathy. I'm down 225 after being screwed by a co-worker...I should of known better but now I need an authentic pair. Can't settle. I have a sz 11 in sights for 420 I'll go check out later. Like I said I'm already down 225....a pair in the 3's would be greatly appreciated. Who ever wants em for comparisons they can be yours for a lead to a reasonable authentic pair sz 11 or 11.5 please PM me
 
but aint you the same dude who can't tell the difference between the mold of an OG 7 compared to the current day 7's? :lol

That is I. I don't observe shoes that closely, to be honest. I put the shoes on and that's about it. Not sure how this is related to me saying comparing leather in a car to shoes though. That's like comparing a home to a napkin.
 
The quality is relevant when people are saying "this is good leather" and "this is bad leather" when they're both subpar. The price you're bringing up isn't.

How? Quality is relative, and relative to other similiar shoes at similiar price points released in the past this is better leather, that is quantifiable. It has been discussed by others.

You bringing up the seats of a car that cost significantly more than these shoes and no one has compared the leather to is the only irrelevant thing here. It has only been discussed by you...

That is literally the definition of irrelevance.
"Quality is relative.......this is better leather, that is quantifiable." :|

I bring up the car seats because honda accord leather isn't the best, and leather on the 1s isn't even as good as it, so comparison of quality between colorways isn't really important when they have minimal difference and still not good. As long as its not the plastic/shiny leather that JB used to crank out years ago, just be grateful.
 
Back
Top Bottom