ogretro4me
Banned
- Jun 22, 2014
- 966
- 213
View media item 1598146
I thought it was a cool deal
I thought it was a cool deal
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
One of the nicest on foot pics I've seen
yeah, i ll post later when i m homeCan you take a pic?
I wouldn't go that far. Royal leather is just fine. Natural creases and not stiff at all. It's like all of a sudden, the 2013 run of 1's is DMP leather or something to y'all.The leather on the chicagos and shattered backboards makes the last couple royal releases look like doo doo. They need the remastered treatment.
You get better leather in honda accords than these sneakers. I don't know why people are so impressedI wouldn't go that far. Royal leather is just fine. Natural creases and not stiff at all. It's like all of a sudden, the 2013 run of 1's is DMP leather or something to y'all.The leather on the chicagos and shattered backboards makes the last couple royal releases look like doo doo. They need the remastered treatment.
You get better leather in honda accords than these sneakers. I don't know why people are so impressed
The quality is relevant when people are saying "this is good leather" and "this is bad leather" when they're both subpar. The price you're bringing up isn't.You get better leather in honda accords than these sneakers. I don't know why people are so impressed
You also pay over $1000 for a set of 4 car seats, so how is that relevant to anything?
I wouldn't go that far. Royal leather is just fine. Natural creases and not stiff at all. It's like all of a sudden, the 2013 run of 1's is DMP leather or something to y'all.
The quality is relevant when people are saying "this is good leather" and "this is bad leather" when they're both subpar. The price you're bringing up isn't.
How? Quality is relative, and relative to other similiar shoes at similiar price points released in the past this is better leather, that is quantifiable. It has been discussed by others.
You bringing up the seats of a car that cost significantly more than these shoes and no one has compared the leather to is the only irrelevant thing here. It has only been discussed by you...
That is literally the definition of irrelevance.
Its that NT logic. "I'm gonna compare shoes to a car......."
but aint you the same dude who can't tell the difference between the mold of an OG 7 compared to the current day 7's?
"Quality is relative.......this is better leather, that is quantifiable."The quality is relevant when people are saying "this is good leather" and "this is bad leather" when they're both subpar. The price you're bringing up isn't.
How? Quality is relative, and relative to other similiar shoes at similiar price points released in the past this is better leather, that is quantifiable. It has been discussed by others.
You bringing up the seats of a car that cost significantly more than these shoes and no one has compared the leather to is the only irrelevant thing here. It has only been discussed by you...
That is literally the definition of irrelevance.