- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,287
- 19,666
*googles Robert Herron to see if he was drafted by Tampa Bay*
*is not surprised at the results*
*is not surprised at the results*
NFL Discussion Thread: Pats win SB XLIX. Offseason begins
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by 651akathepaul,
- Start date
- Status
- Oct 13, 2000
- 22,885
- 2,317
- Mar 2, 2011
- 30,498
- 5,958
Buc that.
- Dec 27, 2012
- 73,567
- 100,579
So Sherman wants the entire Legion of Boon on Madden...RIP Seahawks if that happens
- Jun 1, 2011
- 107,070
- 79,479
- Mar 2, 2011
- 30,498
- 5,958
Buc Em Ye
Buc Em Ye
I wouldn't kiss on that with Grand Marnier
Buc Em Ye
I wouldn't kiss on that with Grand Marnier
- Nov 17, 2004
- 37,287
- 19,666
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,412
- 195,828
The Browns turned down Hard Knocks.
That would have been TV Gold right there
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
So glad the Browns turned down the Hard Knocks tv show.
Ridiculous that we get spit on by ESPN and specifically by Max Kellerman and Marcellus Wiley, they both argued, "that franchise has been irrelevant for so long, by minimize the effectivness of Johnny Football"?
How in the hell would this Hard Knocks show make the Browns relevant again??? What if they lose every game? And how are we minimizing the effectivness of Manziel? By not showing his face on tv every week?
c'mon espn. Smarten up. This is probably the best move the Browns made this off-season. We don't want a damn TV show.
We want wins. Wins. Wins.
Ridiculous that we get spit on by ESPN and specifically by Max Kellerman and Marcellus Wiley, they both argued, "that franchise has been irrelevant for so long, by minimize the effectivness of Johnny Football"?
How in the hell would this Hard Knocks show make the Browns relevant again??? What if they lose every game? And how are we minimizing the effectivness of Manziel? By not showing his face on tv every week?
c'mon espn. Smarten up. This is probably the best move the Browns made this off-season. We don't want a damn TV show. We want wins. Wins. Wins.
Last edited:
MON5T3R
formerly cant nobody stop me
- Oct 24, 2007
- 5,796
- 912
I thought they werent going to ask teams with first year head coaches
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
That's just an exception to be able to say 'No' to the offer. If the Browns would've had still had Chud as thier coach let's say; than the NFL could have forced them into the show.
Becuase they have rookie coach, they had the option of saying no. And they did. Rightfully so.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,412
- 195,828
Three teams left that they can force to be on unless another team volunteers
Pitt, Chicago & Giants
Pitt, Chicago & Giants
- Oct 13, 2000
- 22,885
- 2,317
I'm guessing it ends up being Chicago
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,412
- 195,828
Will air during the Finals tonight
- Nov 26, 2007
- 10,123
- 4,223
I see Chicago doing it
Hard for me to see Tomlin and Coughlin allowing their teams to do it
- Jul 7, 2005
- 17,876
- 8,148
I absolutely love it!! Soon and very soon.
Last edited:
- Dec 5, 2008
- 6,463
- 1,844
If they want to get the point across why air a 2 minute long commercial? Most people will change the channel during a commercial that long and they don't even mention the main point of the commercial til the last second. Bad advertising. And they should've included the Braves, Blackhawks, and Indians in this commercial as I'm pretty sure they don't refer to themselves as any of those names either.
elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,412
- 195,828
The actual commercial will run shorter, around 1 minute I read
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
False. The wahoo is alive and well, and isn't going anywhere.
It isn't derogatory to most fans around the Northeast Ohio area anyway. And I remember back in 2003-2004, it was accepted by some Native Americans at the time. There isn't much fight for it to go away.
Last edited:
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
- Jul 27, 2012
- 11,445
- 18,525
It's a whole other topic but that whole calling Washington's football team the diplomats on here is so silly and unnecessariy politically correct to me. There's a name under the NFL logo on their jersey and it doesn't say diplomats. When you look up their team website or look to buy apparel nowhere does it say diplomats.
It is what it is but its silly to me.
It is what it is but its silly to me.
- Dec 5, 2008
- 6,463
- 1,844
what? That's not the point of any of this. The name ******** isn't derogatory towards their fans, it's derogatory to the Native Americans.I still don't see Snyder changing the name until it starts hurting his pockets. And as the 5th most valuable franchise in the world, I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for the name change to come.
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
What I'm saying is the majority of fans love the smiling, happy chief Wahoo logo...there really isn't a fight to get rid of it here.
- Aug 6, 2001
- 12,885
- 2,739
LIke I said:
Paul Lukas @UniWatch
Follow
Indians changing primary logo to the block-C. No change to uniforms, Wahoo still on home cap, sleeves.
11:20 AM - 8 Jan 2014
It isn't going anywhere.
Last edited:
- Feb 17, 2007
- 21,784
- 2,957
Wow, really? Then why all this fuss about the ********?
You can not look at your mascot and tell me that it's acceptable because none of your fan base is offended. That's ridiculous.
- Status
