- Feb 3, 2012
- 1,059
- 1,543
We'll see how he carries the team with those defensive players out early in the season, to me kap is an athlete playing qb Russ is a qb playing qbwilson aint near the talent kap is
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We'll see how he carries the team with those defensive players out early in the season, to me kap is an athlete playing qb Russ is a qb playing qbwilson aint near the talent kap is
Really?If you know the definition there is no explanation required.
I was being facetious.
More often than not his numbers won't wow you, but RW3 has proven himself and seems to have a knack for making timely, game winning plays.
I'm guessing a kap type deal gets his money while helping team retain some of its key role playersI ain't a salary cap expert but they not keeping them all together for years once he gets paid. At the same time I'm not sure what Russell is gonna get offered but if it's top tier money **** will eventually be different.
true.....would be a good look for SeattleI'm guessing a kap type deal gets his money while helping team retain some of its key role playersI ain't a salary cap expert but they not keeping them all together for years once he gets paid. At the same time I'm not sure what Russell is gonna get offered but if it's top tier money **** will eventually be different.
Doesn't count. He only plays one side (as if cover 2 is all they play)...Nevermind that the Seahawks love the talent but care more about the team. What's it matter if you win rings, but can't be indisputably be called the best amongst nobodies?
How so? What have I said that's wrong? You're telling me that Wilson is on the level of Luck? If that's the case your football knowledge is obviously nonexistent. I like Wilson, I've said said that he's good at what he does, but to put him on higher tier isn't fair to every other qb that's up their. Do the Packers win the superbowl without Aaron Rodgers? Saints without Drew Brees? Colts without Peyton? now tell me if the Hawks win without Russell Wilson
Luck should be good. Real good. From what we're told, he'll be the best (one of). Easily better than Russell. He's the Peyton to Russell's Ben, in my opinion...As of today. Now, what would you rather have?
He can cover Boykins all he wants.
He can cover Boykins all he wants.
Nah man Deion was that dude and the rest were going for #2I'd agree with that. I don't think Sherman is a slam dunk as best cb, but when has there been a slam dunk as best cb in the nfl? Deion had competition from Rod Woodson, Darrel Green, and others. I'd love if the Niners had anyone of those top flight CBs.
Rod was a safety I thought and Darrell was an ageless wonder. You had Aeneas Williams too. Young Charles Woodson, Ty Law, Champ, and Ronde were the next group after them.
Lacy did suffer a concussion...
The one thing that 100% of us can agree on. Football is back!
Luck should be good. Real good. From what we're told, he'll be the best (one of). Easily better than Russell. He's the Peyton to Russell's Ben, in my opinion...As of today. Now, what would you rather have?
I'd take both of them over Matthew Stafford.
Deion had competition from Rod Woodson, Darrel Green, and others.
Incorrect. Deion had competition from nobody during his years. The rest of those dudes were just happy they had a chance to met Deion.
Yea you're right, he's not a stat padder.Really?
Because I know the definition and I don't think he's a stat Padder.
They run the ball...
If he was a running back I'd understand. But if they get up, they're not doing 7 step drops.
Rustle Jimmy Wilson for prezident.
You obviously didn't understand the jags comment. If he was on the jags he would be forced to carry his team, something he doesn't currently do. The other top level qbs do that. That's not his fault, but he shouldn't be lauded as one of the best qbs in the game. Why don't we see his flaws? because he is never forced to show them. All he has to do is make good decisions and hand the ball off. Nothing wrong with that, but it doesn't make him a great qb. When did I ever say you compared him to the game's greats? I'm not speaking to you specifically, I'm talking about how Russell WIlson is viewed overall and how can one claim he's a top echelon qb without comparing him to the other great qbs? Look at the original comment before you begin popping off at the mouth.All you've done is make speculative statements with no substance. "Oh what if he played for the Jags he wouldn't be that good." That statement literally says nothing. When have I ever compared Russell to the elites of the league? Please tell me what the flaws are in Russell's game that you see in which you rank him so low. Please just do it. Having an elite defense is not a flaw in his game either, just to get that point out of the way now.
And to answer your stupid question, no we wouldn't have won the Super Bowl without Russell. Maybe the Super Bowl game, but leading up to all of that? Hell no.
I said he shouldn't be lauded as a great qb. Who said I rank him low? I said he's not a great qb. Will he be? Maybe, is he as of today? no. Ben wasn't viewed as a great qb in his younger years, why should Wilson?I don't really think anyone here was hating on him, but it's annoying how he's lauded yet he does practically nothing.