- Dec 29, 2008
- 68,176
- 24,538
Did he just say they need to start McGloin?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Despite a Willis Reed moment (without, you know, the victory) on Monday night against Washington, Cowboys quarterback Tony Romo doesn’t have a green light to play on Sunday against the Cardinals.
And Romo may not get one.
One league source with knowledge of the situation currently believes Romo will miss time with the latest back injury. Dubbed a contusion in a spot different from the site of his late 2013 surgery, Romo nevertheless remains in doubt as the team awaits more information from doctors regarding his condition.
As noted by Clarence Hill of the Fort Worth Star-Telegram, coach Jason Garrett has been all over the place regarding Romo, from saying he anticipates Romo will play to calling that speculation.
The Cowboys will be inclined to keep the Cardinals in the dark for as long as possible regarding whether the 6-1 team will face Romo or Brandon Weeden. Arizona defensive coordinator Todd Bowles will address the impact of that uncertainty on his preparations during Wednesday’s PFT Live.
In all fairness without looking at the stats.
Teddy has played like crap and Bortles just started recently.
How are Carrs stats anyways?
Barron's still better than McLeod and McDonald, as much as he hasn't progressed since Bama like we expected.Marc Barron sucks.
Rams continue to collect blue-chip busts.
Yes, Barron is probably better than the two safeties the Rams have now. He could be an alright SS near the line if he doesn't have to play in coverage.Barron's still better than McLeod and McDonald, as much as he hasn't progressed since Bama like we expected.
Wasn't ignoring your post from weeks ago. I was dead wrong about Tampa having the best starting safety pairing leading into the 2013 season. Barron and Goldson are too similar, and the latter has regressed since coming to the Bucs. His two best years were 2011 and 2012 in San Fran, which is long and far forgotten.
Fisher should play Barron aggressively, attacking near the LOS and secure a solid coverage FS in the Draft or through FA.
Wanted him in Philly for the pick compensation required. He would pair well with Jenkins, who is somewhat of a ball hawk FS and has already paid dividends by creating opportunistic turnovers.Yes, Barron is probably better than the two safeties the Rams have now. He could be an alright SS near the line if he doesn't have to play in coverage.
So is anyone going to admit that Bortles and Bridgewater have ******* sucked?
I'll speak for Teddy, he needs better pass pro and more time to throw the football.So is anyone going to admit that Bortles and Bridgewater have ******* sucked? You guys are talking about Carr and he's the only one that's looked worth a damn at times.
Learning curve is steep at QB. No doubt they are struggling, without any excuses. Trial by fire usually doesn't work in the first season for rookie quarterbacks.yeah just like I thought. Nobody will admit how terrible they've been. Even when they're kept on their feet they've been probably the two worst starting quarterbacks behind Geno/Vick.
Blake Bortles has thrown 12 picks in his first 5 games and 4 of those have been pick 6's. I don't know how that's even possible.
I mean they are rookie QBs.
Dudes expecting instant results
Not everyone is Andrew luck.
Or gets a stacked team like Russy / Kap.
Too quick to judge, bro. 6 games is too small of a sample size, in Bortles' rookie year. If he plays like this next year in J-Ville with no signs of improvement, then circle the "bust" wagons.Bro.
5 games - 12 interceptions and four pick 6's
You don't need a stacked team to not do that. Bortles actually has a bunch of nice young receiving options to throw to so that's not even an excuse.
In all fairness without looking at the stats.
Teddy has played like crap and Bortles just started recently.
How are Carrs stats anyways?
Have to agree that Carr is pretty much the top rookie QB by default right now given the other rookies poor performances and lack of opportunity. His stats are meh but he's also playing on one of the worst teams in the league. He's also managed to give the worst team in the league an opportunity to win games vs New England, San Diego, Arizona, and Cleveland.
I thought a statistical comparison of Andrew Luck's first seven NFL games vs Carr's was worth looking at because honestly in terms of poise, maturity, and readiness as a rookie, that's who he reminds me of.
View media item 1237564
View media item 1237560
Carr's thrown more touchdowns but Luck was able to lead a team that put a few more points on the board and more importantly won games. Luck was also surrounded by far more weapons and talent. Carr's surrounded by an inept OC, the leagues worst run game, and my man James Jones.
Carr's been more accurate, turned the ball over less, and has the higher QBR but he's also benefited from some painfully conservative play calling from the sidelines.
Obviously stats aren't everything, and I'm sure we can count on ST's finest to somehow conclude that I think Carr > Luck followed by rolling smileys, but I did think it was an interesting comparison.
allen robinson, allen hurns, and marqise lee are a bunch of nice, young receiving options? well, at least they're young.
Former Clemson players, Breeland (and Martavis Bryant) making their mark on the league in Week 8.Skins need the same defensive gameplan that they had against the Cowboys, vs. the Vikings this weekend.