- 15,158
- 4,413
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2008
L vs. Light
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Saw The Witch......
LOVED the ending.
movie was never boring TO ME.
this right hereMaaaaan where's my damn hellboy 3 movie
Oh I will never take ur opinion on movies seriouslyDel Toro's got about 37 projects all going at once, so I doubt we'll ever see another Hellboy. Still waiting on him to start At The Mountains of Madness, 10+ years on.
May take the wife to see The Witch this weekend, I'm hearing a lot of good about it. I'm skeptical, though, because the last time a bunch of people recommended a horror movie to me it was It Follows, and I wanted to fist fight every single one of them after it was over.
Just wasn't for me, I guess.Oh I will never take ur opinion on movies seriously
How can u hate on it follows
It was dope
I believe I made the thread for that movie too
HmmmmJust wasn't for me, I guess.Oh I will never take ur opinion on movies seriously
How can u hate on it follows
It was dope
I believe I made the thread for that movie too
Not saying it was a bad movie, despite how I phrased it. It just wasn't the second coming like a lot of people told me it was. The soundtrack was my favorite part, it was pure '80s Carpenter.
I'm hard on horror movies though, it takes a lot for me to praise one at this point. I've been a horror freak going on three decades now so unless something is mind-blowing I will probably be negative on it. It had some damn good imagery and the chase scenes were really well-done, it was just overhyped for me.
Babadook is trashIt was more of a thriller, yeah, but there was some legit creepy **** in it, like the old woman in the school or any of the chase scenes, really. Horror is subjective, though. Like I said I just think it was overhyped to me. Same reason I won't watch Babadook because I'm pretty sure I'll be disappointed in it.
The Conjuring was great. That and Insidious had some of the best creeping scares I've seen in years, they were unsettling as hell. Ghost stories get me quicker than anything else, so that helped. I'm curious about 2 because the Enfield story could be done well, it just really depends on whether they repeat the same beats like they did with Insidious 2 and 3.
The Enfield case was probably a hoax, but that didn't stop the Amityville series. The Warrens are, to put it gently, suspect at the very best when it comes to their cases. They can hire people to write good books, but they were (Ed died a few years back) almost total frauds. Very convincing frauds and great salespeople, but frauds nonetheless.Babadook is trash
Insidious 2 and 3 as well
What's giving me second thoughts about the conjuring 2 is
The enfield story or whatever
Was rumored to just be a hoax
So why make a movie about something that believed to be a hoax
They shoulda did part 2 about the case that had Vera shook up
Remember her husband kept asking her if she was alright
Because of a previous case or something where he was like it took a toll on her
I'm more interested in what they'll say the og team is up to than the movie. Did they retire and go to Florida and stop giving dambs about busting ghosts?
Not bad
Ahh makes more sense now, what their roles will be.It's not a continuation/reboot of the original. This new Ghost Busters is a remake.
It has already been confirmed that Bill Murray and Dan Aykroyd have cameos in the new movie.
"As for the cameo itself, Vulture reports that Murray will not be reprising Dr. Peter Venkman, who the actor portrayed in the first two Ghostbusters installments. Instead, it's rumored that Murray will play the polar opposite of a Ghostbuster in his small role: A debunker of the spiritual world. Original Ghostbuster Dan Aykroyd also filmed a cameo as a conspiracy theory-obsessed taxi driver alongside Kristen Wiig."
http://www.rollingstone.com/movies/news/bill-murray-details-ghostbusters-reboot-cameo-20150901