Man of Steel (Superman Movie Thread) - June 14, 2013 - NEW Trailer pg20

Part 3 dooms day
Imagine those fight scenes :eek
I wouldn't eem be mad if part 2 was lex doing some out of space mission and finding doomsday on an astroid and bringing him to earth and him going all out and supes dying at the end of 2 with him coming back in 3 with Darkside being the mastermind of doomsday really going in earths direction.
Damn I should be a screenwriter
Also any icy remember the Thangarin mention when they was on krypton maybe a Thangarin sighting I. Part 2
 
some villains I'd like to see, but probably won't:

Bizarro

Atomic Skull

Dark Seid (and his crew)

Doomsday
 
Why does everyone thinks this will be a trilogy? :lol

This isn't Snuders baby where money is the primary reason to make the film, not saying that is what Snyder is all about but this film is the starting point for future hero films, not just a sequel to Superman but open it up for other heroes and JLA film(s).

I really doubt Snyder/Goyer with WB has trilogy in mind right now like Nolan did (I think I remember him saying a trilogy was always his intent and that is why no amount of money could make him do another one).

Look at this film as IM1 where it would jump start everything, now it is just up to WB/DC to plan it all out. I want them to follow Marvels route but I think they are too stubborn to do what Marvel did so successfully first.
 
Part 3 will end with superman "dead" after beating doomsday thus the long wait for the reboot that'll come next generation
 
Why does everyone thinks this will be a trilogy? :lol

This isn't Snuders baby where money is the primary reason to make the film, not saying that is what Snyder is all about but this film is the starting point for future hero films, not just a sequel to Superman but open it up for other heroes and JLA film(s).

I really doubt Snyder/Goyer with WB has trilogy in mind right now like Nolan did (I think I remember him saying a trilogy was always his intent and that is why no amount of money could make him do another one).

Look at this film as IM1 where it would jump start everything, now it is just up to WB/DC to plan it all out. I want them to follow Marvels route but I think they are too stubborn to do what Marvel did so successfully first.
Because its 2013. If a movie is good or makes money, it'll have 3 parts.
 
Why does everyone thinks this will be a trilogy? :lol

This isn't Snuders baby where money is the primary reason to make the film, not saying that is what Snyder is all about but this film is the starting point for future hero films, not just a sequel to Superman but open it up for other heroes and JLA film(s).

I really doubt Snyder/Goyer with WB has trilogy in mind right now like Nolan did (I think I remember him saying a trilogy was always his intent and that is why no amount of money could make him do another one).

Look at this film as IM1 where it would jump start everything, now it is just up to WB/DC to plan it all out. I want them to follow Marvels route but I think they are too stubborn to do what Marvel did so successfully first.

Nolan said he never looked at these films as a trilogy and I think that's a bad way to write them anyway. But we cab speculate all we want though :lol

I agree that this is more like IM1 as far as how they want to launch the JLA universe.
 
Why does everyone thinks this will be a trilogy? :lol

This isn't Snuders baby where money is the primary reason to make the film, not saying that is what Snyder is all about but this film is the starting point for future hero films, not just a sequel to Superman but open it up for other heroes and JLA film(s).

I really doubt Snyder/Goyer with WB has trilogy in mind right now like Nolan did (I think I remember him saying a trilogy was always his intent and that is why no amount of money could make him do another one).

Look at this film as IM1 where it would jump start everything, now it is just up to WB/DC to plan it all out. I want them to follow Marvels route but I think they are too stubborn to do what Marvel did so successfully first.
Because its 2013. If a movie is good or makes money, it'll have 3 parts.
And RFX wasn't u the one posting links about Goyer already writing the second one?? V
 
Our grandkids are going to be watching Justice League vs Avengers
 
Why does everyone thinks this will be a trilogy? :lol

This isn't Snuders baby where money is the primary reason to make the film, not saying that is what Snyder is all about but this film is the starting point for future hero films, not just a sequel to Superman but open it up for other heroes and JLA film(s).

I really doubt Snyder/Goyer with WB has trilogy in mind right now like Nolan did (I think I remember him saying a trilogy was always his intent and that is why no amount of money could make him do another one).

Look at this film as IM1 where it would jump start everything, now it is just up to WB/DC to plan it all out. I want them to follow Marvels route but I think they are too stubborn to do what Marvel did so successfully first.
Because its 2013. If a movie is good or makes money, it'll have 3 parts.
And RFX wasn't u the one posting links about Goyer already writing the second one?? V


Someone posted it but all I saw was that WB "fast tracked" it and nothing else. At this point, WB still has JLA penned for a 2015 release and there hasn't been a report which film will be made next. A month or so before MoS came out, there was also report that Snyder will be directing a JLA film for sure if this makes bug bucks so it's all up in the air right now.
 
Because its 2013. If a movie is good or makes money, it'll have 3 parts.

Not really, look at Marvel, they will do as much movies as they can. I guarantee there will be more IM films RDJ or not. It isn't ending as a trilogy.
 
Not really, look at Marvel, they will do as much movies as they can. I guarantee there will be more IM films RDJ or not. It isn't ending as a trilogy.
I should of put "at least" in there. Of course this thing'll get milked. There's a ghost rider 2 damnit..... 2
 
Nolan said he never looked at these films as a trilogy and I think that's a bad way to write them anyway. But we cab speculate all we want though :lol

I agree that this is more like IM1 as far as how they want to launch the JLA universe.

You're right, I think I may have read his quote wrong when he said he planned for TDKR to be the final installment.


I don't think looking at a film as trilogy isn't a bad way to write them, you can plan ahead and plant seeds, exactly what Marvel did but on a much bigger scale. You just need the right people writing/making and planning to make it work perfectly.
 
You're right, I think I may have read his quote wrong when he said he planned for TDKR to be the final installment.


I don't think looking at a film as trilogy isn't a bad way to write them, you can plan ahead and plant seeds, exactly what Marvel did but on a much bigger scale. You just need the right people writing/making and planning to make it work perfectly.
Pretty much. LOTR is a great example of how to make a trilogy from start to finish. The matrix is how not to. IMO of course
 
Is Black Adam a viable villain/anti-hero to go against Superman? Or are they not really known to fight each other?
 
I'm calling it now.

Justice League 3 = Superman vs Evil Superman from another World.
 
Last edited:
The reason ppl think trilogy is because WB is already fast tracking the sequel. Already. I don't know how you don't think a trilogy is coming and if successful they'll just keep making more. No matter the situation surrounding the other JL members and movies.
Faora or however u spell it she was tight in the movie she looked good too i wonder what her vag woulda been like with all that super strength

She'd kill every guy if she was on top :eek.
Like a human praying mantis or black widow spider.......... :evil I'm down
Death by snu snu
 
I feel like they should pace right now and try to set up a worlds finest film first them see if they can make justice league work. I mean the dark knight trilogy is iconic and this new superman is pretty well done. Christian Bale (I don't know how they'll be able to explain Bruce Wayne back as batman but they can do something) and Henry Cavill I think would do well on screen together. Look at this fan made pic. Sorry I'm on my phone

400
 
Just get a new guy to be Bats and director. Nolan completely wasted Bale's talent on the Bat trilogy. I would love a World's Finest film (I prefer it more than a JL movie) but I absolutely wouldn't be able to stand that ridiculous forced deep voice interacting with Superman for 2 hrs.
 
Just get a new guy to be Bats and director. Nolan completely wasted Bale's talent on the Bat trilogy. I would love a World's Finest film (I prefer it more than a JL movie) but I absolutely wouldn't be able to stand that ridiculous forced deep voice interacting with Superman for 2 hrs.

Lol at bales "bat voice".
I don't know if they could replace Bale
right now. People are rooted this current batman trilogy and replacing Bruce Wayne so soon (Gordon-levitt or not) wouldn't feel right.
 
LIke most of y'all, I can't wait to see a JL film on the big screen.

However, I also just can't see how Nolan's version of Batman can share a world with Snyder's Superman/MOS.

Right now, for the two to coexist, Batman has to be rebooted into a more fantastical version of what we've seen in the trilogy. At least, that's how I am imagining it.

Also patiently waiting for a Flash movie...:smokin




...
 
The reason ppl think trilogy is because WB is already fast tracking the sequel. Already. I don't know how you don't think a trilogy is coming and if successful they'll just keep making more. No matter the situation surrounding the other JL members and movies.

Because not everything has to be a trilogy, it could easily expand past that. Trilogy means an end of that arc and a reboot would be looming in afterwards and really, another Superman reboot isn't necessary for the next 30 years. Why are people so obsessed with trilogies? I mean really? Marvel isn't settling for a trilogies, I am not sure why WB/DC would be.

And I honestly do not think a trilogy is coming, I think a sequel or Superman/Batman or a JLA film is/are coming next, my mind doesn't go to 2 more Superman sequels after this.

Again WB fast tracked Goyer to writing but look at the interviews he has been giving after those reports, he is saying this movie can open up to other heroes origin films or even a JLA film. WB always says a bunch of stuff to get the fans hyped but I really do not think they know what their next step is yet.
 
Last edited:
The reason ppl think trilogy is because WB is already fast tracking the sequel. Already. I don't know how you don't think a trilogy is coming and if successful they'll just keep making more. No matter the situation surrounding the other JL members and movies.

Because not everything has to be a trilogy, it could easily expand past that.
It's like you didn't read my post.
Trilogy means an end of that arc and a reboot would be looming in afterwards
No it does not. Trilogy does not mean that AT ALL in movies. Star Wars has two trilogies to it's movie franchise and there was no reboot at all. Same thing with Pirates of the Caribbean. I'm sure if I looked it up I could find more. Trilogy is just an arc of 3 stories in movie format. Doesn't mean a new story can't come along with the same character(s) in place with the established continuity. Makes it easier for another trilogy to come about if the stories are there.
And I honestly do not think a trilogy is coming, I think a sequel or Superman/Batman or a JLA film is/are coming next, my mind doesn't go to 2 more Superman sequels after this.
Well you can think that doesn't mean Goyer, Snyder, and reports from WB haven't indicated otherwise.
Again WB fast tracked Goyer to writing but look at the interviews he has been giving after those reports, he is saying this movie can open up to other heroes origin films or even a JLA film. WB always says a bunch of stuff to get the fans hyped but I really do not think they know what their next step is yet.
I've read the interviews. Just read another two from Goyer and another with Snyder. The Superman franchise opening up possibilities for the JL movie or other movies for other DC characters doesn't mean a trilogy won't happen. Keep in mind this idea that a trilogy means you have to reboot after it is not true at all. Something you kinda just made up. Maybe you're basing it off Spider-Man or past Batman films or the recent one. X-Men had a trilogy they didn't reboot with first class, they simply went back in the timeline and now DoFP is coming which confirms there wasn't a reboot at all.
Just get a new guy to be Bats and director. Nolan completely wasted Bale's talent on the Bat trilogy. I would love a World's Finest film (I prefer it more than a JL movie) but I absolutely wouldn't be able to stand that ridiculous forced deep voice interacting with Superman for 2 hrs.

Lol at bales "bat voice".
I don't know if they could replace Bale
right now. People are rooted this current batman trilogy and replacing Bruce Wayne so soon (Gordon-levitt or not) wouldn't feel right.
Unfortuantely Bale's performance as Batman and Bruce Wayne is forgettable. You put Clint Eastwood on roids and in that bat suit and all he'd have to do is talk with that deep voice and ppl wouldn't know the difference.

I'm more than confident that a good actor allowed to actually act (when there's better writing to portray the character) can easily supplant the current Batman in the most diehard fans' minds. Lets be honest though, it's not even so much that it's Bale that's rooted, it's Nolan's Batman. Once ppl realize and accept that Batman aint coming back they'll ride with another one that's just as good if not better.

All they'd really have to do is write Batman as the world's greatest detective (or at least half way there) as he's known to be and cut out Lucius Fox as being the entire brains of the operation. Add in some human moments with Bruce and boom, better Batman.
 
Last edited:
It won't be a trilogy if there is a JLA or Superman/Batman film in between. IM1 to IM3 is not considered a trilogy simply because IM3 has direct effect from Avengers.

Point is trilogy has to work together and conclude that arc from the first film to the third one w/o any other flm involvements and I do not see them doing that. I read what you wrote but again I do not see them doing a trilogy and then more movies especially if I think they will have other films involving Superman.

And as you said, a trilogy has to be 3 movies to complete that arc, why would they do that if the film is profitable and they can just crank out one after the other? They can just keep going w/o actually thinking of an end to complete an arc. They really should worry about just making one film at a time. And look at the suggestions here? 3rd film having Doomsday and Superman dying. If that doesn't scream reboot afterwards then I do not know what is. Sure Supes comes back to life but I think Supermans death is just the perfect way to end it until a next reboot. But whatever.

I just do not see where the trilogy is coming from, I can see a sequel but if that becomes a huge flop, then a 3rd one isn't coming. Hell MoS could still fail terribly, they made $125mil this weekend but what if it drops to $30mil next week due to MU? What if it makes less than $500mil? I am sure WB could lose faith in the franchise quickly and Nolan is busy with a different movie to try and convince WB with more Goyer scripts. It took 7 years for a new Superman film to come out and it took 3 very successful Nolan Batman films and Nolans convincing WB to have the film made. Biggest selling point of MoS is Nolans involvement.


1st class was meant to be a reboot, it wasn't until they decided to make DoFP that they said it is an alternate timeline. Hell Wolverines Origins is also suppose to be part of this whole XMen world but it really is hard to figure which timeline that belongs to. You can't tell me that once they fit Wolverine in DoFP that they knew it from the get go that it'll intersect with one of these alternate universes. Fox is just trying to fit things together where it could make sense. :lol You cna tell they are just pumping out cash cows w/o much thought to future projects.


At the end of the day, these are all guesses but I honestly just do not see a trilogy coming from this. Come back to me in 6-8 years if I am proven wrong, I'll gladly admit I am wrong but that is not the first thing that comes to mind. I never expected Nolans Batverse to be a trilogy after BB or Tobey SMs.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom