MALAYSIA LOSES CONTACT WITH PLANE CARRYING 239

[jus3]

View media item 876572

 

[bilboshmangins]

thank you!

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

You haven't said anything that I haven't already alluded to, brah.

Also, I like how it's cool for you to tell me that I'm just an observer (which I obviously am) and that what I think doesn't matter. But in the same breath, you can say that being sent a text message about a loved one dying is all good, as if you can't possibly see the problem with that. Take your own advice and put yourself in the shoes of those families, brah.

Carry on. Next time please don't quote me and tell me I said said some **** I didn't say.

ok 

 This crash ain't about you, deal with it 'brah'.

'textbook plane crash' 

 

 

[ayzee]

 
by the time they are individually contacted new will have been leaked to news outlets.

this is an unusual situation and i see no problem with a text, if it wasn't such a public event what you are proposing would have been appropriate.

As the initial means of breaking the news to the families though? No way.

I'm glad they cleared up that SMS wasn't the first method. That would have been horrible.

 

[superblytrife]

 

 

You haven't said anything that I haven't already alluded to, brah.

Also, I like how it's cool for you to tell me that I'm just an observer (which I obviously am) and that what I think doesn't matter. But in the same breath, you can say that being sent a text message about a loved one dying is all good, as if you can't possibly see the problem with that. Take your own advice and put yourself in the shoes of those families, brah.

Carry on. Next time please don't quote me and tell me I said said some **** I didn't say.

ok 

 This crash ain't about you, deal with it 'brah'.

'textbook plane crash' 

 

Yeah, you know those plane crashes where the transponders aren't turned off and the plane isn't presumed to be thousands of miles off course.  Would you like to argue that planes going off the grid, going thousands of miles off course and then crashing are the norm with plane crashes?  This gon' be good.  

Btw, watch the news....a lot of those families are livid.  Why?  Because there is no "proof".  

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 
by the time they are individually contacted new will have been leaked to news outlets.

this is an unusual situation and i see no problem with a text, if it wasn't such a public event what you are proposing would have been appropriate.

As the initial means of breaking the news to the families though? No way.

I'm glad they cleared up that SMS wasn't the first method. That would have been horrible.

for some it was the first method.

I still see no problem with it.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 

 

You haven't said anything that I haven't already alluded to, brah.

Also, I like how it's cool for you to tell me that I'm just an observer (which I obviously am) and that what I think doesn't matter. But in the same breath, you can say that being sent a text message about a loved one dying is all good, as if you can't possibly see the problem with that. Take your own advice and put yourself in the shoes of those families, brah.

Carry on. Next time please don't quote me and tell me I said said some **** I didn't say.

ok 

 This crash ain't about you, deal with it 'brah'.

'textbook plane crash' 

 

Yeah, you know those plane crashes where the transponders aren't turned off and the plane isn't presumed to be thousands of miles off course.  Would you like to argue that planes going off the grid, going thousands of miles off course and then crashing are the norm with plane crashes?  This gon' be good.  

Btw, watch the news....a lot of those families are livid.  Why?  Because there is no "proof".  

So they don't believe that their loved ones are dead?

So I guess you see my point. 

 

[ayzee]

 
for some it was the first method.

I still see no problem with it.

I have a hard time believing that bro. You're sitting at home watching TV, at work in a meeting, or in the car and you receive a text that your family who has been missing is dead. That's ok with you?

To each his own I guess.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 
for some it was the first method.

I still see no problem with it.

I have a hard time believing that bro. You're sitting at home watching TV, at work in a meeting, or in the car and you receive a text that your family who has been missing is dead. That's ok with you?

To each his own I guess.

If my family member was missing in a plane crash that was part of a worldwide media frenzy, and I got a personal text from the organization handling the search, I would have no problem with an authorized message regardless of what format it came in. I would have no problem, just as long as I don't hear it first from some douchebag on CNN.

 

[superblytrife]

 

 

 

 

You haven't said anything that I haven't already alluded to, brah.

Also, I like how it's cool for you to tell me that I'm just an observer (which I obviously am) and that what I think doesn't matter. But in the same breath, you can say that being sent a text message about a loved one dying is all good, as if you can't possibly see the problem with that. Take your own advice and put yourself in the shoes of those families, brah.

Carry on. Next time please don't quote me and tell me I said said some **** I didn't say.

ok 

 This crash ain't about you, deal with it 'brah'.

'textbook plane crash' 

 

Yeah, you know those plane crashes where the transponders aren't turned off and the plane isn't presumed to be thousands of miles off course.  Would you like to argue that planes going off the grid, going thousands of miles off course and then crashing are the norm with plane crashes?  This gon' be good.  

Btw, watch the news....a lot of those families are livid.  Why?  Because there is no "proof".  

So they don't believe that their loved ones are dead?

So I guess you see my point. 

I already acknowledged that some folks probably don't believe their loved ones are dead.  Learn to read thoroughly before responding.  

Answer this:  IF THEY DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEIR FAMILY IS DEAD, HOW DOES THIS CONCLUSION PROVIDE CLOSURE?  

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 

 

 

 

You haven't said anything that I haven't already alluded to, brah.

Also, I like how it's cool for you to tell me that I'm just an observer (which I obviously am) and that what I think doesn't matter. But in the same breath, you can say that being sent a text message about a loved one dying is all good, as if you can't possibly see the problem with that. Take your own advice and put yourself in the shoes of those families, brah.

Carry on. Next time please don't quote me and tell me I said said some **** I didn't say.

ok 

 This crash ain't about you, deal with it 'brah'.

'textbook plane crash' 

 

Yeah, you know those plane crashes where the transponders aren't turned off and the plane isn't presumed to be thousands of miles off course.  Would you like to argue that planes going off the grid, going thousands of miles off course and then crashing are the norm with plane crashes?  This gon' be good.  

Btw, watch the news....a lot of those families are livid.  Why?  Because there is no "proof".  

So they don't believe that their loved ones are dead?

So I guess you see my point. 

I already acknowledged that some folks probably don't believe their loved ones are dead.  Learn to read thoroughly before responding.  

Answer this:  IF THEY DON'T BELIEVE THAT THEIR FAMILY IS DEAD, HOW DOES THIS CONCLUSION PROVIDE CLOSURE?  

i read it thoroughly and it's still some bs. like I SAID, this crash, it ain't about you!

 

[superblytrife]

So are you going to answer the question or nah?  Because you seemed awfully concerned about closure for the families when you initially quoted me.

So again, if they don't believe their loved ones are dead, how does this conclusion provide closure?  

 

[createdestroy]

yall catching feelings in here

 

[bilboshmangins]

 
So are you going to answer the question or nah?  Because you seemed awfully concerned about closure for the families when you initially quoted me.

So again, if they don't believe their loved ones are dead, how does this conclusion provide closure?  

so you're saying that they are still alive?

 

[superblytrife]

 

 
So are you going to answer the question or nah?  Because you seemed awfully concerned about closure for the families when you initially quoted me.

So again, if they don't believe their loved ones are dead, how does this conclusion provide closure?  

so you're saying that they are still alive?

Meh.  Maximum troll level achieved.  

 

[dathbgboy]

With so many unanswered questions, the text message doors now harm than good.

 

[andoneflip]

On cnn flight 370 ended in southern indian ocean all aboard dead

 

[imlive365]

In reality its really ****** up what the Malaysian government just did telling the families this with no proof after making then wait in hotels for 2 weeks with no information.

 

[Naruto]

So they find the plane or naw? Just presumed dead?

 

[imlive365]

So they find the plane or naw? Just presumed dead?

Nope there just assuming there dead so that's what they told there families.

 

[xbiker47]

R.I.P

 

[mean aura]

the plane is somewhere aint no crash b

 

[iamjusayn]

Bruh if they can track. You for saying some crap on twitter. Down to your doorstep. They can find a 200 million dollar air craft.

^ This!

Btw, how long are you guys going to argue back n forth over the same thing? Smh I swear some of yall really live on NT.

Let it go

Oh n I'm not buying that "oh well you know the plane crashed into the ocean and all the passengers died" spiel. Very convenient...

 

[solewoman]

5k for each family member on the plane... Smh that's it?! It's not about the money

 

[picasso swerve]

5k for each family member on the plane... Smh that's it?! It's not about the money

Its not about the money at all. Closure.

But honestly, why is the company even giving compensation? Slap in the face.