MALAYSIA LOSES CONTACT WITH PLANE CARRYING 239

[ballahb]

message that was sent to the families

 

[matters7]

They havnt said they found the plane though so how can they say that. They dont know.

 

[superblytrife]

Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  

I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

 

[matters7]

This ^^

 

[lyonbc1]

The fact that they sent a text message to some of those families is beyond disgraceful :x

 

[yeezusdisciple]

So did they find it?

 

[mrdieselfuel09]

No. They're assuming it's at the Southern Indian Ocean.

What a shame.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 
Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  

I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

So you don't want to provide closure. You prefer to string them along with lame brain theories about alien abductions?

Plane crashed b. 

 

[bilboshmangins]

The fact that they sent a text message to some of those families is beyond disgraceful

why?

 

[dakid23]

I will never fly with this airlines

The way that this whole thing has been handled is ridiculous.

 

[superblytrife]

 

 
Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  

I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

So you don't want to provide closure. You prefer to string them along with lame brain theories about alien abductions?

Plane crashed b. 

What?  Aliens?  Enlighten me on how you deducted that from what I wrote.  

Of course the plan crashed.  Read what I wrote and try again, clown.  

The "why" or "how" part is a valid question though.  We know for a fact that the plane diverted from its intended flight path.  We know for a fact that the transponders were disabled somehow.  Why/how did that happen?  

You really think that the families of those folks didn't already know that plane was in the ocean somewhere?  Of course they did.  They were hanging on for answers on WHY it happened.  They didn't get that and they may not ever get that.  Stating the obvious that it crashed somewhere in the Indian Ocean isn't really closure when there's no answers to why, IMO.  Hopefully those questions will be answered in time.  

 

[ayzee]

 
why?

You really have to ask why?

 

[lyonbc1]

 
why?

You really have to ask why?

right? it's not even right to dump someone over text but they can't have the decency to call every single one of those families and tell them the horrible news? That's like the police or a doctor texting a family that their child was found dead or died from cancer, it's basic human decency. All they've been through and you hit em with an SMS [emoji]128528[/emoji] deep down they probably all knew this was the case but that's a lack of tact on their part

 

[xbiker47]

The fact that they sent a text message to some of those families is beyond disgraceful :x

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 

 
Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  

I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

So you don't want to provide closure. You prefer to string them along with lame brain theories about alien abductions?

Plane crashed b. 

What?  Aliens?  Enlighten me on how you deducted that from what I wrote.  

Of course the plan crashed.  Read what I wrote and try again, clown.  

The "why" or "how" part is a valid question though.  We know for a fact that the plane diverted from its intended flight path.  We know for a fact that the transponders were disabled somehow.  Why/how did that happen?  

You really think that the families of those folks didn't already know that plane was in the ocean somewhere?  Of course they did.  They were hanging on for answers on WHY it happened.  They didn't get that and they may not ever get that.  Stating the obvious that it crashed somewhere in the Indian Ocean isn't really closure when there's no answers to why, IMO.  Hopefully those questions will be answered in time.  

first I say theories, not specificaly to you, but people who are fishing for a conspiracy.

No, actually I don't know what the families of those folks knew or didn't know. I know that they've been told that the plane has been missing...I know that some of them think their loved ones are coming back. 

It's seems that you are more concerned about your questions, than the families questions. I would dare to say that the families first care is about what the status of their family members is. Turning and turning off transponders is only secondary.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 
why?

You really have to ask why?

maybe they signed up for automated alerts on the status of the search. and all news was sent to them via sms?

you guys are always looking for something to be indignant about. 

 

 

[ayzee]

And you believe the breaking development that authorities believe the plane is gone and no one survived should be a part of those automated texts?

An authority about to address the press or something along those lines sounds more appropriate for a mass text.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 
And you believe the breaking development that authorities believe the plane is gone and no one survived should be a part of those automated texts?

An authority about to address the press or something along those lines sounds more appropriate for a mass text.

why not?

I'd rather me receive the news first than the mass public.

 

[hybridsoldier23]

 

 
why?

You really have to ask why?

maybe they signed up for automated alerts on the status of the search. and all news was sent to them via sms?


you guys are always looking for something to be indignant about.   

Declaring a group of people dead should never be done via text message. They should have been individually contacted or this should have been spoken at a press conference. THEN e-mail/text communication should have gone out.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 

 

 
why?

You really have to ask why?

maybe they signed up for automated alerts on the status of the search. and all news was sent to them via sms?


you guys are always looking for something to be indignant about. 

 

Declaring a group of people dead should never be done via text message. They should have been individually contacted or this should have been spoken at a press conference. THEN e-mail/text communication should have gone out.

by the time they are individually contacted new will have been leaked to news outlets.

this is an unusual situation and i see no problem with a text, if it wasn't such a public event what you are proposing would have been appropriate.

 

[00david00]

Gotta agree. Not something you do over a text message imo

 

[superblytrife]

 

 

 
Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  

I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

So you don't want to provide closure. You prefer to string them along with lame brain theories about alien abductions?

Plane crashed b. 

What?  Aliens?  Enlighten me on how you deducted that from what I wrote.  

Of course the plan crashed.  Read what I wrote and try again, clown.  

The "why" or "how" part is a valid question though.  We know for a fact that the plane diverted from its intended flight path.  We know for a fact that the transponders were disabled somehow.  Why/how did that happen?  

You really think that the families of those folks didn't already know that plane was in the ocean somewhere?  Of course they did.  They were hanging on for answers on WHY it happened.  They didn't get that and they may not ever get that.  Stating the obvious that it crashed somewhere in the Indian Ocean isn't really closure when there's no answers to why, IMO.  Hopefully those questions will be answered in time.  

first I say theories, not specificaly to you, but people who are fishing for a conspiracy.

No, actually I don't know what the families of those folks knew or didn't know. I know that they've been told that the plane has been missing...I know that some of them think their loved ones are coming back. 

It's seems that you are more concerned about your questions, than the families questions. I would dare to say that the families first care is about what the status of their family members is. Turning and turning off transponders is only secondary.

So why is it that YOU can be so adamant about the plane crashing, but when I insinuate that the family members probably know deep in their hearts that the plane crashed, I'm wrong? Of course some think they're coming back. But I'd wager that most have been preparing for the worst for awhile now. If you and I can say the plane crashed, so can the family members of the victims. The difference is that they just don't want to believe it, and understandably so.

So logically the next step is finding out WHY their family member died. You're reaching if you're saying that these families are just gonna sit back and say "okay, the plane crashed and they're dead". They'll want answers and they deserve them because this wasn't your textbook plane crash.

 

[bilboshmangins]

 

 

 

 

 
Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  

I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

So you don't want to provide closure. You prefer to string them along with lame brain theories about alien abductions?

Plane crashed b. 

What?  Aliens?  Enlighten me on how you deducted that from what I wrote.  

Of course the plan crashed.  Read what I wrote and try again, clown.  

The "why" or "how" part is a valid question though.  We know for a fact that the plane diverted from its intended flight path.  We know for a fact that the transponders were disabled somehow.  Why/how did that happen?  

You really think that the families of those folks didn't already know that plane was in the ocean somewhere?  Of course they did.  They were hanging on for answers on WHY it happened.  They didn't get that and they may not ever get that.  Stating the obvious that it crashed somewhere in the Indian Ocean isn't really closure when there's no answers to why, IMO.  Hopefully those questions will be answered in time.  

first I say theories, not specificaly to you, but people who are fishing for a conspiracy.

No, actually I don't know what the families of those folks knew or didn't know. I know that they've been told that the plane has been missing...I know that some of them think their loved ones are coming back. 

It's seems that you are more concerned about your questions, than the families questions. I would dare to say that the families first care is about what the status of their family members is. Turning and turning off transponders is only secondary.

So why is it that YOU can be so adamant about the plane crashing, but when I insinuate that the family members probably know deep in their hearts that the plane crashed, I'm wrong? Of course some think they're coming back. But I'd wager that most have been preparing for the worst for awhile now. If you and I can say the plane crashed, so can the family members of the victims. The difference is that they just don't want to believe it, and understandably so.

So logically the next step is finding out WHY their family member died. You're reaching if you're saying that these families are just gonna sit back and say "okay, the plane crashed and they're dead". They'll want answers and they deserve them because this wasn't your textbook plane crash.

you and i can say the plane crashed because we are not personally invested in the situation.

we are simply voyeurs, we don't matter...and the situation really doesn't have matter to us in the grand scheme of things. that's why we can get away with wild speculation and treating the event like a reality show. the crash is not about us, once you logoff you can easily go back to the rest of your life. Those people, the families, are logged on into this event 24/7 its not a simple debate or game for them. That's why its more difficult for them to come to the conclusion that their loved ones are gone.

 

[anomolie]

I feel for those families. I would be doing the same thing demanding answers.

 

[superblytrife]

 

 

 

 

 

Unless they know stuff that they aren't sharing with the public (very possible), I could've stood up there and told the world that the plane is in the Indian Ocean.  Anyone with half a brain could've concluded that given the facts about the flight that we already know.  


I just want to know why.  This seems like a move to save face and provide "closure" for the families since the search has been inconclusive and unproductive so far.

So you don't want to provide closure. You prefer to string them along with lame brain theories about alien abductions?


Plane crashed b. 

What?  Aliens?  Enlighten me on how you deducted that from what I wrote.  


Of course the plan crashed.  Read what I wrote and try again, clown.  


The "why" or "how" part is a valid question though.  We know for a fact that the plane diverted from its intended flight path.  We know for a fact that the transponders were disabled somehow.  Why/how did that happen?  


You really think that the families of those folks didn't already know that plane was in the ocean somewhere?  Of course they did.  They were hanging on for answers on WHY it happened.  They didn't get that and they may not ever get that.  Stating the obvious that it crashed somewhere in the Indian Ocean isn't really closure when there's no answers to why, IMO.  Hopefully those questions will be answered in time.  

first I say theories, not specificaly to you, but people who are fishing for a conspiracy.


No, actually I don't know what the families of those folks knew or didn't know. I know that they've been told that the plane has been missing...I know that some of them think their loved ones are coming back. 


It's seems that you are more concerned about your questions, than the families questions. I would dare to say that the families first care is about what the status of their family members is. Turning and turning off transponders is only secondary.

So why is it that YOU can be so adamant about the plane crashing, but when I insinuate that the family members probably know deep in their hearts that the plane crashed, I'm wrong? Of course some think they're coming back. But I'd wager that most have been preparing for the worst for awhile now. If you and I can say the plane crashed, so can the family members of the victims. The difference is that they just don't want to believe it, and understandably so.


So logically the next step is finding out WHY their family member died. You're reaching if you're saying that these families are just gonna sit back and say "okay, the plane crashed and they're dead". They'll want answers and they deserve them because this wasn't your textbook plane crash.

you and i can say the plane crashed cause we are not personally invested in the situation.

we are simply voyeurs, we don't matter...and the situation really doesn't have matter to us in the grand scheme of things. that's why we can get away with wild speculation and treating the event like a reality show. the crash is not about us, once you logoff you can easily go back o the rest of your life. Those people, the families, are logged on into this event 24/7 its not a simple debate or game for them. That's why its more difficult for them to come to the conclusion that their loved ones are gone.

You haven't said anything that I haven't already alluded to, brah.

Also, I like how it's cool for you to tell me that I'm just an observer (which I obviously am) and that what I think doesn't matter. But in the same breath, you can say that being sent a text message about a loved one dying is all good, as if you can't possibly see the problem with that. Take your own advice and put yourself in the shoes of those families, brah.

Carry on. Next time please don't quote me and tell me I said said some **** I didn't say.