- Oct 24, 2010
- 94,425
- 33,489
someone wake me up when they have any kind of real evidence
MALAYSIA LOSES CONTACT WITH PLANE CARRYING 239
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by jumpman2314,
- Start date
- Apr 27, 2009
- 19,563
- 6,839
- Jan 3, 2004
- 29,014
- 4,130
This is on some all time ridiculous theory that would never actually go unnoticed steez but here's a breakdown anyways...
http://www.snopes.com/politics/conspiracy/malaysiapatent.asp
Claim: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 was made to disappear so one party could gain control of a multiply-owned patent.
FALSE
Example: [Collected via e-mail, March 2014]
This was posted on facebook in a discussion of the missing Malaysia Airlines Flight:
-------------------------------------------------
Here's what you all need to know. Spread this information everywhere:
Four days after the missing flight MH370 a patent is approved by the Patent Office
4 of the 5 Patent holders are Chinese employees of Freescale Semiconductor of Austin TX.
Patent is divided up on 20% increments to 5 holders:
Peidong Wang, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhijun Chen, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Zhihong Cheng, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Li Ying, Suzhou, China, (20%)
Freescale Semiconductor (20%)
If a patent holder dies, then the remaining holders equally share the dividends of the deceased if not disputed in a will.
If 4 of the 5 dies, then the remaining 1 Patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent.
That remaining live Patent holder is Freescale Semiconductor.
Who owns Freescale Semiconductor?
Jacob Rothschild through Blackstone (what an interesting name for a company) who owns Freescale.
Here is your motive for the missing plane. As all 4 Chinese members of the Patent were passengers on the missing plane, and that patent was the breakthrough. We have entered the future proper, and four men was just murdered so that the last, still living member can keep this for himself to either hide or profit from.
Origins: Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 disappeared over the South China Sea on 8 March2014 with 239 persons (227 passengers and 12 crew members) aboard. Several days later, a conspiracy theory was floated on the Internet that four of the passengers on that flight were all co-holders of a recently issued, highly valuable patent and the disappearance of Flight 370 was engineered to eliminate them so that remainingco-holder of the patent could reap all the royalties from it for himself.
The improbabilities of such a theory are numerous. For starters, it's not clear the four men referenced as patent co-holders actually were on Flight 370, as their names (as rendered above) don'tappear on the flight manifest. (It's possible that the seeming absence of some matching names from the manifest could be due to slight differences in the transliterations of those persons' names from Chinese to English, however.)
Moreover, the patent in question is dated 11 March 2014 and involves a "system for optimizing number of dies produced on a wafer." That doesn't sound like a highly valuable, "breakthrough" type of patent that would prompt the murder of four people (much less the death of 235 other innocent parties) in order to gain exclusive control of it. It looks to be a patent for a procedure that moderately improves the efficiency of a particular manufacturing process, not something with a huge market base and a vast potential for profit.
Additionally, the men listed are not actually the patent holders: they're the inventors/applicants, with the patent itself having been assigned to Freescale Semiconductor, Inc., of Austin, Texas. Presumably Freescale Semiconductor is their employer, and it's typical that engineers working in the employ of companies are required by the terms of their employment to assign ownership of their discoveries and inventions to their employers (and thus usually do not receive royalties from any resulting patents).
It's also not a given that if all but one of the co-holders of a patent dies, "then the remaining one patent holder gets 100% of the wealth of the patent" as if a patent were some form of tontine to be awarded to the last man standing. Unless prior arrangements had been made in that regard, the share of the patent held by the deceased may pass to his heirs or estate through the usual inheritance process.
Finally, although the Rothschild name may be a talisman for many conspiracy theorists, it isn't true that Jacob Rothschild "owns" Freescale Semiconductor. Freescale is a public company whose stock is held, in part, by 152 different institutional shareholders. The Blackstone Group, at which Jacob Rothschild serves as a member of the company's International Advisory Board, is one of the largest of those institutional holders (with over 196 million shares), but the Carlyle Group and TPG Group Holdings both own a number of Freescale shares equal to that held by Blackstone.
Last updated: 13 March 2014
Last edited:
- Sep 30, 2013
- 51
- 13
you dont have much control over other cars that can hit you.
and just because you're in "control" doesn't mean you're not going to make a mistake.
almost always a series of things have to happen in order for a plane to crash.
in a car it's just one simple split second mistake that usually humans dont have quick enough reflexes to correct
that sense of "control" is just a false sense of security
the odds between the two are hugely different for a reason...
Last edited:
- Jun 4, 2008
- 12,660
- 5,290
I'm much more interested in all theories revolving this missing plane than I am about this cars vs planes debate.
- Feb 15, 2009
- 9,141
- 1,797
yea i would think that one of those countries would've caught the plane if it entered its airspace, communication or not. and from what i kno so far (
) no country is saying the plane entered its airspace before it disappeared....also with air france, didn't they find wreckage/debris INITIALLY not long after crash but the exact location of the plane wasn't found till a 18 months later?
- May 22, 2009
- 30,710
- 10,482
- Mar 10, 2011
- 8,096
- 3,780
is this true
can't confirm but I also read that he had two houses and his family moved to the other one
- May 28, 2013
- 9,251
- 3,597
vacation home....can't confirm but I also read that he had two houses and his family moved to the other oneis this true
ayzee
Banned
- Sep 22, 2013
- 3,144
- 1,748
What in Christ's name did I just read?
meek meals
Banned
- Jul 18, 2012
- 6,867
- 1,769
that **** gone bruh
For those who think a crashed aircraft "should have been found by now"...
meek meals
Banned
- Jul 18, 2012
- 6,867
- 1,769
username to post correlation
D
Deleted member 37467
Guest
You're gonna be sleeping for a long time, bra.
- Aug 13, 2013
- 7,884
- 2,014
He's not going to wake up ha..
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,180
- 40,100
So that map...it would take 5 hours to get from the point where the plane is to the outer blue edge?
I mean, it takes like 6 hours to get from NY to Cali so...I dont get the radius being that far.
I mean, it takes like 6 hours to get from NY to Cali so...I dont get the radius being that far.
yeezusdisciple
Banned
- Nov 29, 2013
- 5,120
- 1,357
Ny to cali is 3000 miles b
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,180
- 40,100
Which takes around 6 hours...
- May 4, 2013
- 1,353
- 199
My guess is the 2 people that stole the passports hi-jacked the plane (Maybe thats why the altitude went down then up because of a struggle?) and it was landed somewhere with the people on board kept as hostages or something, to where they plan on using the plan as an attack some how.
just a thought
just a thought
superb
Banned
- Jun 2, 2013
- 5,042
- 935
in this day and time 2 people are not hijacking a plane alone.... 2 hijackers vs 249 passenegers...come on
- May 28, 2013
- 9,251
- 3,597
maybe all the passengers are terrorists and figured out a way to all get on the same flight so that they could commanndeer a plane without struggling.
- Jan 26, 2014
- 5,853
- 1,515
what happens if a plane crashes....instant death right?
car crashes are less likely to instantly kill u. plus u have seatbelts, air bags, and the ability to lessen the impact by maneuvering, slamming brakes,etc. it all depends on the speed as well, going 45 miles in a car vs the minimum speed in a plane is a helluva difference
- Jul 18, 2012
- 34,180
- 40,100
Theres statistics for a reason.
You have no control when you're in a plane, at the same time you have no control over other drivers. Plus you drive a lot more so...
Anyways, thats an entirely different topic.
You have no control when you're in a plane, at the same time you have no control over other drivers. Plus you drive a lot more so...
Anyways, thats an entirely different topic.
- Jun 17, 2006
- 44,214
- 2,544
That's what I was thinking.
Bend_The_Knee
formerly gotholesinmysocks
- Apr 11, 2008
- 61,807
- 23,559
It has gone from 14 to 25 countries looking now.
- Dec 22, 2012
- 320
- 196
In each direction b.
