- 13,066
- 7,262
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2007
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Enjoi skateboards did some gloves a couple of season ago too:
Look Again O_o ... Funny/Interesting Pictures...
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by pftjordans,
- Start date
Enjoi skateboards did some gloves a couple of season ago too:
- 13,066
- 7,262
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2007
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Enjoi skateboards did some gloves a couple of season ago too:
- 3,078
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2002
and VeryAnalytical85 is very analytical
- 3,078
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 7, 2002
and VeryAnalytical85 is very analytical
- 440
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
that is beyond disgusting to make gloves out of that
- 440
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
that is beyond disgusting to make gloves out of that
- 8,712
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2006
i thought a "hole" had to be surround on all sides.Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
like an "island" has to be surround on all sides to be considered an island.
- 8,712
- 11
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2006
i thought a "hole" had to be surround on all sides.Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
like an "island" has to be surround on all sides to be considered an island.
- 2,744
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
I think he meant gapOriginally Posted by seniosoul
i thought a "hole" had to be surround on all sides.Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
like an "island" has to be surround on all sides to be considered an island.
- 2,744
- 12
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2009
I think he meant gapOriginally Posted by seniosoul
i thought a "hole" had to be surround on all sides.Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
like an "island" has to be surround on all sides to be considered an island.
- 29,014
- 4,130
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
Yea try not to overthink the "hole"
Point is that space is not filled.
- 29,014
- 4,130
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2004
Yea try not to overthink the "hole"
Point is that space is not filled.
- 3,415
- 63
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
what is wrong with the gloves? i dont get it
- 3,415
- 63
- Joined
- Dec 20, 2008
what is wrong with the gloves? i dont get it
- 440
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
the pink/red fingers represent fingers in a womans vajaj while the brown finger goes in the... other nearby entrance.
- 440
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
the pink/red fingers represent fingers in a womans vajaj while the brown finger goes in the... other nearby entrance.
- 4,617
- 12
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
2 in the pink 1 in the stink...
- 4,617
- 12
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2006
2 in the pink 1 in the stink...
- 10,801
- 3,535
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
My man your avy is 4 megs... You're killin my phone
- 10,801
- 3,535
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
My man your avy is 4 megs... You're killin my phone
- 440
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
Sorry I dont know how to fix that & its a favorite 
- 440
- 10
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2009
Sorry I dont know how to fix that & its a favorite
- 10,215
- 3,310
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
red is 1 whole square bigger than dark green.....so when they switched, the only way to make it similar and miss a space was to move the orange over 2 squares and down 1 square to make up for the 1 it needed to move.....this, creating the 1 whole square that red is bigger than green.
/
- 10,215
- 3,310
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2001
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
red is 1 whole square bigger than dark green.....so when they switched, the only way to make it similar and miss a space was to move the orange over 2 squares and down 1 square to make up for the 1 it needed to move.....this, creating the 1 whole square that red is bigger than green.
/
- 392
- 10
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2008
Damn ya'll never played tetris?
