- Apr 2, 2009
- 6,150
- 508
nevermind, i found it... for anyone interested...
[h1]Mandelbrot set[/h1]
[h1]Mandelbrot set[/h1]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
windycity7 wrote:
ediaz411 wrote:
pftjordans wrote:
more ppl may actually start washing their hands
one drunken night around or in a bar/club & all those will be broken
you walk in and a guy is going full throttle!
windycity7 wrote:
ediaz411 wrote:
pftjordans wrote:
more ppl may actually start washing their hands
one drunken night around or in a bar/club & all those will be broken
you walk in and a guy is going full throttle!
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.
Originally Posted by fraij da 5 11
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by K2theAblaM
Originally Posted by VeryAnalytical85
Originally Posted by RustyShackleford
, two in the pink and one in the...
As for the triangles, the extra square is missing because of the yellow block not having an extra square to fill in the gap made by the green block.That triangle theory is wrong. All the pieces are exactly the same size, just arranged differently.
The extra space is there because the second picture is NOT a triangle, but a 4 sided polygon. The hypotenuse, isn't perfectly straight and the extra space that makes up is lost in that one empty square.
That glove though....
.
I know all the pieces are the same and that they are arranged differently in the second example. But please explain how the hypotenuse isn't "perfectly straight." (unless you're referring to the left angle edges of both the green and red triangles which created the empty spot). My immediate perception was that with the green block it's a 3 and 5 lengths shape. Whereas the orange block is a 2 and 5 length shape. So obviously if you place them side to side, it will combine to make a perfect 2 x 5 rectangle within the triangle. If you arrange any other way (besides the primary example), there will always be a space.
See the intersections of the hypotenuse differ from each other, the top triangles hypotenuse bows slightly in, while the bottoms bows slightly out... Check out the alternate straight lines I drew through it.